Important articles published in Learning Disability Quarterly (LDQ) during the years 1988 to 1998 were reviewed. Ten articles were identified with citations still occurring to date (2020–2025). These articles focused on strategy instruction, metacognition, fluency training, social skills, risk factors, and identification of children with learning disabilities across the United States. Also discussed during the 1988 to 1998 time were LDQ articles that focused on the limitations of discrepancy criteria, the narrowing of research focus, limitations of the null hypothesis related to intervention research, and the politics of knowledge that permeated the field at that time. The selected articles reviewed, based upon continuing citations in the last 5 years, have continued to yield an intellectual impact on the field of learning disabilities.
AdamsM. J.BruckM. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027480
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.).
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).
4.
ArdenS. V.PentimontiJ. M.CoorayR.JacksonS. (2018). A categorical content analysis of highly cited literature related to trends and issues in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417720931
5.
BerningerV. W.HartT.AbbottR.KarovskyP. (1992). Defining reading and writing disabilities with and without IQ: A flexible, developmental perspective. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511012
6.
BorkowskiJ. G.EstradaM. T.MilsteadM.HaleC. A. (1989). General problem-solving skills: Relations between metacognition and strategic processing. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510252
7.
*BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(10), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510390
8.
BoudahD. J.SchumacherJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511227
9.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1976). Psychological theory and the study of learning disabilities. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1059–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1059
10.
*BruckM. (1993). Component spelling skills of college students with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511325
11.
BryanT. H. (1976). Peer popularity of learning disabled children: A replication. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9(5), 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221947600900508
12.
CLD. (1998). Operationalizing the NJCLD definition of learning disabilities for ongoing assessment in schools. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(3), 186. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511080
13.
CookB. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528995
14.
CookB. G.TherrienW. J.FlemingJ. I.EspinasD.McLucasA. S.HodgesJ.FanX. (2026). Null effects in the special education research base. Remedial and Special Education, 47(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251361907
15.
CornoldiC. (1990). Metacognitive control processes and memory deficits in poor comprehenders. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510351
16.
*EnglertC. S.RaphaelT. E.FearK. L.AndersonL. M. (1988). Students’ metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(1), 18–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511035
17.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
18.
*FornessS. R.KavaleK. A. (1996). Treating social skill deficits in children with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511048
19.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S. (1998). Respecting the importance of science and practice: A pragmatic view. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(4), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511174
20.
GallagherJ. J. (1986). Learning disabilities and special education: A critique. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(10), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601901004
21.
GrahamS.Harbaugh-SchattenkirkA.AitkenA.HarrisK. R.NgC.RayA. (2022). Writing motivation questionnaire: Validation and application as a formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(2), 238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2080178
22.
*GrahamS.HarrisK. R.MacArthurC. A.SchwartzS. (1991). Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510517
23.
GrigorenkoE. L.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.WagnerR. K.WillcuttE. G.FletcherJ. M. (2020). Understanding, educating, and supporting children with specific learning disabilities: 50 years of science and practice. American Psychologist, 75(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000452
24.
HammillD. D.LeighJ. E.McNuttG.LarsenS. C. (1988). A new definition of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510766
25.
HarrisK. R.GrahamS.MacArthurC. A.ReidR.MasonL. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning processes and children’s writing. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (p. 187). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
26.
HarrisK. R.KimY.YimS.CampingA.GrahamS. (2023). Yes, they can: Developing transcription skills and oral language in tandem with SRSD instruction on close reading of science text to write informative essays at grades 1 and 2. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102150
27.
HumphreysM. S.LynchM. J.RevelleW.HallJ. W. (1983). Individual differences in short-term memory. In DillonR.SchmeckR. (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 35–63). Academic Press.
28.
*HutchinsonN. L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(1), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511158
KangS. H. K. (2024). Applying cognitive psychology to improve learning: Current developments and future directions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 13(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000196
31.
KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.LloydJ. W. (1998). Politics, science, and the future of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(4), 276–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511173
32.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R.LorsbachT. C. (1991). Definition for definitions of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510662
33.
KavaleK. A.FornessS. R.MacMillanD. L.GreshamF. M. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities: A rejoinder. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21(4), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511177
34.
KeoghB. K.Major-KingslyS.Omori GordonH.ReidH. P. (1982). A system of marker variables for the field of learning disabilities. In CruickshankW. (Ed.), Alexander R. Luria research monograph series (P. 96). Syracuse University Press.
35.
*LevyB. A.AbelloB.LysynchukL. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(3), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511307
36.
LovettM. W.SteinbachK. A. (1997). The effectiveness of remedial programs for reading disabled children of different ages: Does the benefit decrease for older children?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511308
37.
LyonG. R. (1999). Programmatic research in learning disabilities. In GallimoreR.BernheimerL. P.MacMillanD. L.SpeeceD. L.VaughnS. (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high-incidence disabilities (p. 261). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
38.
LyonG. R. (2005). Why scientific research must guide educational policy and instructional practices in learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593614
39.
MakiK. E.FloydR. G.RobersonT. (2015). State learning disability eligibility criteria: A comprehensive review. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000109
40.
*MercerC. D.JordanL.AllsoppD. H.MercerA. R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(4), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511208
41.
MeyerR. J.KeyesT.PenceP.Celedon-PattichisS.GalvánR. T.PoynorL. (2005). Cracks in the wall? Initiating actions against federal policy. In PoynorL.WolfeP. M. (Eds.), Marketing fear in America’s public schools: The real war on literacy (p. 167). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
42.
MoatsL. C.LyonG. R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(5), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949302600501
43.
*MorrisonG. M.CosdenM. A. (1997). Risk, resilience, and adjustment of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511092
44.
NelsonG.CookS. C.ZarateK.PowellS. R.MagginD. M.DrakeK. R.KissA. J.FordJ. W.SunL.EspinasD. R. (2022). A systematic review of meta-analyses in special education: Exploring the evidence base for high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 43(5), 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063491
45.
PressleyM.DukeN. K.BolingE. C. (2004). The educational science and scientifically based instruction we need: Lessons from reading research and policymaking. Harvard Educational Review, 74(1), 30–61. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.74.1.5445104446530382
46.
PressleyM.SymonsS.SnyderB. L.Cariglia-BullT. (1989). Strategy instruction research comes of age. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510249
47.
ReiffH. B.GerberP. J.GinsbergR. (1993). Definitions of learning disabilities from adults with learning disabilities: The insiders’ perspectives. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511133
48.
ReynoldsC. R. (1992). Two key concepts in the diagnosis of learning disabilities and the habilitation of learning. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510559
49.
RileyR. W. (1996). Improving the reading and writing skills of America’s students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 19(2), 67–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511248
50.
RosenbergM. S.BottD.MajsterekD.ChiangB.GartlandD.WessonC.GrahamS.Smith-MylesB.MillerM.SwansonH. L.BenderW.RiveraD.WilsonR. (1992). Minimum standards for the description of participants in learning disabilities research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510566
51.
SailorW.PaulJ. L. (2004). Framing positive behavior support in the ongoing discourse concerning the politics of knowledge. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060010601
52.
ShuF. (2021). Limitations of citation analysis on the measurement of research impact: A summary. Data Science and Informetrics, 1, 37–49. https://doi.org/10.59494/dsi.2021.3.4
53.
*SitlingtonP. L.FrankA. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510654
54.
StanovichK. E. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648254
55.
StanovichK. E. (1991). Conceptual and empirical problems with the discrepancy definitions of reading disability. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510663
56.
SwansonH. L. (1991). Operational definitions and learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(4), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510661
57.
SwansonH. L. (2000). Issues facing the field of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511098
58.
SwansonH. L.CarsonC.Saches-LeeC. (1996). A selective synthesis of intervention research for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 25(3), 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1996.12085826
59.
SwansonH. L.TrahanM. (1986). Characteristics of frequently cited articles in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698602000204
60.
TalbottE.LloydJ. W.TankersleyM. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511075
TraversJ. C.CookB. G.CookL. (2017). Null hypothesis significance testing and p-values. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12147
63.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education. (1968). Special Education for handicapped children, first annual report of the national advisory committee on handicapped children. U.S. Department of Health, Education, & Welfare, U.S. Office of Education.
64.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education. (1977). Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 42, G1082–G1085.
65.
VanderheydenA. M.SolomonB. G. (2023). Valid outcomes for screening and progress monitoring: Fluency is superior to accuracy in curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology, 38(3), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000528
66.
VanderveldenM. C.SiegelL. S. (1997). Teaching phonological processing skills in early literacy: A developmental approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511215
67.
WeissB.WeiszJ. R. (1995). Relative effectiveness of behavioral versus nonbehavioral child psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.317
68.
WhitehurstG. J.LoniganC. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132208
69.
WongB. Y.WongR.BlenkinsopJ. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents’ composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(4), 300–322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510212
70.
ZellE.RiveraS. M.StockusC. A. (2023). Political differences in knowledge and its connection with vaccination during COVID-19. Social Psychology, 54(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000517
