An intergenerational intervention strategy called Generation Station was established and field tested at a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) in central Pennsylvania over a 13-month period beginning in 2001. With the goal of exposing residents to a broad range of possibilities for intergenerational contact, the emphasis of this intervention was on building the institution’s capacity to conduct intergenerational programs rather than on creating a finite, activity-specific program. The process involved identifying local children and youth programs, engaging administrators in interagency dialogue, and formulating intergenerational program-matic links based on complementary objectives and curricula of local organizations. Results were drawn from interviews conducted with CCRC residents and staff and from observations of intergenerational activities. CCRC residents and staff deemed multiple activities with multiple organizational partners as a convenient way to establish a flexible program and address the diverse interests, abilities, and preferences of retirement community residents and local youth.
American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging. (2002). Selecting a continuing care retirement community. Retrieved October 31, 2002, from http://www.aahsa.org/public/ccrc.htm
2.
AARP. (1998). Intergenerational shared site project. Final report. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Aday, R. H., Sims, C. R., McDuffie, W., & Evan, E. (1996). Changing children’s attitudes toward the elderly: The longitudinal effects of an intergenerational program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10(2), 143-151.
4.
Barista, D. (2001). Designing for the big boom. Building Design & Construction, 42(11), 40-42.
5.
Brabazon, K. (1999). Student improvement in the intergeerational work/study program. In V. S. Kuehne (Ed.), Intergenerational programs: Understanding what we have created (pp. 51-61). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
6.
Corbin, D. E., Kagan, D. M., & Metal-Corbin, J. (1987). Content analysis of an intergenerational unit on aging in a sixth-grade classroom. Educational Gerontology, 13(5), 403-410.
7.
Davis, R. H., & Westbrook, G. J. (1981). Intergenerational dialogues: A tested educational program for children. Educational Gerontology, 7, 383-396.
8.
Eheart, B. K., Hopping, D., Power, M. B., & Racine, D. (2005, April). Intergenerational community as intervention (White paper). Rantoul, IL: Generations of Hope.
9.
Freedman, M. (1999). PrimeTime: How baby boomers will revolutionize retirement and transform America. New York: Public Affairs.
10.
Fried, L. P., Freedman, M., Endres, T., Rebok, G. W., Carlson, M. C., Seeman, T. E., et al. (2000, November). The Experience Corps: A social model for health promotion, generativity, and decreasing structural lag for older adults. Symposium presented at the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, DC.
11.
Friedman, B. M. (1999). Connecting generations: Integrating aging education and intergenerational programs with elementary and middle grades curricula. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Generations United. (2002). Young and old serving together: Meeting community needs through intergenerational partnerships. Washington, DC: Author.
13.
Henkin, N. (2004, June). Beyond programs: Moving toward age-integrated communities. Presentation at the Second Biennial Conference of the International Consortium for Intergenerational Programmes, Victoria, Canada.
14.
Henkin, N., & Kingson, E. (Eds.) (1998/1999). Keeping the promise: Intergenerational strategies for strengthening the social compact [Special issue]. Generations, 22(4).
15.
Horwitz, B. (2001). Savvy senior housing. Building Design and Construction, 42(12), 26-29.
16.
Jenkins, K. R., Pienta, A. M., & Horgas, A. L. (2002). Activity and health-related quality of life in continuing care retirement communities. Research on Aging, 24(1), 124-149.
17.
Kaplan, M. (1997). The benefits of intergenerational community service projects: Implications for promoting intergenerational unity, community activism, and cultural continuity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28(1/2), 211-228.
18.
Kaplan, M. (2002). Intergenerational programs in schools: Considerations of form and function. International Review of Education, 48(4), 305-334.
19.
Kaplan, M. (2004). Intergenerational engagement: Programs, practices, and priorities. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 96(2), 5-9.
20.
Kaplan, M., Henkin, N., & Kusano, A. (Eds.). (2002). Linking lifetimes: A global view of inter-generational exchange. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
21.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567-606). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Kirschenbaum, J., & Russ, L. (2002). Community mapping: Using geographic data for neighborhood revitalization. Oakland, CA: Policy Link.
23.
Krout, J. A., Oggins, J., & Holmes, H. H. (2000). Patterns of service use in a continuing care retirement community. The Gerontologist, 40(6), 698-705.
24.
Luken, P. C., & Vaughan, S. (2003). “Active living”: Transforming the organization of retirement and housing in the U.S. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 30(1), 145-169.
25.
Netting, F. E., & Unks, R. P. (1984). Life care: An emerging industry in need of professional scrutiny. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 3(1), 20-33.
26.
Newman, S., Karip, E., & Faux, R. B. (1995). Everyday memory function of older adults: The impact of intergenerational school volunteer programs. Educational Gerontology, 21, 569-580.
27.
Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Services. (1992). Housing as we grow older. Ithaca, NY: Author.
28.
Rossberg-Gempton, I. E., von Dickinson, J., & Poole, G. (1999). Creative dance: Potentiality for enhancing social functioning in frail seniors and young children. Arts in Psychotherapy, 26(5), 313-327.
29.
Short-DeGraff, M. A., & Diamond, K. (1996). Intergenerational program effects on social responses of elderly adult day care members. Educational Gerontology, 22, 467-482.
30.
Somers, A. R. (1993). “Lifecare”: A viable option for long-term care for the elderly. Journal of American Geriatric Society, 41, 188-191.
31.
Thorp, K. (Ed.). (1985). Intergenerational programs: A resource for community renewal. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Positive Youth Development Initiative.
