We examine Internet use and eHealth literacy among older adults (aged 55+ years) who were patients at clinics serving low-income populations. Participants included 200 minority and White adults who completed interviews based on a technology acceptance conceptual model. A total of 106 participants (53.0%) used the Internet; utilization was associated with personal characteristics (age, ethnicity, education, poverty), computer characteristics (number of e-devices, computer stress), social support (marital status), and health knowledge and attitudes (health literacy, medical decision making, health information sources), but not health status. Of the 106 participants who used the Internet, 52 (49.1%) had high eHealth literacy; eHealth literacy was associated with computer characteristics (number of e-devices, computer stress), and health knowledge and attitudes (medical decision making, health information sources). In multivariate analysis, computer stress maintained a significant inverse association with eHealth literacy. Educational interventions to help older adults successfully use technology and improve eHealth literacy must be identified.
AdamsonI.ShineJ. (2003). Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A bank’s treasury. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15, 441-455. doi:10.1080/095373203000136033
2.
ArcuryT. A.QuandtS. A.SandbergJ. C.MillerD. P.Jr.LatulipeC.LengX.. . . BertoniA. G. (2017). Patient portal utilization among ethnically diverse low income older adults: Observational study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 5(4), e47. doi:10.2196/medinform.8026
3.
BerkowskyR. W.RikardR. V.CottenS. R. (2015). Signing off: Predicting discontinued ICT usage among older adults in assisted and independent living, a survival analysis. In Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Design for everyday life (pp. 389-398). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20913-5_36
4.
BrunerG. C.KumarA. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58, 553-558.
5.
CharlsonM. E.PompeiP.AlesK. L.MacKenzieC. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40, 373-383.
6.
ChauP. Y. (1996). An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers. Information and Management, 30, 269-280.
7.
ChoiN. G.DiNittoD. M. (2013a). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93. doi:10.2196/jmir.2645
8.
ChoiN. G.DiNittoD. M. (2013b). Internet use among older adults: Association with health needs, psychological capital, and social capital. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e97. doi:10.2196/jmir.2333
9.
ChungS. Y.NahmE. S. (2015). Testing reliability and validity of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for older adults recruited online. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 33, 150-156. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000146
10.
CottonS. R. (2017). Examining the roles of technology in aging and quality of life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soci, 72, 823-826. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx109
11.
DarkinsA.RyanP.KobbR.FosterL.EdmonsonE.WakefieldB.LancasterA. E. (2008). Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 14, 1118-1126. doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0021
12.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
13.
DelelloJ. A.McWhorterR. R. (2017). Reducing the digital divide: Connecting older adults to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36, 3-28.
14.
FerrisR.BlaumC.KiwakE.AustinJ.EstersonJ.HarklessG.. . . TinettiM. E. (2018). Perspectives of patients, clinicians, and health system leaders needed to improve health care and outcomes of older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Journal of Aging and Health, February, 30, 778-799. doi:10.1177/0898264317691166
15.
GordonN. P.HornbrookM. C. (2018). Older adults’ readiness to engage with eHealth patient education and self-care resources: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), Article 220. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2986-0
16.
HarrisP. A.TaylorR.ThielkeR.PayneJ.GonzalezN.CondeJ. G. (2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42, 377-381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
17.
Health Outcomes™ Scoring Software [Computer program]. (2011). Version 4.5. Lincoln, RI: Optuminsight Life Sciences.
18.
HongY. A.ChoJ. (2017). Has the digital health divide widened? Trends of health-related internet use among older adults from 2003 to 2011. Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Science & Social Science, 72, 856-863. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw100
KimJ.LeeH. Y.ChristensenM. C.MerighiJ. R. (2016). Technology access and use, and their associations with social engagement among older adults: Do women and men differ?Journal of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Science & Social Science, 72, 836-845. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbw123
21.
LawtonM. P. (1989). Behavior-relevant ecological factors. In SchaieK. W.SchoolerC. (Eds.), Social structure and aging: Psychological processes (pp. 57-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
LevineD. M.LipsitzS. R.LinderJ. A. (2017). Changes in everyday and digital health technology use among seniors in declining health. Journal of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Science & Medical Science, 73, 552-559. doi:10.1093/gerona/glx116
23.
LevyH.JankeA. T.LangaK. M. (2015). Health literacy and the digital divide among older Americans. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30, 284-289. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3069-5
24.
LiddyC.BlazkhoV.MillK. (2014). Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: Systematic review of the qualitative literature. Canadian Family Physician, 60, 1123-1133.
25.
Masterson-CreberR. M.HickleyK. T.MauerM. S. (2016). Gerontechnologies for older patients with heart failure: What is the role of smartphones, tablets, and remote monitoring devices in improving symptom monitoring and self-care management?Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 10(10). doi:10.1007/s12170-016-0511-8
26.
Masterson-CreberR. M.HickleyK. T.MauerM. S.ReadingM.HiraldoG.HickeyK. T.IribarrenS. (2016). Review and analysis of existing mobile phone apps to support heart failure symptom monitoring and self-care management. Using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e74. doi:10.2196/mhealth.5882
27.
Morahan-MartinJ. (2004). How internet users find, evaluate, and use online health information: A cross-cultural review. Journal of CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 497-510.
28.
NguyenA.MosadeghiS.AlmarioC. V. (2017). Persistent digital divide in access to and use of the internet as a resource for health information: Results from a California population-based study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 103, 49-54. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.008
29.
NormanC. D.SkinnerH. A. (2006a). eHEALS: The eHealth Literacy Scale. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(4), e27.
30.
NormanC. D.SkinnerH. A. (2006b). eHealth literacy: Essential skills for consumer health in a networked world. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2), e9.
31.
OrC. K.KarshB. T. (2009). A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of American Informatics Association, 16, 550-560. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2888
32.
PaigeS. R.KriegerJ. L.StellefsonM. L. (2017). The influence of eHealth literacy on perceived trust in online health communication channels and sources. Journal of Health Communication, 22, 3-65. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1250846
RichteringS. S.HyunK.NeubeckL.CooreyG.ChalmersJ.UsherwoodT.. . . RedfernJ. (2017). eHealth literacy: Predictors in a population with moderate-to-high cardiovascular risk. JIMR: Human Factors, 4(1), e4. doi:10.2196/humanfactors.6217
35.
SbaffiL.RowleyJ. (2017). Trust and credibility in web-based health information: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 9(6), e218. doi:10.2196/jmir.7579
36.
ScantleburyA.BoothA.HanleyB. (2017). Experiences, practices and barriers to accessing health information: A qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 103, 103-108.
37.
TennantB.StellefsonM.DoddV.ChaneyB.ChaneyD.PaigeS.AlberJ. (2015). eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(3), e70. doi:10.2196/jmir.3992
VenkateshV.DavisS. S. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sciences, 46, 186-204.
40.
VromanK. G.ArthanatS.LysackC. (2015). “Who over 65 is online?” Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 156-166. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.018
41.
WareJ.KrosinskiM.KellerS. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220-233.
42.
WatkinsI.XieB. (2014). eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(11), e225. doi:10.2196/jmir.3318
43.
WeissB. D.MaysM. Z.MartzW.CastroK. M.PigoneM. P.. . . MockabeeF. A. (2005). Quick assessment of literacy programs in primary care: The Newest Vital Sign. Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 514-522.
44.
YagilD.CohenM.BeerJ. D. (2016). Older adults’ coping with the stress involved in the use of everyday technologies. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35, 131-149. doi:10.1177/0733464813515089
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
