Objectives: This study aimed to reveal the features of older adults’ advance care planning (ACP) discussions by identifying psychosocial factors related to their discussions in Japan, where people value family-centered decision making. Methods: A qualitative study using in-depth interviews was conducted with 39 participants (aged ≥65 years) recruited from the outpatient department of a community hospital in Fukushima, Japan. Data were analyzed using the grounded theory approach. Results: Through experiences of family caregiving, participants became aware of their own feelings about the end of life. Equal relationship with family members was important for lowering the threshold for having discussions. Some participants and their families in the same generation reached agreements on ACP; however, they were willing to yield to children’s decision making despite these discussions. Discussions: These findings provide insights into the psychosocial factors in relation to ACP discussions and support for the role of ACP discussions in the family-centered decision-making culture.
AkabayashiA.SlingsbyB. T. (2003). Biomedical ethics in Japan: The second stage. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 12(3), 261–264.
2.
AsaiM. O.KameokaV. A. (2005). The influence of Sekentei on family caregiving and underutilization of social services among Japanese caregivers. Social Work, 50(2), 111–118.
3.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine, 51(6), 843–857.
4.
BitoS.MatsumuraS.SingerM. K.MeredithL. S.FukuharaS.WengerN. S. (2007). Acculturation and end-of-life decision making: Comparison of Japanese and Japanese-American focus groups. Bioethics, 21(5), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00551.x
5.
BoernerK.CarrD.MoormanS. (2013). Family relationships and advance care planning: Do supportive and critical relations encourage or hinder planning?Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 68(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs161
CarrD. (2012). “I don’t want to die like that . . .”: The impact of significant others’ death quality on advance care planning. Gerontologist, 52(6), 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns051
8.
CarrD.KhodyakovD. (2007). End-of-life health care planning among young-old adults: An assessment of psychosocial influences. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 62(2), S135–S141.
9.
CarrD.MoormanS. M.BoernerK. (2013). End-of-life planning in a family context: Does relationship quality affect whether (and with whom) older adults plan?Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 68(4), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt034
10.
ElwynT. S.FettersM. D.GorenfloW.TsudaT. (1998). Cancer disclosure in Japan: Historical comparisons, current practices. Social Science & Medicine, 46(9), 1151–1163.
11.
FukushimaS. (2011). A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics, 21, 549–571.
12.
HallE. T. (1989). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
13.
HiraiK.MiyashitaM.MoritaT.SanjoM.UchitomiY. (2006). Good death in Japanese cancer care: A qualitative study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 31(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.06.012
14.
KensingerE. A. (2003). Effect of negative emotional content on working memory and long-term memory. Emotion, 3(4), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.378
15.
LambertH. C.McCollM. A.GilbertJ.WongJ.MurrayG.ShorttS. E. (2005). Factors affecting long-term-care residents’ decision-making processes as they formulate advance directives. Gerontologist, 45(5), 626–633.
16.
LebraT. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. University of Hawaii Press.
LongS. O. (2004). Cultural scripts for a good death in Japan and the United States: Similarities and differences. Social Science & Medicine, 58(5), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.037
19.
LubbenJ.BlozikE.GillmannG.IliffeS.von Renteln KruseW.BeckJ. C.StuckA. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513.
20.
MartikainenP.BartleyM.LahelmaE. (2002). Psychosocial determinants of health in social epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(6), 1091–1093. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.6.1091
21.
MatsumuraS.BitoS.LiuH.KahnK.FukuharaS.Kagawa-SingerM.WengerN. (2002). Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: A cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 17(7), 531–539.
22.
McPhersonC. J.WilsonK. G.MurrayM. A. (2007). Feeling like a burden to others: A systematic review focusing on the end of life. Palliative Medicine, 21(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216307076345
MiyashitaJ.YamamotoY.ShimizuS.AokiT.AzumaT.TakadaT.. . . FukuharaS. (2019). Association between social networks and discussions regarding advance care planning among Japanese older adults. PLoS ONE, 14(3), Article e0213894. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213894
25.
MiyataH.ShiraishiH.KaiI. (2006). Survey of the general public’s attitudes toward advance directives in Japan: How to respect patients’ preferences. BMC Medical Ethics, 7, Article11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-7-11
26.
MoritaT.OyamaY.ChengS. Y.SuhS. Y.KohS. J.KimH. S.. . . TsunetoS. (2015). Palliative care physicians’ attitudes toward patient autonomy and a good death in East Asian countries. J Pain Symptom Manage, 50(2), 190–199.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.02.020
27.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
28.
RiegerK. L. (2019). Discriminating among grounded theory approaches. Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), Article e12261. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12261
29.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. SAGE.
30.
SudoreR. L.FriedT. R. (2010). Redefining the “planning” in advance care planning: Preparing for end-of-life decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(4), 256–261. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-153-4-201008170-00008
31.
TeixeiraA. A.HanveyL.TaylerC.BarwichD.BaxterS.HeylandD. K.& Canadian Researchers at End of Life Network. (2015). What do Canadians think of advanced care planning? Findings from an online opinion poll. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 5(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000473
32.
ThurmondV. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258.
33.
ValtortaN. K.KanaanM.GilbodyS.HanrattyB. (2016). Loneliness, social isolation and social relationships: What are we measuring? A novel framework for classifying and comparing tools. BMJ Open, 6(4), Article e010799. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010799
34.
VoltzR.AkabayashiA.ReeseC.OhiG.SassH. M. (1998). End-of-life decisions and advance directives in palliative care: A cross-cultural survey of patients and health-care professionals. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 16(3), 153–162.
35.
YamaguchiS.CohenS. R.UzaM. (2016). Family caregiving in Japan: The influence of cultural constructs in the care of adults with cancer. Journal of Family Nursing, 22(3), 392–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840716655530
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
