Shared site intergenerational programs (SSIP) unite disparate age groups in quasi-kin relationships and meet the care needs of multiple generations of families. SSIPs can effectively support development through intergenerational relationships. However, many programs prove unsustainable. The authors conducted a case study of an established SSIP serving frail older adults and preschool-aged children using surveys and interviews from parents, family caregivers, and older adult clients with dementia. Benefits included appreciation for diversity, formation of close intergenerational relationships, and enhanced client self-esteem. Challenges related to developmental differences and need for greater communication with families. SSIPs can benefit individuals, families, and human services organizations.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Boström, A. (2003). Intergenerational learning in Stockholm County in Sweden: A practical example of elderly men working in compulsory schools as a benefit for children. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships , 1 (4), 7-24.
3.
Bowen, G.L., Martin, J.A., Mancini, J.A., & Nelson, J.P. (2000). Community capacity: Antecedents and consequences . Journal of Community Practice, 8(2), 1-21.
4.
Bredin, K., Kitwood, T., & Wattis, J. (1995). Decline in quality of life for patients with severe dementia following a ward merger. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10, 967-973.
5.
Brooker, D., & Duce, L. (2000). Well-being and activity in dementia: A comparison of group reminiscence therapy, structured goal-directed group activity and unstructured time. Aging &Mental Health, 4, 354-358.
6.
Camp, C.M., Judge, K.S., Bye, C.A., Fox, K.M., Bowden, J., Bell, M., Valencic, K., et al. (1997). An intergenerational program for persons with dementia using Montessori methods. The Gerontologist , 37, 688-692.
7.
Cantor, M. (1983). Strain among caregivers: A study of experience in the United States. The Gerontologist, 23(6), 597-604.
8.
Caspi, A. (1984). Contact hypothesis and inter-age attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 74-80.
9.
Daatland, S.O. (1996). Adapting the Scandinavian model of care for the elderly. In Caring for frail elderly people: Policies in evolution (Social Policy Studies, No. 19). Paris: OECD.
10.
Deutchman, D.E., Bruno, K.A., & Jarrott, S.E. (2003). Young at heart: Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia. Activities Directors' Quarterly for Alzheimer's & Other Dementia Patients, 4(2), 27-35.
11.
Femia, E.E., Zarit, S.H., Blair, C., Jarrott, S.E., & Bruno, K. (2006). Impact of intergenerational programming on child outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-Mental State”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
13.
Gigliotti, C.M., Jarrott, S.E., & Yorgason, J. (2004). Harvesting health: Effects of different horticultural therapy activities for persons with dementia. Dementia, 3, 161-180.
14.
Gigliotti, C.M., Morris, M., Smock, S., Jarrott, S.E., & Graham, B. (2005). Supporting community through an intergenerational summer program involving persons with dementia and pre-school children. Educational Gerontology, 31, 425-441.
15.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Gorelik, Y., Damron-Rodriguez, J., Funderburk, B., & Solomon, D.H. (2000). Undergraduate interest in aging: Is it affected by contact with older adults?Educational Gerontology, 26, 623-638.
17.
Goyer, A. (2001). Intergenerational shared site and shared resource programs: Current models. (Available from Generations United, 122 C Street, NW, Suite 820, Washington, DC 20001-2109)
18.
Goyer, A., & Zuses, R. (1998). Intergenerational Shared Site Project, a study of co-located programs and services for children, youth, and older adults: Final report. Washington, DC: AARP .
19.
Hamilton, G., Brown, S., Alonzo, T., Glover, M., Mersereau, Y., & Wilson, P. (1999). Building community for the long term: An intergenerational commitment. The Gerontologist, 39, 235-238.
20.
Hayden, C.D. (2003). Financial analysis & considerations for replication of the ONEgeneration Intergenerational Daycare Program. Oakland, CA: National Economic Development and Law Center.
21.
Hayes, C. (2003). An observational study in developing an intergenerational shared site program: Challenges and insights. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 1 (1), 113-132.
22.
Jarrott, S.E. (2000, June). Caregiver report. Final report made to the Organization for the Needs of the Elderly, Joining Older and Younger, Van Nuys, CA.
23.
Jarrott, S.E. (2001a, January). Care-recipient report. Final report made to the Organization for the Needs of the Elderly, Joining Older and Younger, Van Nuys, CA.
24.
Jarrott, S.E. (2001b, September). Parent survey report. Final report made to the Organization for the Needs of the Elderly, Joining Older and Younger, Van Nuys, CA.
25.
Jarrott, S.E. (2005). Evaluation. In S. Steinig (Ed.), Under one roof: A guide to starting and strengthening intergenerational shared site programs (pp. 85-97). Washington, DC: Generations United.
26.
Jarrott, S.E., & Bruno, K.A. (2003). Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: An observational assessment. American Journal of Alzheimer's and Related Diseases, 18, 31-38.
27.
Jarrott, S.E., Gigliotti, C.M., & Smock, S.A. (2006). Where do we stand? Testing the foundation of a shared site intergenerational program. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 73-92.
28.
Kaplan, M., Duerr, L., Whitesell, W., Merchant, L., Davis, D., & Larkin, E. (2003). Developing an intergenerational program in your early childhood care and education center (CAT AGRS89 IM6/03nvo4613). State College: Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Science .
29.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first . Philadelphia: Open University Press.
30.
Kuehne, V., & Collins, C. (1997). Observational research in intergenerational programming: Need and opportunity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work , 28, 183-193.
31.
Kuehne, V.S., & Kaplan, M. (2001). Evaluation and research on intergenerational shared site facilities and programs: What we know and what we need to learn. Unpublished manuscript commissioned by Generations United, Washington, DC.
32.
Mancini, J.A., & Marek, L.I. (2004). Sustaining community-based programs for families: Conceptualization and measurement. Family Relations, 33, 339-347.
33.
Meshel, D.S., & McGlynn, R.P. (2004). Intergenerational contact, attitudes, and stereotypes of adolescents and older people. Educational Gerontology, 30, 457-479.
34.
Middlemiss, W., & Meyer, G.J.F. (2003). Introducing an intergenerational, Internet-based tutoring program: Meeting program challenges. Journal of Intergenerational Relations, 1 (4), 7-25.
35.
National Institute on Aging. (2000). 2000 progress report on Alzheimer's disease: Taking the next steps. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
Raynes, N.V., & Rawlings, B. (2004). Recreating social capital: Intergenerational programmes and bridging networks: An English model-Phase 1. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 2(1), 7-28.
40.
Salari, S. (2002). Intergenerational partnerships in adult day centers: Importance of age-appropriate environments and behaviors. The Gerontologist, 42, 321-333.
41.
Seefeldt, C. (1987). The effects of preschoolers' visits to a nursing home. The Gerontologist, 27, 228-232.
42.
Silverstein, M., & Parrott, T.M. (1997). Attitudes toward public support of the elderly . Research on Aging, 19, 108-132.
43.
Smith, C.B. (1994). Back and to the future: The intergroup contact hypothesis revisited. Sociological Inquiry, 64, 438-455.
44.
Smith, K. (1997). Who's minding the kids? Child care arrangements: Spring, 1997 (Current Population Reports PS70-86). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
45.
Stanton, G., & Tench, P. (2003). Intergenerational storyline bringing the generations together in North Tyneside. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships , 1(1), 71-80.
46.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Strom, R., & Strom, S. (1999). Establishing school volunteer programs. Child & Youth Services, 20(1/2), 175-188.
48.
Taylor, A.S., LoSciuto, L., Fox, M., Hilbert, S.M., & Sonkowsky, M. (1999). The mentoring factor: Evaluation of the across ages' intergenerational approach to drug prevention. Child and Youth Services, 20, 77-99.
49.
Zarit, S.H., Stephens, M.A.P., Townsend, A., & Greene, R. (1998). Stress reduction for family caregivers: Effects of adult day care use. Journal of Gerontology: Social Science , 53B(5), 267-277.
