Explicit Text Structure Instruction Supports Expository Text Comprehension for Adolescents With Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review

Abstract

This systematic review article summarizes the effects of explicit text structure instruction on expository text comprehension for adolescents with learning disabilities or at risk for reading failure. A thorough literature search with four databases and backward citation search identified nine studies published in the past 22 years for inclusion in the review. The findings revealed medium to large effect sizes on expository reading comprehension outcome measures, providing moderately strong evidence in support of text structure intervention for adolescents with a diagnosis or risk of reading disabilities. Text structure instruction was more effective than standard instruction or business as usual conditions on students’ comprehension of a variety of expository text types and content area texts. Directions for further research, limitations, and educational implications are discussed.

Keywords

reading comprehension adolescent systematic review

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al Otaiba

Connor

C. M.

Crowe

. (2018). Promise and feasibility of teaching expository text structure: A primary grade pilot study. Reading and Writing, 31, 1997–2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9769-6

*Bakken

J. P.

Mastropieri

M. M.

Scruggs

T. E.

(1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699703100302

Beerwinkle

A. L.

Wijekumar

Walpole

Aguis

(2018). An analysis of the ecological components within a text structure intervention. Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2041–2064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9870-5

Bohaty

J. J.

(2015). The effects of a standard protocol intervention on the reading outcomes of 4th and 5th graders experiencing reading difficulties [Unpublished dissertation]. The University of Nebraska–Lincoln.

Catts

H. W.

Kamhi

A. G.

(2017). Prologue: Reading comprehension is not a single ability. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(3), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-16-0033

Cohen

(1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.

Connor

C. M.

Phillips

B. M.

Kaschak

Apel

Kim Al

Otaiba

Crowe

(2014). Comprehension tools for teachers: Reading for understanding from prekindergarten through fourth grade. Educational Psychology Review, 26(3), 39–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9267-1

Connor

C. M.

Phillips

B. M.

Kim

Lonigan

C. J.

Kaschak

M. P.

Crowe

Dombek

Al Otaiba

(2018). Examining the efficacy of targeted component interventions on language and literacy for third and fourth graders who are at risk of comprehension difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(6), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1481409

Ellis

P. D.

(2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.

10.

Gajria

Jitendra

A. K.

Sood

Sacks

(2007). Improving comprehension of expository texts in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400030301

11.

Gartland

Strosnider

(2018). Learning disabilities: Implications for policy regarding research and practice: A report by the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(4), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718789994

12.

Gersten

Fuchs

L. S.

Compton

Coyne

Greenwood

Innocenti

M. S.

(2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202

13.

Gersten

Fuchs

L. S.

Williams

J. P.

Baker

(2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279

14.

Gough

P. B.

Tunmer

W. E.

(1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

15.

Hall-Kenyon

K. M.

Black

S. B.

(2010). Learning from expository texts: Classroom-based strategies for promoting comprehension and context knowledge in the elementary grades. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 339–349.

16.

*Hebert

Bohaty

J. J.

Nelson

J. R.

Brown

(2016). The effects of text structure intervention on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000082

17.

Hebert

Bohaty

J. J.

Nelson

J. R.

Lambert

M. C.

(2018). Identifying and discriminating expository text structures: An experiment with 4th and 5th grade struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 31, 2115–2145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9826-9

18.

*Ihle

F. M.

(2011). Using language knowledge to comprehend academic discourse [Unpublished dissertation]. The University of Kansas.

19.

McMaster

K. L.

Espin

C. A.

van den Broek

(2014). Making connections: Linking cognitive psychology and intervention research to improve comprehension of struggling readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12026

20.

Meyer

B. J. F.

Brandt

D. M.

Bluth

G. J.

(1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 72–103. https://doi.org/10.2307/747349

21.

*Meyer

B. J. F.

Wijekumar

Middlemiss

Higley

Lei

Meier

Spielvogel

(2010). Web-based tutoring of the structure strategy with or without elaborated feedback or choice for fifth- and seventh-grade readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.1.4

22.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G

., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

23.

*Nealy

A. U.

(2003). The effects of instruction on expository text structure and use of graphic organizers on comprehension for young adolescents with learning disabilities [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Georgia.

24.

*O’Connor

R. E.

Beach

K. B.

Sanchez

Bocian

K. M.

Flynn

L. J.

(2015). Building BRIDGES: A design experiment to improve reading and United States history knowledge of poor readers in eighth grade. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563706

25.

*O’Connor

R. E.

Beach

K. B.

Sanchez

Bocian

K. M.

Roberts

Chan

(2017). Building better bridges: Teaching adolescents who are poor readers in 8th grade to comprehend history text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717698537

26.

*Pyle

Vasquez

A. C.

Lignugaris-Kraft

Gillam

S. L.

Peutzel

D. R.

Olszewski

Segura

Hartzheim

Laing

Pyle

(2017). Effects of expository text structure interventions on comprehension: A meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(4), 469–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.179

27.

RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.

28.

Ray

M. N.

Meyer

B. J. F.

(2011). Individual differences in children’s knowledge of expository text structures: A review of literature. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 67–82.

29.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

(2013). Science and social studies. In Swanson

H. L.

Harris

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 448–462). Guilford.

30.

Scruggs

T. E.

Mastropieri

M. A.

Cook

S. B.

Escobar

(1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11(4), 260–271. https://doi.org/1987-01969-001

31.

Smith

P. L.

Friend

(1986). Training learning disabled adolescents in a strategy for using text structure to aid recall of instructional prose. Learning Disabilities Research, 2(1), 38-44. https://doi.org/1989-20641-001

32.

Stevens

E. A.

Park

Vaughn

(2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for stuggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978-2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325177499

33.

U.S. Department of Education. (2018, January). Thirty-ninth annual report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: 2007. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2007/parts-b-c/index.html

34.

Weile

Schoonen

Kuiken

(2018). The role text structure inference skill plays for eighth graders’ expository text comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31, 2065–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9801-x

35.

What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (Version 3.0). Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf

36.

*Wijekumar

Meyer

B. J. F.

Lei

(2017). Web-based text structure strategy instruction improves seventh graders’ content area reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000168

37.

Williams

J. P.

Hall

K. M.

Laurer

K. D.

Stafford

K. B.

DeSisto

L. A.

de Cani

J. S.

(2005). Expository text comprehension in the primary grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.538

38.

Williams

J. P.

Pollini

Nubla-Kung

A. M.

Snyder

A. E.

Garcia

Ordynans

J. G.

Atkins

J. G.

(2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033215

39.

Williams

J. P.

Stafford

K. B.

Lauer

K. D.

Hall

K. M.

Pollini

(2009). Embedding reading comprehension training in content-area instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013152

40.

*Wilkins

(2007). Teaching expository text strategies to improve reading comprehension in low readers [Unpublished dissertation]. University of California, Riverside.

41.

Wolter

J. A.

Corbin-Lewis

K. N.

Self

Elsweiler

(2011). An evidence-based practice model across the academic and clinical settings. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740109344219

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB