Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite ethical claims that civic societies should foster intergenerational integration, age-segregation is a widespread yet understudied phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to understand the reasons that led community-dwelling older Americans to relocate into senior housing. Qualitative data were collected through participant observation and ethnographic interviews with 47 older adults living alone in San Francisco, California. Half of study participants lived in housing for seniors, the other half in conventional housing. Data were analyzed with standard qualitative methods. Findings illuminate the dynamics that favor age-segregation. Senior housing might be cheaper, safer, and offer more socializing opportunities than conventional housing. Yet, tenants of senior housing may also experience isolation, crime, and distress. Findings suggest that rather than individual preference, cultural, political, and economic factors inform the individual decision to relocate into age-segregated settings. Findings also call for an increased awareness on the ethical implications of societies increasingly segregated by age.

Keywords

ageism ethics housing independence intergenerational relationships relocation and transition sociology of aging urban sociology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelman

(2014). Challenges and opportunities. Bay Times. Retrieved from http://sfbaytimes.com/challenges-and-opportunties/

Beck

(1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity ( Ritter

, Trans.). London, England: SAGE.

Beck

Beck-Gernsheim

(1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Beck

Beck-Gernsheim

(2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London, England: SAGE.

Blocklan

Savage

(2008). Networked urbanism. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Bradley

E. H.

Curry

L. A.

Devers

K. J.

(2007). Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research, 42, 1758-1772.

Briggs

(1986). Learning how to ask. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Buchanan

(1990). Justice as reciprocity versus subject-centered justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19, 227-252.

Buchanan

Brocks

Daniels

Wikler

(2000). From chance to choice: Genetics and the morality of inclusion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Clark

(1971). Patterns of aging among the elderly poor in the inner city. The Gerontologist, 11(1, Pt. II), 58-66.

11.

Corbin

Strauss

(2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

12.

Cowgill

D. O.

(1978). Residential segregation by age in American metropolitan areas. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 446-453.

13.

Creswell

(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

14.

Croucher

(2006). Making the case for retirement villages (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Ed.). York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

15.

Dannefer

(2000). Paradox of opportunity: Education, work, and age integration in the United States and Germany. The Gerontologist, 40, 282-286.

16.

Dupuis-Blanchard

Neufeld

Strang

V. R.

(2009). The significance of social engagement in relocated older adults. Qualitative Health Research, 19, 1186-1195.

17.

Engwicht

(2005). Mental speed bumps: The smarter way to Tame Traffick. Annandale, Australia: Envirobooks.

18.

Erwert

A. M.

(2014, January 30). S.F. rents up more than 3 times higher than national average. Retrieved from http://blog.sfgate.com/ontheblock/2014/01/30/s-f-rents-up-more-than-3-times-higher-than-national-average/#20080101=0&20081103=0&20082105=0

19.

Estes

(1979). The aging enterprise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

20.

Fetterman

(1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

21.

Hagestad

Dannefer

(2001). Concepts and theories of aging: Beyond microfication in social sciences approaches. In Binstock

George

L. K.

(Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 3-21.

22.

Hagestad

G. O.

Uhlenberg

(2005). The social separation of old and young: A root of ageism. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 343-360. doi:10.1111/J.1540-4560.2005.00409.X

23.

Hochschild

A. R.

(1973). The unexpected community: Portrait of an old age subculture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Huang

H. C.

(2012). Factors influencing intention to move into senior housing. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 31, 488-509. doi:10.1177/0733464810392225

25.

Jamieson

Simpson

(2013). Living alone: Globalization, identity, and belonging. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

26.

Kirk

Miller

M. L.

(1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

27.

Klinenberg

(2012). Going solo: The extraordinary rise and surprising appeal of living alone. New York, NY: Penguin Press.

28.

Kuzel

(Eds.). (1992). Standard of trustworthiness for qualitative studies in primary care (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

29.

Lagory

Ward

Juravich

(1980). The age segregation process: Explanation for American-Cities. Urban Affairs Review, 16, 59-80. doi:10.1177/107808748001600104

30.

Laliberte Rudman

(2006). Shaping the active, autonomous and responsible modern retiree: An analysis of discursive technologies and their links with neo-liberal political rationality. Ageing and Society, 26, 181-201.

31.

Lawrence

A. R.

Schigelone

A. R. S.

(2002). Reciprocity beyond dyadic relationships: Aging-related communal coping. Research on Aging, 24, 684-704. doi:10.1177/016402702237187

32.

Lehning

A. J.

Smith

R. J.

Dunkle

R. E.

(2013). Do age-friendly characteristics influence the expectation to age in place? A comparison of low-income and higher-income elders. Journal of Applied Gerontology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0733464813483210

33.

Lennox Kail

Quadagno

Reid Keene

(2008). The political economy perspective on aging. In Bengtson

V. L.

Silverstein

Putney

Gans

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 555-571). New York, NY: Springer.

34.

Luborsky

(1994). Identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In Gubrium

Sankar

(Eds.), Qualitative methods in older age research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

35.

Martinson

Halpern

(2011). Ethical implications of the promotion of elder volunteerism: A critical perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(4), 427-435. doi:10.1016/J.Jaging.2011.04.003

36.

McHugh

K. E.

(2003). Three faces of ageism: Society, image and place. Ageing and Society, 23, 165-185. doi:10.1017/S0144686x02001113

37.

Miles

Huberman

(1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

38.

Phillipson

(2011). Developing age-friendly communities: New approaches to growing old in urban environments. In Settersten

R. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 279-293). New York, NY: Springer.

39.

Portacolone

(2011). The myth of independence for older Americans living alone in the Bay Area of San Francisco: A critical reflection Ageing and Society, 31(5), 803-828.

40.

Portacolone

(2013). The notion of precariousness among older adults living alone in the United States. Journal of Aging Studies, (27), 166-174.

41.

Portacolone

(2014). Older Americans living alone: The influence of resources and intergenerational integration on inequality. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0891241614528709 Retrieved from http://jce.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/04/23/0891241614528709

42.

Riley

M. W.

Riley

J. W.

(2000). Age integration: Conceptual and historical background. The Gerontologist, 40, 266-270.

43.

Rubinstein

(1986). Singular paths: Old men living alone. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

44.

Rubinstein

(1992). Anthropological methods in gerontological research: Entering the realm of meaning. Journal of Aging Studies, 6, 57-66. doi:10.1016/0890-4065(92)90027-4

45.

Rubinstein

Kilbride

Nagy

(1992). Elders living alone: Frailty and the perception of choice. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

46.

Sandelowski

(1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advance in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37.

47.

Shafer

(2000). Housing America’s seniors. Cambridge, MA: Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University.

48.

Silverstein

Giarrusso

(2011). Aging individuals, families, societies: Micro-meso-macro linkages in the life course. In Settersten

R. A.

Angel

(Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging. New York, NY: Springer, 35-50

49.

Skinner

(2012). The interview: An ethnographic approach. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.

50.

Smith

Braunack-Mayer

Wittert

Warin

(2007). “I’ve been independent for so damn long!”: Independence, masculinity and aging in a help seeking context. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 325-335.

51.

Soja

E. W.

(2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

52.

Spradley

J. P.

(1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

53.

Steinmetz

(2014, February). Disrupted: The tech wealth transforming San Francisco has unemployment down, evictions up, and tension flaring. The Times Magazine,, pp. 33-35.

54.

Stoeckel

K. J.

Porell

(2010). Do older adults anticipate relocating? The relationship between housing relocation expectations and falls. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29, 231-250.

55.

Strauss

(1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

56.

Thang

L. L.

(2001). Generations in touch: Linking the old and young in a Tokyo neighborhood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

57.

Uhlenberg

Gierveld

J. D.

(2004). Age-segregation in later life: An examination of personal networks. Ageing and Society, 24, 5-28.

58.

Vanderbeck

R. M.

(2007). Intergenerational geographies: Segregation and re-engagements. Geography Compass, 1, 200-221.

59.

Walker

(2000). Public policy and the construction of old age in Europe. The Gerontologist, 40, 304-308.

60.

Wallace

S. P.

Smith

S. E.

(2009, February). Half a million older Californians living alone unable to make ends meet (Policy Brief [PB2009-4], pp. 1-6). Retrieved from http://healthpolicy.ucla.edu/publications/Documents/PDF/Half%20a%20Million%20Older%20Californians%20Living%20Alone%20Unable%20to%20Make%20Ends%20Meet.pdf

61.

Wildermuth

(2013, December 30). Long-stalled S.F. housing project for LGBT seniors on track. San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Long-stalled-S-F-housing-project-for-LGBT-5102992.php

62.

Winkler

(2013). Research note: Segregated by age: Are we becoming more divided? Population Research Policy Review, 32, 717-727.

63.

World Health Organization. (2007). Global-age friendly cities: A guide. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

“Move or Suffer”

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material