In this article, the authors take a systematic look at transaction costs and barriers to a university-community partnership during the design and implementation of a Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Training Certificate. The development of the authors’ university-community partnership was fueled by a funding source that enabled the Virginia Geriatric Education Center to work with three large health care systems. The purpose of the grant was to develop a geriatric interdisciplinary team curriculum for community-based health care professionals. The interdisciplinary planning committee, consisting of both university-based educators and community-based practitioners, designed a 50-hour curriculum that covered diverse clinical topics with an interactive format. In the process, the authors identified within-site, across-site, and between-partner barriers that need to be addressed for successful implementation.
Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and business. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69-97.
2.
Austin, M. J., Martin, M., Carnochan, S., Goldberg, S., Berrick, J. D., Weiss, B., et al. (1999). Building a comprehensive agency-university partnership: A case study of the bay area social services consortium. Journal of Community Practice, 6(3), 89-106.
3.
Drinka, T. J. K., & Clark, P. G. (2000). Health care teamwork: Interdisciplinary practice and teaching. Westport, CT: Alburn House.
4.
Drinka, T. J. K., & Streim, J. E. (1994). Case studies from purgatory: Maladaptive behavior within geriatrics health care teams. The Gerontologist, 34(4), 541-547.
5.
Ferrell, M. P., Heinemann, G. D., & Schmitt, M. H. (1986). Informal roles, rituals and styles of humor in interdisciplinary health care team: Their relationship to stages of group development. International Journal of Small Group Research, 2, 143-162.
6.
Foster, M. K., & Meinhard, A. G. (2002). A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 549-564.
7.
Garner, H. G., & Orelove, F. P. (1994). Teamwork in human services. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
8.
Gleich, C. S. (1988). Innovations in geriatric drug training: The experience in the geriatric education centers. Journal of Geriatric Drug Therapy, 2(2/3), 69-81.
9.
Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
10.
Howe, J. L., Mellor, M. J., & Cassel, C. K. (1999). Cross-disciplinary approaches to teaching interdisciplinary team work and geriatrics. Gerontology& Geriatrics Education, 19(4), 3-17.
11.
Jablonski, R., Cifu, D. X., Boling, P. A., Slattum, P. W., Peyton, A. L., Netting, F. E., et al. (1999). Case study: Geriatric interdisciplinary team training. Age in Action, 14(1), 1-6.
12.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
13.
O’Neil, E. H. (1993). Health professions education for the future: Schools in service to the nation. San Francisco: Pew Health Professions Commission.
14.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Phillips, S. D., & Graham, K. A. (2000). Hand-in-hand: When accountability meets collaboration in the voluntary sector. In K. Banting (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in Canada: Roles and relationships (pp. 149-191). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
16.
Powell, J., Dosser, D., Handron, D., McCammon, S., Temkin, M. E., & Kaufman, M. (1999). Challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration: A faculty consortium’s initial attempts to model collaborative practice. Journal of Community Practice, 6(2), 27-48.
17.
Rapp, C. A., & Whitfield, C. M. (1999). Neighborhood-based services: Organizational change and integration prospects. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(3), 261-276.
18.
Rice, A. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary collaboration in health care: Education, practice, and research. National Academies of Practice Forum, 2(1), 59-73.
19.
Robinson, K., & Walsh, R. O. (1999). Blunders of interdisciplinary education: Our first experience. National Academies of Practice Forum, 1(1), 7-11.
20.
Runge, A., Castle, B., Rush, T. L., Rowe, M., & Ostwald, S. K. (2001). A beneficial blend. Balance, 5(4), 17, 20-22.
21.
Siegler, E. L., Hyer, K., Fulmer, T., & Mezey, M. (Eds.). (1998). Geriatric interdisciplinary team training. New York: Springer.
22.
Welleford, E. A., Parham, I. A., Netting, F. E., Coogle, C. L., Burke, L. P., & Garner, H. (2001). Geriatric interdisciplinary teams: A long-distance learning course. National Academies of Practice Forum, 3(4), 249-255.
23.
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-296.
