Little is known about the impact of engagement in personally meaningful activities for older adults. Thus, this study examines the impact of engagement in one’s favorite activity on cognitive, emotional, functional, and health-related outcomes in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Data were obtained from 1,397 persons living with dementia (PLWD) and 4,719 cognitively healthy persons (CHP) who participated in wave 2 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS). Sociodemographic characteristics were examined by cognitive status. A multivariate analysis of variance indicated that, for PLWD, engagement in favorite activity was associated with greater functional independence and decreased depression. For CHP, engagement in favorite activity was associated with greater functional independence, decreased depression and anxiety, and better performance on memory measures. Findings suggest that engagement in valued activities that are considered personally meaningful may have significant and distinct benefits for persons with and without dementia.
AdamsK. B.LeibbrandtS.MoonH. (2011). A critical review of the literature on social and leisure activity and wellbeing in later life. Aging & Society, 31, 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001091
2.
AdenjiD. O.HongM. (2019). Factors associated with meaningful activities among ethnically diverse older adults. Innovation in Aging, 3(Suppl. 1), S516–S517.
3.
Ashby-MitchellK.BurnsR.ShawJ.AnsteyK. J. (2017). Proportion of dementia in Australia explained by common modifiable risk factors. Alzheimers Research and Therapy, 9(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0238-x
AtchleyR. C. (1999). Continuity and adaptation in aging: Creating positive experiences. Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
AtchleyR. C. (2003). Continuity theory and the evolution of activity in later adulthood. In KellyJ. R. (Ed.), Activity and aging: Staying involved in later life (pp. 5–16). Sage.
7.
BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimizations with compensation. In BaltesP. B.BaltesM. M. (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (p. 1–34). Cambridge University Press.
8.
BartonC.KetelleR.MerrileesJ.MillerB. (2016). Non-pharmacological management of behavioral symptoms in frontotemporal and other dementias. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 16(2), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-015-0618-1
9.
BlesedellC. E.CohnE. S.BoytS. B. A. (2003). Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (10th ed.). Lippincot, Williams and Wilkins.
10.
CantorN.SandersonC. A. (1999). Life task participation and well-being: The importance of taking part in daily life. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 230–243). Sage.
11.
CarlsonM. C.KuoJ. H.ChuangY. F.VarmaV. R.HarrisG.AlbertM. S.EricksonK. I.KramerA. F.ParisiJ. M.XueQ-L.TanE.TannerE. K.GrossA.SeemanT. E.GruenewaldT.McGillS.RebokG. W.FriedL. P. (2015). Impact of the Baltimore experience corps trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11(11), 1340–1348.
12.
Cohen-MansfieldJ.TheinK.Dakheel-AliM.RegierN. G.MarxM. S. (2010). The value of social attributes of stimuli for promoting engagement in persons with dementia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 198(8), 586–592.
13.
EakmanA. M. (2011). Convergent validity of the engagement in meaningful activities survey in a college sample. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100122-02
14.
EakmanA. M.CarlsonM. E.ClarkF. A. (2010a). Factor structure, reliability and convergent validity of the Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey for older adults. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 30, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20090518-01
15.
EakmanA. M.CarlsonM. E.ClarkF. A. (2010b). The meaningful activity participation assessment: A measure of engagement in personally valued activities. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 70(4), 299–317.
16.
EakmanA. M.EklundM. (2012). The relative impact of personality traits, meaningful occupation, and occupational value on meaning in life and life satisfaction. Journal of Occupational Science, 19(2), 165–177.
17.
FriedL. P.CarlsonM. C.FreedmanM.FrickK. D.GlassT. A.HillJ.McGillS.RebokG. W.SeemanT.TielschJ.WasikB. A.ZegerS. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population: Initial evidence on the Experience Corps Model. Journal of Urban Health, 81(1), 64–78.
18.
GalvinJ. E.RoeC. M.PowlishtaK. K.CoatsM. A.MuichS. J.GrantE.MillerJ. P.StorandtM.MorrisJ. C. (2005). The AD8: A brief informant interview to detect dementia. Neurology, 65(4), 559–564.
19.
GitlinL. N.ArthurP.PiersolC.HesselsV.WuS. S.DaiY.MannW. C. (2018). Targeting behavioral symptoms and functional decline in dementia: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(2), 339–345.
20.
GitlinL. N.WinterL.DennisM. P.HodgsonN.HauckW. W. (2010). Targeting and managing behavioral symptoms in individuals with dementia: A randomized trial of a nonpharmacological intervention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58(8), 1465–1474.
21.
HaslamC.CruwysT.MilneM.KanC. H.HaslamS. A. (2015). Group ties protect cognitive health by promoting social identification and social support. Journal of Aging and Health, 28, 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315589578
22.
HasselkusB. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation. Slack.
23.
HookerS. A.MastersK. S.VagniniK. M.RushC. L. (2020). Engaging in personally meaningful activities is associated with meaning salience and psychological well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 821–831.
24.
IkiuguM. N. (2018). Meaningful and psychologically rewarding occupations: Characteristics and implications for occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 35, 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0164212X.2018.1486768
25.
JamesB. D.BoyleP. A.BuchmanA. S.BarnesL. L.BennettD. A. (2011). Life space and risk of Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive decline in older adults. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318211c219
26.
KasperJ. D.FreedmanV. A. (2014). Findings from the 1st round of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS): Introduction to a special issue. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(7), S1-S7.
27.
KasperJ. D.FreedmanV. A.SpillmanB. C. (2013). Classification of persons by dementia status in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS Technical Paper #5). Johns Hopkins University. www.NHATS.org
28.
KatzS.FordA. B.MoskowitzR. W.JacksonB. A.JaffeM. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 914–919.
29.
KlinedinstN. J.ResnickB. (2016). The Volunteering-in-Place (VIP) Program: Providing meaningful volunteer activity to residents in assisted living with mild cognitive impairment. Geriatric Nursing, 37(3), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.02.012
30.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41(11), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
31.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B.MonahanP. O.LöweB. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(5), 317–325.
32.
KuiperJ. S.ZuidersmaM.VoshaarR. C. O.ZuidemaS. U.van den HeuvelE. R.StolkR. P.SmidtN. (2015). Social relationships and risk of dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Research Reviews, 22, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.04.006
33.
LawtonM. P. (2001). The physical environment of the person with Alzheimer’s disease. Aging & Mental Health, 5(Suppl. 1), S56–S64.
34.
LawtonM. P.BrodyE. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179–186.
35.
MeeJ.SumsionT. (2001). Mental health clients confirm the motivating power of occupation. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 121–128.
36.
MenneH. L.JohnsonJ. D.WhitlatchC. J.SchwartzS. M. (2012). Activity preferences of persons with dementia. Activities, Adaptation, & Aging, 36(3), 195–213.
37.
MontaquilaJ.FreedmanV. A.EdwardsB.KasperJ. D. (2012). National Health and Aging Trends Study round 1 sample design and selection (NHATS Technical Paper #1). Johns Hopkins University. www.NHATS.org
38.
MorrisJ. C.HeymanA.MohsR. C.HughesJ. P.van BelleG.FillenbaumG.MellitsE. D.ClarkC. (1989). The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 39(9), 1159–1165.
39.
ParisiJ. M.RobertsL.SzantonS. L.HodgsonN. A.GitlinL. N. (2017). Valued activities among individuals with and without cognitive impairments: Findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study. The Gerontologist, 57(2), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv14
40.
PerssonD.ErlandssonL. K.EklundM.IwarssonS. (2001). Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation—A tentative structure for analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 8, 7–18.
41.
PhinneyA. (2006). Family strategies for supporting involvement in meaningful activity by persons with dementia. Journal of Family Nursing, 12(1), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840705285382
42.
PhinneyA.ChaudhuryH.O’ConnorD. L. (2007). Doing as much as I can do: The meaning of activity for people with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 11(4), 384–393.
43.
PlummerF.ManeaL.TrepelD.McMillanD. (2016). Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: A systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 39, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
44.
RegierN. G.HodgsonN. A.GitlinR. N. (2017). Characteristics of activities for persons with dementia at the mild, moderate and severe stages. The Gerontologist, 57(5), 987–997. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw133
45.
SchretlenD. J.TestaS. M.PearlsonG. D. (2010). Clock-drawing test scoring approach from the Calibrated Neuropsychological Normative System. Psychological Assessment Resources.
46.
SpectorW. D.FleishmanJ. A. (1998). Combining activities of daily living with instrumental activities of daily living to measure functional disability. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(1), S46–S57.
47.
SzantonS. L.WalkerR. K.RobertsL.ThorpeR. J.WolfeJ.AgreeE.RothD. L.GitlinL. N.SeplackiC. (2015). Older adults’ favorite activities are resoundingly active: Findings from the NHATS study. Geriatric Nursing, 36, 131–135.
48.
ThomsonG. (2003). On the meaning of life. Thomson Learning.
49.
TomoriK.NagayamaH.SaitoY.OhnoK.NagataniR.HigashiT. (2015). Examination of a cut-off score to express the meaningful activity of people with dementia using iPad application (ADOC). Disability and Rehabilitation, 10(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.871074
50.
VikströmS.JosephssonS.Stigsdotter-NeelyA.NygårdL. (2008). Engagement in activities: Experiences of persons with dementia and their caregiving spouses. Dementia, 7(2), 251–270.
51.
Wolf-KleinG. P.SilverstoneF. A.LevyA. P.BrodM. S. (1989). Screening for Alzheimer’s disease by clock drawing. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37(8), 730–734.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
