Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study aims to identify older people’s home- and community-based care (HCBC) service need patterns and explore the role of living arrangement and filial piety in affecting such patterns. A total of 556 older people were selected in Beijing, China. Latent class analysis and multinomial logistic regression were adopted to identify the service need patterns and the influencing factors. A three-class model of service need patterns was explored (high-needs group, moderate-needs group, and low-needs group). Living arrangement was related to HCBC service need patterns. Compared with the high-needs group, those living with at least two family members were more likely to express low needs or moderate needs. Living arrangement was a moderator for the effect of filial piety on HCBC needs. Greater recognition of the effects of living arrangement and filial piety should enrich the Andersen model and provide a robust stimulus for long-term care policy development and for service delivery and social work.

Keywords

long-term care home- and community-based care service need pattern living arrangement filial piety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersen

R. M.

(1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1-10.

Andersen

R. M.

Newman

J. F.

(2005). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51, 95-124.

Beeber

A. S.

Thorpe

J. M.

Clipp

E. C.

(2008). Community-based service use by elders with dementia and their caregivers: A latent class analysis. Nursing Research, 57, 312-321.

Bradley

E. H.

McGraw

S. A.

Curry

Buckser

King

K. L.

Kasl

S. V.

Andersen

(2002). Expanding the Andersen model: The role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use. Journal of Health Services Research, 37(5), 1221-1242.

Cheung

C. K.

Kwan

A. Y. H.

S. H.

(2006). Impacts of filial piety on preference for kinship versus public care. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 617-634.

China National Bureau of Statistics. (2018). 2018 China population & employment statistics yearbook. Retrieved from http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/navi/HomePage.aspx?id=N2007091124&name=YZGRL&floor=1

Chiu

H. F. K.

Lee

H. C.

Kwong

P. K.

(1994). Reliability and validity of the Cantonese version of mini-mental state examination: A preliminary study. Journal of Hong Kong College of Psychiatry, 4, 25-128.

Chow

(2006). The practice of filial piety and its impact on long-term care policies for elderly people in Asian Chinese communities. Asian Journal of Gerontology & Geriatrics, 1, 31-35.

Chui

(2011). Long-term care policy in Hong Kong: Challenges and future directions. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 30, 119-132.

10.

Dong

(2016). Filial piety among global Chinese adult children: A systematic review. Research & Review: Journal of Social Science, 2, 46-55.

11.

Y. Y.

Guo

Bai

Chui

E. W. T.

(2017). Factors associated with older people’s long-term care needs: A case study adopting the expanded version of the Andersen model in China. BMC Geriatrics, 17, Article 1.

12.

Y. Y.

Chui

E. W. T.

(2020). Development and validation of a Filial Piety Scale for Chinese Elders in contemporary China. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 90(2), 176-200.

13.

Hong

Y. Y.

Chiu

C. Y.

Morris

M. W.

Menon

(2001). Cultural identity and dynamic construction of the self: Collective duties and individual rights in Chinese and American cultures. Social Cognition, 19, 251-268.

14.

Lawton

M. P.

Brody

E. M.

(1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179-186.

15.

Lehning

A. J.

Kim

M. H.

Dunkle

R. E.

(2013). Facilitators of home and community-based service use by urban African American elders. Journal of Aging and Health, 25, 439-458.

16.

Liu

Zeng

L. X.

Wang

(2013). Health-related quality of life and long-term care needs among elderly individuals living alone: A cross-sectional study in rural areas of Shaanxi Province, China. BMC Public Health, 13, 313.

17.

Lou

V. W.

Chui

E. W.

Leung

A. Y.

Tang

K. L.

Chi

Leung Wong

E. K.

Kwan

C. W.

(2011). Factors affecting long-term care use in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 17(3), 8-12.

18.

Mair

C. A.

Quiñones

A. R.

Pasha

M. A.

(2016). Care preferences among middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease in Europe: Individual health care needs and national health care infrastructure. Gerontologist, 56, 687-701.

19.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

20.

Spitze

Ward

(2000). Gender marriage and expectations for personal care. Research on Aging, 22, 451-459.

21.

Suanet

van Groenou

M. B.

van Tilburg

(2012). Informal and formal home-care use among older adults in Europe: Can cross-national differences be explained by societal context and composition? Ageing and Society, 32, 491-515.

22.

Tang

C. S.

A. M. S.

Yeung

Yan

(2009). Attitudes and intention toward old age home placement: A study of young adult, middle-aged, and older Chinese. Ageing International, 34, 237-251.

23.

Tang

(2006). Obligation of filial piety, adult child caregiver burden, received social support and psychological wellbeing of adult child caregivers for frail elderly in Guangzhou, China [thesis]. The University of Hong Kong.

24.

Tetley

(2013). Articulation, service use, managing and coping: Understanding the needs of older people and carers living with dementia. International Practice Development Journal, 3, 1-14.

25.

Traphagan

J. W.

Knight

(2003). Demographic change and the family in Japan’s aging society. Albany: State University of New York Press.

26.

Wang

(2008). Analysis of influencing factors that disabled elders who use home care services and make out different choices in Beijing. Chinese General Practice, 11, 12A.

27.

Wee

S. L.

Sun

Chua

Y. X.

(2014a). Determinants of long-term care needs of community-dwelling older people in Singapore. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 2453-2454.

28.

Wee

S. L.

Liu

Goh

S. N.

Chong

W. F.

Aravindhan

Chan

(2014b). Determinants of use of community-based long-term care services. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 1801-1803.

29.

Yang

(1989). Chinese people’s psychology. Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate Book Company. (In Chinese)

30.

B. Q.

(2013). Study on old people’s willingness to select community care mode: An empirical study in Haidian, Beijing. Journal of Economic Management, 10, 150-153.

31.

Yeatts

D. E.

T. C.

Folts

(1992). Service use among low-income minority elderly: Strategies for overcoming barriers. Journal of the Gerontologist, 32, 24-32.

32.

Zhan

H. J.

(2004). Willingness and expectations: Intergenerational differences in attitudes toward filial responsibility in China. Marriage & Family Review, 36, 175-200.

33.

Zhou

(2008). The tradition of filial piety and seniority rules: The inter-generational relationship in traditional Chinese society. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 5, 77-82. (In Chinese)

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.52 MB

Determinants of Patterns of Need for Home and Community-Based Care Services Among Community-Dwelling Older People in Urban China: The Role of Living Arrangement and Filial Piety

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material