In this article, the authors report data from four states that have computerized their long-term care ombudsman databases and are using the same software. The authors explore the apparent differences among these four states to encourage critical thinking in interpreting the meaning of these data. Just as a national ombudsman database draws closer, so does the need for practitioners, researchers, educators, and policy makers to be vigilant in understanding that data must be contextualized. Otherwise, premature and inaccurate conclusions may be drawn. Critically important is the link between those persons who analyze and interpret and the ombudsman practitioners who collect and report these data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Administration on Aging
. (1995). Long term care ombudsman annual report: Fiscal year 1995. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.
2.
Allen-Meares, P.
,& Lane, B. A. (1990). Socialwork practice: Integrating qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques. Social Work, 35(5), 452-458.
3.
Auslander, G. K.
, & Cohen, M. E. (1992). Issues in the development of social work information systems: The case of hospital social work departments. Administration in Social Work, 16(2), 73-88.
4.
Caputo, R. K.
(1986). The role of information systems in evaluation research. Administration in Social Work, 10(1), 67-77.
5.
Chelimsky, E.
(1991, June 13). Access to and utilization of the ombudsman program under the Older Americans Act. U.S. General Accounting Office Testimony before the Subcommittee on Aging, Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources.
6.
Cherry, R. L.
(1991). Agents of nursing home quality of care: Ombudsmen and staff ratios revisited. The Gerontologist, 31(3), 302-308.
7.
Cherry, R. L.
(1993). Community presence and nursing home quality of care: The ombudsman as a complementary role. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 336-345.
8.
Connor, K. A.
, & Winkelpleck, J. (1990). Volunteer advocates: Differing role expectations of long-term care facility administrators and volunteers. Journal of Long-Term Care Administration, 18(2), 12-15.
9.
Edwards, R. L.
,& Reid, W. J. (1989). Structured case recording in child welfare: An assessment of social workers' reactions. Social Work, 34(1), 49-52.
10.
Harris-Wehling, J.
, Feasley, J. C., & Estes, C. L. (1995). Real people real problems: An evaluation of the long term care ombudsman programs of the Older Americans Act. Washington, DC: Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine.
11.
Hoefer, R.
, Hoefer, R. A., & Tobias, R. A. (1994). Geographic information systems and human services. Journal of Community Practice, 1(3), 113-127.
12.
Huber, R.
, Borders, K., Netting, F. E., & Kautz, J. R. (1997). To empower ombudsman with meaningful data: Lessons learned in building an alliance between researchers and long term care ombudsmen. Journal of Community Practice, 4(4), 81-101.
13.
Huber, R.
, Netting, F. E.,& Kautz, J. R. (1996). Differences in types of complaints and howthey were resolved by local long-term care ombudsmen operating in/not in area agencies on aging. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 15(1), 87-101.
14.
Huber, R.
, Netting, F. E.,& Paton, R. N. (1993). In search of the impact of staff mix in long-term care ombudsman programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(1), 69-91.
15.
Kagle, J. D.
(1993). Record keeping: Directions for the 1990's. Social Work, 38(2), 190-196.
16.
Kautz, J. R.
(1990, June 28). Capacities of the state long term care ombudsman programs. A report presented to the Special Committee on Aging, U.S. Senate, 101st Congress.
17.
Kautz, J.
, Netting, F. E., Huber, R., Borders, K., & Davis, T. S. (1997). The Government Performance Results Act of 1993: Implications for social work practice. Social Work, 42(4) 364-373.
18.
Kusserow, R. P.
(1991, June). Ombudsman output measures: Management advisory report. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General.
19.
Monk, A.
, Kaye, W. L.,& Litwin, H. (1984). Resolving grievances in the nursing home: A study of the ombudsman program. New York: Columbia University Press.
20.
Murphy, J. W.
, & Pardeck, J. T. (1992). Computerization and the dehumanization of social services. Administration in Social Work, 16(2), 61-72.
21.
Nathanson, I. L.
, & Eggleton, E. (1993). Motivation versus program effect on length of service: Astudy of four cohorts of ombudservice volunteers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19(3/4), 95-114.
22.
National Association of State Units on Aging
. (1993, September). Placement of state and local ombudsman programs and operation of local ombudsman programs. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
Nelson, H. W.
(1995). Long-term care volunteer roles on trial: Ombudsman effectiveness revisited. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 23(3/4), 25-46.
24.
Nelson, H. W.
, Huber, R.,& Walter, K. L. (1995). The relationship between volunteer long-term care ombudsmen and regulatory nursing home actions. The Gerontologist, 35(4), 509-514.
25.
Nelson, H. W.
, Pratt, C. C., Carpenter, C. E.,& Walter, K. L. (1995). Factors affecting volunteer long-term care ombudsman organizational commitment and burnout. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(3), 213-233.
26.
Netting, F. E.
, Huber, R., & Kautz, J. R. (1995). Volunteer and paid long term care ombudsmen: Differences in complaint resolution. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 13(4), 10-21.
27.
Netting, F. E.
, Huber, R., Paton, R.,& Kautz, J. R. (1995). Elder rights: The role of the long-term care ombudsman program. Social Work, 40(3), 351-357.
28.
Netting, F. E.
, Paton, R. N.,& Huber, R. (1992). The long term care ombudsman program: What does the reporting system tell us?The Gerontologist, 32(6), 843-848.
29.
Office of the Inspector General
. (1993, April). State implementation of the ombudsman requirements of the Older Americans Act(OEI-02-91-01516). Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging and Office of Inspector General.
30.
Rock, B. D.
, Beckerman, A., Auerbach, C., Cohen, C., Goldstein, M., & Quitkin, E. (1995). Management of alternative level of care patients using a computerized database. Health & Social Work, 20(2), 133-139.
31.
Salina, D.
, Jason, L., & Lesondak, L. (1992). Improving data collection through collaborative research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 226-226.
32.
Schiman, C.
, & Lordeman, A. (1989a, December). A study of the involvement of state long term care ombudsman programs in board and care issues. Washington, DC: National Center for State Long Term Care Ombudsman Resources, National Association for State Units on Aging.
33.
Schiman, C.
, & Lordeman, A. (1989b, December). A study of the use of volunteers by long term care ombudsman programs: The effectiveness of recruitment, supervision, and retention. Washington, DC: National Center for State Long Term Care Ombudsman Resources, National Association for State Units on Aging.
34.
Semke, J. I.
, & Nurius, P. S. (1991). Information structure, information technology, and the human services organizational environment. Social Work, 36(4), 353-358.
35.
Williams, F. G.
, Netting, F. E., & Engstrom, K. M. (1991). Implementing computer information systems for hospital-based case management. Hospital and Services Administration, 36(4), 559-569.
