Technology is believed to have a potential for supporting significant others of people with dementia but little is known of their experiences and views of technology. The aim of this study is to explore how significant others relate to technology and to their relatives with dementia as technology users. The focus is on both their own use of technology as significant others and the use of technology by their relatives with dementia. Individual interviews and focus group discussions were undertaken and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. The significant others showed an overall readiness toward using technology in their present roles. Technology use in daily activities was perceived to be an important means to keeping retained abilities exercised but could also be perceived as a possible threat to health if activities were oversimplified. The significant others asked for flexible technology not perceived as stigmatizing, to be integrated into existing habits.
BarbourR. S. (2005). Making sense of focus groups. Medical Education, 39, 742-750.
2.
BharuchaA. J.AnandV.ForlizziJ.DewM. A.ReynoldsC. F.StevensS.WactlarH. (2009). Intelligent assistive technology applications to dementia care: Current capabilities, limitations and future challenges. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(2), 88-104.
3.
BjørnebyS.TopoP.CahillS.BegleyE.JonesK.HagenI.MacijauskieneJ.HolteT. (2004). Ethical considerations in the ENABLE project. Dementia, 3(3), 297-312.
4.
BlacklerA. L. (2008). Intuitive interaction with the complex artefacts: Empirically-based research. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
5.
BodineC.SchererM. (2006). Technology for improving cognitive function. A workshop sponsored by the U.S. Interagency Committee on Disability Research (ICDR): Report from working groups. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 1567-1571.
6.
CahillS.BegleyE.FaulknerJ. P.HagenI. (2007). “It gives me a sense of independence”—Findings from Ireland on the use and usefulness of assistive technology for people with dementia. Technology and Disability, 19, 133-142.
7.
CahillS.MacijauskieneJ.NygårdA. M.FaulknerJ. P.HagenI. (2007). Technology in dementia care. Technology and Disability, 19, 55-60.
8.
CashM. (2003). Assistive technology and people with dementia. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology, 13, 313-319.
9.
Cohen-MansfieldJ.CreedonM. A.MaloneT. B.KirkpatrickM. J.DutraL. A.Perse HermanR. (2005). Electronic memory aids for community-dwelling elderly persons: Attitudes, preferences and potential utilization. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 24(3), 3-20.
10.
CutchinM. P. (2004). Using Deweyan philosophy to rename and reframe adaptation-to-environment. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 303-312.
11.
CutchinM. P. (2007). From society to self (and back) through place: Habit in transactional context. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 27, 50S-59S.
12.
CutchinM. P.AldrichR. M.BaillardA.CoppolaS. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 157-165.
13.
Dahlin IvanoffS. (2002). Focus group discussions as a tool for developing a health education programme for elderly people with visual impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9, 3-9.
14.
Dahlin IvanoffS.HultbergJ. (2006). Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: Basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 13, 125-132.
15.
DemirisG.RantzM. J.AudM. A.MarekD. M.TyrerH. W.SkubicM.HussamA. (2004). Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: A pilot study. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 29(2), 87-94.
16.
FratiglioniL.QiuC. (2009). Prevention of common neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly. Experimental Gerontology, 44, 46-50.
17.
GilliardJ. (2001). Technology in practice: Issues and implications. Journal of Dementia Care, 9(6), 18-19.
18.
GitlinL. N.CheeY. K. (2006). Use of adaptive equipment in caring for persons with dementia at home. Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly, 7(1), 32-40.
19.
GlaserB. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
20.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
21.
HofmeyerA. T.ScottC. M. (2007). Moral geography of focus groups with participants who have preexisting relationships in the workplace. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/6_2/hofmeyer.pdf
22.
HughesJ. C.LouwS. J. (2002). Electronic tagging of people with people with dementia who wander. British Medical Journal, 325, 847-848.
23.
KinneyJ. M.KartC. S.MurdochL. D.ConleyC. J. (2004). Striving to provide safety assistance for families of elders: The SAFE house project. Dementia, 3, 351-370.
24.
KitzingerJ. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 103-121.
Larsson LundM.NygårdL. (2003). Incorporating or resisting assistive devices: Different approaches to achieving a desired occupational self-image. OTJR: Occupation Participation and Health, 23(2), 67-75.
27.
MiskellyF. (2005). Electronic tracking of patients with dementia and wandering using mobile phone technology. Age and Ageing, 34, 497-518.
28.
MorganD. L.KreugerR. A. (1997). Focus group kit (Vols. 1-6). London, UK: SAGE.
NygårdL.StarkhammarS.LiljaM. (2008). The provision of stove timers to individuals with cognitive impairment. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 15, 4-12.
31.
PlastowN. A. (2006). Is Big Brother watching you? Responding to tagging and tracking in dementia care. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 525-527.
32.
RasquinS. M. C.WillemsC.de VliegerS.GeersR. P. J.SoedeM. (2007). The use of technical devices to support outdoor mobility of dementia patients. Technology and Disability, 19, 113-120.
33.
RialleV.OllivetC.GuiguiC.HervéC. (2008). What do family caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients desire in smart home technologies? Contrasted results of a wide survey. Methods of Information in Medicine, 47(1), 63-69.
34.
RobinsonL.HutchingsD.CornerL.FinchT.HughesJ.BrittainK.BondJ. (2007). Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspective in the management of wandering in dementia. Health, Risk & Society, 9, 389-406.
35.
RosenbergL.NygårdL. (in press). Persons with dementia become users of assistive technology: A study of the process. Dementia.
36.
SelwynN. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of alder adults’ use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 369-384.
37.
SpruytteN.Van AudenhoweC.LammertynF. (2001). Predictors of institutionalization of cognitively-impaired elderly cared for by their relatives. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 1119-1128.
38.
SørensenK. H. (2005). Domestication: The enactment of technology. In BerkerT.HartmannM.PunieY.WardK. (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 40-61). London, UK: Open University Press.
39.
TopoP. (2009). Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers. A literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(1), 5-37.
40.
VikK.LiljaM.NygårdL. (2007). The influence of the environment on participation subsequent to rehabilitation as experienced by elderly people in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 86-95.
41.
WangH.-X.KarpA.HerlitzA.CroweM.KåreholtI.WinbladB.FratiglioniL. (2009). Personality and lifestyle in relation to dementia incidence. Neurology, 72, 253-259.
42.
WelshS.HassiotisA.O’MahoneyG.DeahlM. (2003). Big brother is watching you—the ethical implications of electronic surveillance measures in the elderly with dementia and in adults with learning difficulties. Aging and Mental Health, 7, 372-375.
43.
WildeK.BoiseL.LundellJ.FoucekA. (2008). Unobtrusive in-home monitoring of cognitive and physical health: Reactions and perceptions of older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27, 181-200.
44.
WimoA.von StraussE.NordbergG.SassiF.JohanssonL. (2002). Time spent on informal and formal care giving for persons with dementia in Sweden. Health Policy, 61, 255-268.
