The aim of this study was to investigate the direct and indirect effects of access to employment, volunteer opportunities, and community events on older adults’ perception of age-friendliness and feelings of connectedness. Data were from an age-friendly community survey conducted in a Midwestern city in the United States. We analyzed the responses of 264 older adult residents (50 years and older) using path analysis. Results showed that access to community events, job resources, and connectedness were predictors of older adults’ perceptions of age-friendliness of their community, and that connectedness mediated the relationship between access to community events and perceived age-friendliness. The findings help to refine the concept of an age-friendly community from older adults’ perspectives and emphasize the importance of fostering interactions through community events to enhance older adults’ feelings of connectedness.
AlleyD.LiebigP.PynoosJ.BanerjeeT.ChoiI. H. (2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1-2), 1-18.
3.
AsparouhovT.MuthénB. (2010). Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. Mplus Technical Appendix, 2010, 1-10.
CacioppoJ. T.CacioppoS. (2014). Social relationships and health: The toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(2), 58-72.
6.
ChambréS. M.NettingF. E. (2018). Baby boomers and the long-term transformation of retirement and volunteering: Evidence for a policy paradigm shift. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 37, 1295-1320.
7.
CornwellB.LaumannE. O.SchummL. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185-203.
8.
DentonM.PloegJ.TindaleJ.HutchisonB.BrazilK.Akhtar-DaneshN.. . . BoosL. (2008). Where would you turn for help? Older adults’ awareness of community support services. Canadian Journal on Aging, 27, 359-370.
9.
EmletC. A.MoceriJ. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, Article 173247.
10.
GonzalesE.Morrow-HowellN. (2009). Productive engagement in aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 51-58.
11.
GordonP. A. (2018). Age diversity in the workplace. In de AquinoC. T. E.RobertsonR. W. (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in the global workplace (pp. 31-47). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
Holt-LunstadJ. (2017). The potential public health relevance of social isolation and loneliness: Prevalence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Public Policy & Aging Report, 27, 127-130.
13.
JohnD. H.GunterK. (2016). engAGE in community: Using mixed methods to mobilize older people to elucidate the age-friendly attributes of urban and rural places. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35, 1095-1120.
14.
JohnsonC.ParelM.CobbM.UyD. (2003, October). The strength of the infrastructure of volunteer agencies and its capacity to absorb “Baby Boomer” volunteers. Conference on Baby Boomers and Retirement: Impact on Civic Engagement. Retrieved from http://www.civicengagement.org/agingsociety/links/infrastructure.pdf
15.
KaskieB.ImhofS.CavanaughJ.CulpK. (2008). Civic engagement as a retirement role for aging Americans. The Gerontologist, 48, 368-377.
16.
KimJ. I.KimG. (2014). Factors affecting the survival probability of becoming a centenarian for those aged 70, based on the human mortality database: Income, health expenditure, telephone, and sanitation. BMC Geriatrics, 14, 113-124.
17.
KimJ. I.KimG. (2016). Country-level socioeconomic indicators associated with healthy life expectancy: Income, urbanization, schooling, and internet users: 2000–2012. Social Indicators Research, 129, 391-440.
18.
KimJ. I.KimG. (2017). Socio-ecological perspective of older age life expectancy: Income, gender inequality, and financial crisis in Europe. Globalization and Health, 13, 58-66.
19.
KimJ. I.KimG. (2018). Effects on inequality in life expectancy from a social ecology perspective. BMC Public Health, 18, 243-251.
LevasseurM.DuboisM. F.GénéreuxM.MenecV.RainaP.RoyM.. . . St-PierreC. (2017). Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: A study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians. BMC Public Health, 17, Article 502.
22.
LuiC. W.EveringhamJ. A.WarburtonJ.CuthillM.BartlettH. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28, 116-121.
MenecV. H.MeansR.KeatingN.ParkhurstG.EalesJ. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 479-493.
25.
MenecV. H.NewallN. E.NowickiS. (2016). Assessing communities’ age-friendliness: How congruent are subjective versus objective assessments?Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35, 549-565.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (Version 8). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
30.
NorstrandJ. A.GlicksmanA.LubbenJ.KlebanM. (2012). The role of the social environment on physical and mental health of older adults. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26, 290-307.
31.
NovekS.MenecV. H. (2014). Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendly communities in Canada: A photovoice study. Ageing & Society, 34, 1052-1072.
32.
ParekhR.MalekuA.FidlesN.AdornoG.SchumanD.FelderhoffB. (2018). Pathways to age-friendly communities in diverse urban neighborhoods: Do social capital and social cohesion matter?Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61, 492-512.
33.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
34.
Rémillard-BoilardS.BuffelT.PhillipsonC. (2017). Involving older residents in age-friendly developments: From information to coproduction mechanisms. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31, 146-159.
35.
RichardL.GauvinL.GosselinC.LaforestS. (2008). Staying connected: Neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montreal, Quebec. Health Promotion International, 24, 46-57.
36.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Baco Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
37.
ScharfT.PhillipsonC.KingstonP.SmithA. E. (2001). Social exclusion and older people: Exploring the connections. Education and Ageing, 16, 303-320.
38.
ScharlachA. E. (2009). Creating aging-friendly communities. Generations, 33(2), 5-11.
39.
ScharlachA. E. (2017). Aging in context: Individual and environmental pathways to aging-friendly communities—The 2015 Matthew A. Pollack Award Lecture. The Gerontologist, 57, 606-618.
40.
ScharlachA. E.LehningA. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing & Society, 33, 110-136.
41.
SmithR. J.LehningA. J.DunkleR. E. (2013). Conceptualizing age-friendly community characteristics in a sample of urban elders: An exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56, 90-111.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 209-231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
