This is an official position paper of the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD), of which the Council for Learning Disabilities has been a long-standing, active member. Response to intervention (RTI) is a critical component of a multi-tiered service delivery system. This NJCLD paper presents concerns related to the implementation of RTI and its use as the sole method of evaluation to determine the identification and eligibility for special education as a student with a specific learning disability (SLD) and implications for transition.
BaluR.ZhuP.DoolittleF.SchillerE.JenkinsJ.GerstenR. (2015). Evaluation of response to intervention practices for elementary school reading. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560820.pdf
5.
ComptonD.GilbertJ. K.JenkinsJ. R.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ChoE.BarqueroL. A.BoutonB. (2012). Accelerating chronically unresponsive children to Tier 3 instruction: What level of data is necessary to ensure selection accuracy?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442151
6.
FeiferS. (2008). Integrating response to intervention with neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Psychology in the Schools, 45(9), 812–845. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20328
7.
FletcherJ.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
8.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412442150
9.
GormleyS.HughesG.BlockL.LendmannC. (2005). Eligibility assessment requirements at the postsecondary level for students with learning disabilities: A disconnect with secondary schools?Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 18(1), 63–70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ846381.pdf
10.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467–519). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
11.
HaleJ. B.NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanA. S.KavaleK. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 58(1), 6–13, 29–30.
12.
HendricksE.FuchsD. (2020). Are individual differences in response to intervention influenced by the methods and measures used to define response? Implications for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420920379
13.
HintonV.FloresM.ShippenM. (2013). Response to intervention and math instruction. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 90–201.
KovaleskiJ.VanDerHeydenA.ShapiroE. (2013). The RTI approach to evaluating learning disabilities. The Guilford Press.
16.
LyonG. R.FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A.TorgesenJ. K.WoodF.SchulteA.OlsonR. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In Finn Jr.C. E.RotherhamA. J.HokansonC. R. Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259–287). Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. http://www.excellence.net/library/specialed/index.html
17.
MarstonD. (2001, August). A functional and intervention-based assessment approach to establishing discrepancy for students with learning disabilities [Paper presentation]. LD Summit, Washington, DC.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2007). The documentation disconnect for students with learning disabilities: Improving access to postsecondary disability services. http://www.ldonline.org/about/partners/njcld/
20.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2010). Comprehensive assessment and evaluation of students with learning disabilities. http://www.ldonline.org/about/partners/njcld/
21.
Public Law 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647, December32004.
22.
ReedD.CummingsK.AllenE.WeiserB.HottB.SmolkowskiK. (2014). Synthesis of research symposium at CLD’s 35th international conference on learning disabilities: Must reads for 2012–2013. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4), 230–240. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24570102
SchneiderW. J.KaufmanA. S. (2017). Let’s not do away with comprehensive cognitive assessments just yet. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32(1), 8–20. https://academic.oup.com/acn/article/32/1/8/2720677
