This study explores differences in the out-of-home behavior of community-dwelling older adults with different cognitive impairment. Three levels of complexity of out-of-home behavior were distinguished: (a) mostly automatized walking behavior (low complexity), (b) global out-of-home mobility (medium complexity), and (c) defined units of concrete out-of-home activities, particularly cognitively demanding activities (high complexity). A sample of 257 older adults aged 59 to 91 years (M = 72.9 years, SD = 6.4 years) included 35 persons with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD), 76 persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 146 cognitively healthy persons (CH). Mobility data were gathered by using a GPS tracking device as well as by questionnaire. Predicting cognitive impairment status by out-of-home behavior and a range of confounders by means of multinomial logistic regression revealed that only cognitively demanding activities showed at least a marginally significant difference between MCI and CH and were highly significant between AD and CH.
BaltesP. B.LindenbergerU.StaudingerU. M. (2006). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569-664). New York, NY: John Wiley.
2.
BlackmanT.MitchellL.BurtonE.JenksM.ParsonsM.RamanS.WilliamsK. (2003). The accessibility of public spaces for people with dementia: A new priority for the “open city.” Disability & Society, 18(3), 357-371.
3.
BleA.VolpatoS.ZulianiG.GuralnikJ. M.BandinelliS.LauretaniF.. (2005). Executive function correlates with walking speed in older persons: The InCHIANTI Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(3), 410-415.
4.
BrooksK. R.ScarfoB. (2009). Geographic information systems: Health and aging as a spatial construction. In AbbottP. S.CarmanN.CarmanJ.ScarfoB. (Eds.), Re-creating neighborhoods for successful aging (pp. 33-52). Baltimore, MD: Health Professional Press.
5.
BullingerM.KirchbergerI. (1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand—Handanweisung [SF-36 questionnaire on health—manual]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
6.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
7.
ColomboM.VitaliS.CairatiM.Perelli-CippoR.BessiO.GioiaP.GuaitaA.(2001). Wanderers: features, findings, issues. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 33(Suppl. 1), 99-106.
8.
CroweM.AndelR.WadleyV. G.OkonkwoO. C.SawyerP.AllmanR. M. (2008). Life-space and cognitive decline in a community-based sample of African American and Caucasian older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 63(11), 1241-1245.
9.
DixonR. A.BäckmanL. (Eds.). (1995). Compensating for psychological deficits and declines. London: Routledge.
10.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189-198.
11.
HoltzerR.VergheseJ.XueX.LiptonR. B. (2006). Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: Results from the Einstein aging study. Neuropsychology, 20(2), 215-223.
12.
HorgasA. L.WilmsH.-U.BaltesM. M. (1998). Daily life in very old age: Everyday activities as expression of successful living. The Gerontologist, 38(5), 556-568.
13.
HortJ.LaczóJ.VyhnálekM.BojarM.BurešJ.VlčekK. (2007). Spatial navigation deficit in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(10), 4042-4047. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611314104
14.
HultschD. F.MacDonaldS. W. S.HunterM. A.Levy-BenchetonJ.StraussE.(2000). Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: Comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 14, 588-598.
15.
JamesB. D.BoyleP. A.BuchmanA. S.BarnesL. L.BennettD. A. (2011). Life space and risk of Alzheimer Disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitive decline in old age. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. doi:10.1097/JGP.1090b1013e318211c318219
16.
KleinD. A.SteinbergM.GalikE.SteeleC.SheppardJ.-M.WarrenA.. (1999). Wandering behaviour in community-residing persons with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14(4), 272-279.
17.
KoesterR. J.StooksburyD. E. (1995). Behavioral profile of possible Alzheimer’s disease patients in Virginia search and rescue incidents. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, 6(1), 34-43.
18.
LandauR.WernerS.AuslanderG. K.ShovalN.HeinikJ. (2009). Attitudes of family and professional caregivers towards the use of GPS for tracking patients with dementia: an exploratory study. The British Journal of Social Work, 39, 670-692.
19.
LawtonM. P.NahemowL. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In EisdorferC.LawtonM. P. (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
LevyR. (1994). Aging-associated cognitive decline. Working Party of the International Psychogeriatric Association in collaboration with the World Health Organization. International Psychogeriatrics, 6, 63-68.
21.
LövdénM.GhislettaP.LindenbergerU. (2005). Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. Psychology and Aging, 20, 423-434.
22.
MetzD. H. (2000). Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy, 7(2), 149-152.
23.
MiskellyF. (2005). Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology. Age and Ageing, 34(5), 497-499.
24.
MollenkopfH.HieberA.WahlH.-W. (2011). Continuity and change in older adults’ perceptions of out-of-home mobility over ten years: A qualitative-quantitative approach. Ageing & Society, 31, 782-802.
25.
MollenkopfH.MarcelliniF.RuoppilaI.SzémanZ.TackenM.WahlH. W. (2004). Social and behavioural science perspectives on out-of-home mobility in later life: Findings from the European project MOBILATE. European Journal of Ageing, 1(1), 45-53.
26.
MorrisJ. C.HeymanA.MohsR. C.HughesJ. P. (1989). The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD): I. Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 39(9), 1159-1165.
27.
MurakamiE.WagnerD. P. (1999). Can using global positioning system (GPS) improve trip reporting?Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(2-3), 149-165.
28.
MurataC.KondoT.TamakoshiK.YatsuyaH.ToyoshimaH. (2006). Factors associated with life space among community-living rural elders in Japan. Public Health Nursing, 23(4), 324-331.
29.
OswaldF.WahlH.-W.VossE.SchillingO.FreytagT.AuslanderG. K.. (2010). The use of tracking technologies for the analysis of outdoor mobility in the face of dementia: First steps into a project and some illustrative findings from Germany. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 24, 55-73.
30.
PatlaA.Shumway-CookA. (1999). Dimensions of mobility: Defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 7(1), 7-19.
31.
PetersenR. C.DoodyR.KurzA.MohsR. C.MorrisJ. C.RabinsP. V.. (2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 58(12), 1985-1992.
32.
PetersenR. C.MorrisJ. C. (2003). Clinical features. In PetersenR. C. (Ed.), Mild cognitive impairment: Aging to Alzheimer’s disease (pp. 15-40). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
ProhaskaT. R.EisensteinA. R.SatarianoW. A.HunterR.BaylesC. M.KurtovichE.. (2009). Walking and the preservation of cognitive function in older populations. The Gerontologist, 49(Suppl. 1), 86-93.
34.
ReisbergB.FerrisS. H.de LeonM. J.CrookT. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136-1139.
35.
ReitanR. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271-276.
36.
RothM.HuppertF. A.TymE.MountjoyC. Q. (1998). Camdex-R. The Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly—Revised. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SchaieK.-W.WahlH.-W.MollenkopfH.OswaldF. (Eds.). (2003). Aging independently: Living arrangements and mobility. New York, NY: Springer.
38.
ShovalN.AuslanderG.Cohen-ShalomK.IsaacsonM.LandauR.HeinikJ.(2010). What can we learn about the mobility of the elderly in the GPS era?Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 603-612.
39.
ShovalN.AuslanderG. K.FreytagT.LandauR.OswaldF.SeidlU.. (2008). The use of advanced tracking technologies for the analysis of mobility in Alzheimer’s disease and related cognitive diseases. BMC Geriatrics, 8, 7.
40.
ShovalN.IsaacsonM. (2006). Application of tracking technologies to the study of pedestrian spatial behavior. The Professional Geographer, 58, 172-183.
41.
ShovalN.WahlH.-W.AuslanderG. K.IsaacsonM.OswaldF.EdryT.. (2011). Use of GPS technology for measuring timing and distance of out-of-home mobility of older adults with different levels of cognitive functioning: First findings of the SenTra Project. Ageing & Society, 31, 849-869.
42.
Shumway-CookA.GuralnikJ. M.PhillipsC. L.CoppinA. K.CiolM. A.BandinelliS.. (2007). Age-associated declines in complex walking task performance: The Walking InCHIANTI Toolkit. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(1), 58-65.
43.
SilversteinN. M.FlahertyG.TobinT. S. (2002). Dementia and wandering behavior: Concern for the lost elder. New York, NY: Springer.
44.
SnowdonD. A. (2003). Healthy aging and dementia: Findings from the Nun Study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139, 450-454.
45.
SpreenO.StraussE. (1991). A compendium of neuropsychological tests administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46.
SternY. (2003). The concept of cognitive reserve: A catalyst for research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(5), 589-593.
47.
ThalmannB.MonschA.SchneitterM.BernasconiF.AebiC.Camachova-DavetZ.. (2000). The CERAD neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB)—A minimal data set as a common tool for German-speaking Europe. Neurobiology of Aging, 21(Suppl. 1), 30.
48.
TippettW. J.LeeJ.-H.ZakzanisK. K.BlackS. E.MrazR.GrahamS. J. (2009). Visually navigating a virtual world with real-world impairments: A study of visually and spatially guided performance in individuals with mild cognitive impairments. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(4), 447-454. doi:10.1080/13803390802251360
49.
TopoP. (2009). Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers. A literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28, 5-37.
50.
WahlH.-W.GitlinL. N. (2007). Environmental gerontology. In BirrenJ. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged (2nd ed., pp. 494-501). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
51.
WebberS. C.PorterM. M.MenecV. H. (2010). Mobility in older adults: A comprehensive framework. The Gerontologist, 50(4), 443-450.
52.
WilsonR. S.BennettD. A. (2003). Cognitive activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 87-91.
53.
WinbladB.PalmerK.KivipeltoM.JelicV.FratiglioniL.WahlundL. O.. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment—beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240-246.
