Older adults frequently experience adverse consequences as the result of unmet care needs, including not getting dressed and going without food when hungry. Previous studies have noted that characteristics of the caregiver network may be associated with unmet needs. Using National Health and Aging Trends Study data, I modeled the association between care configurations and unmet needs for men and women. In generalized linear models, formal care was not associated with unmet need among women or men. Compared with recipients of spousal care, men receiving care from one nonspousal caregiver, and men and women receiving care from any other configuration, had higher odds of unmet needs. The level of difficulty with daily tasks was strongly associated with unmet needs. These findings support monitoring older adults not receiving spousal care, increasing access to formal care, and regularly assessing level of difficulty with daily tasks in clinical and research settings.
AdayL. A.AndersenR. (1974). “A framework for the study of access to medical care.” Health Services Research, 9, 208-220.
2.
AllenS. M. (1994). Gender differences in spousal caregiving and unmet need for care. Journal of Gerontology, 49, S187-S195.
3.
AllenS. M.LimaJ. C.GoldscheiderF. K.RoyJ. (2012). Primary caregiver characteristics and transitions in community-based care. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 67, 362-371.
4.
AllenS. M.MorV. (1997). The prevalence and consequences of unmet need: Contrasts between older and younger adults with disability. Medical Care, 35, 1132-1148.
5.
AllenS. M.PietteE. R.MorV. (2014). The adverse consequences of unmet need among older persons living in the community: Dual-eligible versus Medicare-only beneficiaries. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 69(Suppl. 1), S51-S58.
6.
AndersenR. M. (1968). A behavioral model of families’ use of health services (Research Series 25). Chicago, IL: Center for Health Administration Studies, The University of Chicago.
7.
AndersenR. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter?Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 1-10.
8.
AndersenR.NewmanJ. F. (1973). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly Journal, 51, 95-124.
9.
ArbajeA. I.WolffJ. L.YuQ.PoweN. R.AndersonG. F.BoultC. (2008). Postdischarge environmental and socioeconomic factors and the likelihood of early hospital readmission among community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries. The Gerontologist, 48, 495-504.
10.
BakerK. L.RobertsonN. (2008). Coping with caring for someone with dementia: Reviewing the literature about men. Aging & Mental Health, 12, 413-422.
11.
CantorM. H. (1979). Neighbors and friends: An overlooked resource in the informal support system. Research on Aging, 1, 434-463.
12.
CornwellB. (2011). Independence through social networks: Bridging potential among older women and men. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66, 782-794.
13.
DaireA. P.TorresJ.EdwardsN. N. (2009). Family caregivers: Psychosocial impacts and clinical needs. Adultspan Journal, 8(2), 67-81.
14.
DePalmaG.XuH.CovinskyK. E.CraigB. A.StallardE.ThomasJ.SandsL. P. (2013). Hospital readmission among older adults who return home with unmet need for ADL disability. The Gerontologist, 53, 454-461.
15.
DesaiM. M.LentznerH. R.WeeksJ. D. (2001). Unmet need for personal assistance with activities of daily living among older adults. The Gerontologist, 41, 82-88.
16.
FastJ.KeatingN. C.OtfinowskiP.DerksenL. (2004). Characteristics of family/friend care networks of frail seniors. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 23(1), 5-19.
17.
FioriK. L.SmithJ.AntonucciT. C. (2007). Social network types among older adults: A multidimensional approach. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 62, P322-P330.
18.
FreedmanV. A.SpillmanB. C.KasperJ. (2014). Hours of care in Rounds 1 and 2 of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS Technical Paper #7). Baltimore, MD: School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University. Available from www.NHATS.org
19.
GauglerJ. E.KaneR. L.KaneR. A.NewcomerR. (2005). Unmet care needs and key outcomes in dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 2098-2105.
20.
GibsonM. J.HouserA. (2007). Valuing the invaluable: A new look at the economic value of family caregiving. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
21.
HagenS. (2013). Rising demand for long-term services and supports for elderly people. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.
22.
HassZ.DePalmaG.CraigB. A.XuH.SandsL. P. (2015). Unmet need for help with activities of daily living disabilities and emergency department admissions among older Medicare recipients. The Gerontologist, 57(2), 206-210.
23.
KeatingN.DosmanD. (2009). Social capital and the care networks of frail seniors. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 46, 301-318.
24.
KennedyJ. (2001). Unmet and undermet need for activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living assistance among adults with disabilities: Estimates from the 1994 and 1995 disability follow-back surveys. Medical Care, 39, 1305-1312.
25.
LaPlanteM. P.KayeH. S.KangT.HarringtonC. (2004). Unmet need for personal assistance services: Estimating the shortfall in hours of help and adverse consequences. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 59, S98-S108.
26.
LiH.KyrouacG. A.McManusD. Q.CranstonR. E.HughesS. (2012). Unmet home care service needs of rural older adults with Alzheimer’s disease: A perspective of informal caregivers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55, 409-425.
27.
LimaJ. C.AllenS. M. (2001). Targeting risk for unmet need: Not enough help versus no help at all. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 56, S302-S310.
28.
LitwakE. (1985). Helping the elderly: The complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
MillerE. A.AllenS. M.MorV. (2008). Commentary: Navigating the labyrinth of long-term care: Shoring up informal caregiving in a home-and community-based world. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(1), 1-16.
30.
MontaquilaJ.FreedmanV. A.SpillmanB.KasperJ. D. (2012). National Health and Aging Trends Study development of Round 1 survey weights (NHATS Technical Paper #2). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health.
31.
PenrodJ. D.KaneR. L.FinchM. D.KaneR. A. (1998). Effects of post-hospital Medicare home health and informal care on patient functional status. Health Services Research, 33(3, Pt. 1), 513-529.
32.
ReinhardS. C.LevineC.SamisS. (2012). Home alone: Family caregivers providing complex chronic care. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
33.
Rogero-GarcíaJ.Ahmed-MohamedK. (2014). What is the best care for community-dwelling dependent adults?Revista Internacional de Sociología, 72, 403-427.
34.
RosenthalC. J. (1985). Kinkeeping in the familial division of labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 965-974.
35.
SkehanM. E.SpillmanB. C. (2013). STATA programming statements for construction of dementia classification in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (Addendum to NHATS Technical Paper #5). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. Available from www.nhats.org
36.
van HoutvenC. H.NortonE. C. (2008). Informal care and Medicare expenditures: Testing for heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 134-156.
37.
WolffJ. L.KasperJ. D. (2006). Caregivers of frail elders: Updating a national profile. The Gerontologist, 46, 344-356.
