Although many social–emotional learning (SEL) surveys exist for the general student population, students with learning disabilities (SwLD) are often excluded during the survey development process, and the current SEL surveys often overlook critical SEL competencies for SwLD (e.g., self-advocacy), necessitating an SEL survey for SwLD. To address this oversight, the Winston Essential Skills Survey (WESS) was designed to measure SEL in an SwLD population. Annually, over a 4-year period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, two teachers evaluated each student with the WESS 2.0 (Nstudents = 809; Nteachers = 236). A confirmatory factor analysis suggested that this 41-item version of the WESS could be improved. A follow-up exploratory factor analysis indicated that 15 items could be dropped and that two items fit better under two other subscales, which improved the model fit of the eight-factor model substantially. This 26-item version of the WESS (WESS 3.0) also had evidence for internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and consensus (i.e., between the two evaluating teachers). Study 2 found that the WESS 3.0 has evidence for convergent, divergent, and discriminant validity. These findings suggest that the WESS 3.0 may be the first reliable and valid SEL survey specifically designed for SwLD.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
3.
BryanT.BursteinK.ErgulC. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities: A science-based presentation of the state of the art. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593631
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
6.
CohenJ.EspelageD. L. (Eds.). (2020). Feeling safe in school: Bullying and violence prevention around the world (Vol. 8). Harvard Education Press.
7.
CookC. R.FryeM.SlemrodT.LyonA. R.RenshawT. L.ZhangY. (2015). An integrated approach to universal prevention: Independent and combined effects of PBIS and SEL on youths’ mental health. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 30(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000102
8.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
9.
Daly-CanoM.VaccaroA.NewmanB. (2015). College student narratives about learning and using self-advocacy skills. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 213–227.
10.
DeBonoA. E.EnglishJ.HeimbauerM.MendelsohnE.CohenJ. (2023). Supportive environments providing social and emotional learning explain success in people with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2023-V28-I1-11671
11.
DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.MahoneyJ. L. (Eds.). (2024). Handbook of social and emotional learning. Guilford Publications.
12.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ SEL: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
13.
EliasM. J. (2004). The connection between social-emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593632
14.
ElksninL. K.ElksninN. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593627
15.
EspelageD. L.LowS.PolaninJ. R.BrownE. C. (2013). The impact of a middle school program to reduce aggression, victimization, and sexual violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.021
16.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
17.
FanW.WilliamsC. M.CorkinD. M. (2011). A multilevel analysis of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of social and academic risk factors. Psychology in the Schools, 48(6), 632–647. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20579
FryeK. E.BossD. L.AnthonyC. J.DuH.XingW. (2022). Content analysis of the CASEL framework using K–12 state SEL standards. School Psychology Review, 53(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2030193
20.
GabayY.Shamay-TsooryS. G.GoldfarbL. (2016). Cognitive and emotional empathy in typical and impaired readers and its relationship to reading competence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38(10), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1199663
21.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system: Rating scales. Pearson Assessments. https://doi.org/10.1037/t02650-000
22.
HillC. R.HughesJ. N. (2007). An examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(3), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.3.380
23.
HinkinT. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
24.
HolbeinJ. B. (2017). Childhood skill development and adult political participation. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000119
25.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
26.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
28.
JagersR. J.Rivas-DrakeD.WilliamsB. (2019). Transformative social and emotional learning (SEL): Toward SEL in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1623032
JonesS. M.DoolittleE. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning: Introducing the issue. The Future of Children, 27(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0000
LeeI. H.RojewskiJ. W.GreggN.JeongS. O. (2015). Postsecondary education persistence of adolescents with specific learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 49(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466914524826
33.
MaagJ. W.ReidR. (2006). Depression among students with learning disabilities: Assessing the risk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390010201
34.
MallettC. A. (2014). The “learning disabilities to juvenile detention” pipeline: A case study. Children & Schools, 36(3), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdu010
35.
McNaughtJ.PopeE. M. (2022). Youth leaders with learning disabilities and their decision to enroll in higher education. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 45(4), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/21651434221076063
36.
McWhirterJ. J.McWhirterB. T.McWhirterE. H.McWhirterA. C. (2017). At risk youth: A comprehensive response for counselors, teachers, psychologists, and human service professionals. Cengage Learning.
37.
MerrellK. W.GueldnerB. A.RossS. W.IsavaD. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
38.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Table 204.30. Public school enrollment in prekindergarten through 12th grade, by grade or grade equivalent and state or jurisdiction: Fall 2021 [Data set]. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d23/tables/dt23_204.30.asp
39.
PiersL.DuquetteC. A. (2016). Facilitating academic and mental health resilience in students with a learning disability. Exceptionality Education International, 26(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v26i2.7739
SharmaS.MukherjeeS.KumarA.DillonW. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
42.
ShechtmanZ.Abu YamanM. (2012). SEL as a component of a literature class to improve relationships, behavior, motivation, and content knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212441359
43.
SkladM.DiekstraR.RitterM. D.BenJ.GravesteijnC. (2012). Effectiveness of school-based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment?Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641
44.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.
45.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
TaylorR.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based SEL interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
48.
ThapaA.IceM.RamdassJ. V.CohenJ. (2014). Report on construct validity and internal consistency for the Qualities of a Sustainable and Independent Learner Scale. National School Climate Center.
49.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.GullottaT. P. (2015). Social and emotional learning: Past, present, and future. In DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice (pp. 3–19). Guilford.
52.
WestS. G.TaylorA. B.WuW. (2012). Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
WhiteG. W.SummersJ. A.ZhangE.RenaultV. (2014). Evaluating the effects of a self-advocacy training program for undergraduates with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(3), 229–244.
