The purpose of this review is to determine the evidence base classification of schema-based instruction (SBI) as an intervention to improve word problem-solving outcomes in mathematics for students with learning or mathematics disabilities in Grades K–12. Using the Council for Exceptional Children’s quality indicators (QIs) and standards, we reviewed both single-case and group design studies to classify the evidence of SBI. Results of this review indicate that SBI is a potentially evidence-based practice (EBP) for students with learning disabilities. Implications and directions for research and practice are presented.
BaddeleyA. (1992). Working memory: The interface between memory and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 281–288. doi:10.1162/jocn.1992.4.3.281
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
CookB. G.BuysseV.KlingnerJ. K.LandrumT. J.McWilliamR. A.TankersleyM.TestD. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 220–234. doi:10.1177/0741932514557271
4.
CookS. C.CookB. G.CookL. (2017). Classifying the evidence base of classwide peer tutoring for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptionality, 25, 9–25. doi:10.1080/09362835.2016.1196448
EdensK.PotterE. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17827.x
7.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003
8.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.. . .ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499–514. doi:10.1037/a0034341
9.
GarrettA. J.MazzoccoM. M.BakerL. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with or without math disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 77–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00208.x
10.
GastD. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78, 1343–1359. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069
12.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164. doi:10.1177/001440290507100202
13.
HegartyM.KozhevnikovM. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684
14.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71 (2), 165–179. doi: 10.1177/001440290507100203
15.
HuaY.Woods-GrovesS.KaldenbergE. R.LucasK. G.TherrienW. J. (2015). Effects of the TIP strategy on problem solving skills of young adults with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 31–42.
16.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J. (2016). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for secondary students with or at risk of learning disabilities: A literature review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 169–181. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12105
17.
JitendraA. K.DiPipiC. M.Perron-JonesN. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem—Solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23–38. doi:10.1177/00224669020360010301
18.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.StarJ. R.RodriguezM. C. (2016). The effects of schema-based instruction on the proportional thinking of students with mathematics difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 354–367. doi:10.1177/0022219414554228
19.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.HariaP.LehJ.AdamsA.KaduvettoorA. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third-grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 115–127. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115
20.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.McGoeyK.GardillM. C.BhatP.RileyT. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355. doi:10.1080/00220679809597564
21.
JitendraA. K.HoffK. (1996). The effects of schema-based instruction on the mathematical word-problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 422–431. doi:10.1177/002221949602900410
22.
JitendraA. K.HoffK.BeckM. M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50–64. doi:10.1177/074193259902000108
23.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83, 8–25. doi:10.1177/0014402915625062
24.
KalyugaS. (2006). Rapid cognitive assessment of learners’ knowledge structures. Learning and Instruction, 16, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.002
25.
KingsdorfS.KrawecJ. (2016). Assessing a multi-component math intervention within a cognitive-behavioral framework on the word problem-solving responses of a diverse group of third graders. Cogent Education, 3, 1160638. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1160638
26.
LiY.GearyD. C. (2013). Developmental gains in visuospatial memory predict gains in mathematics achievement. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e70160. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070160
27.
LipseyM. W.PuzioK.YunC.HebertM. A.Steinka-FryK.ColeM. W.. . . BusickM. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20133000/pdf/20133000.pdf
28.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
29.
MontagueM. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 37–44. doi:10.2307/30035524
30.
MorinL. L.WatsonS. M.HesterP.RaverS. (2017). The use of a bar model drawing to teach word problem solving to students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 91–104. doi:10.1177/0731948717690116
31.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
PalincsarA. S.BrownD. A. (1987). Enhancing instructional time through attention to metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 66–75. doi:10.1177/002221948702000201
34.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
35.
PowellS. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 94–108. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
36.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M. (2009). Effects of fact retrieval tutoring on third-grade students with math difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.01272.x
37.
RiccominiP. J.HwangJ.MoranoS. (2016). Developing mathematical problem solving through strategic instruction: Much more than a keyword. In CookB. G.TankersleyM.LandrumT.J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Instructional practices with and without empirical validity (Vol. 29, pp. 39–60). West Yorkshire, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
38.
RosenzweigC.KrawecJ.MontagueM. (2011). Metacognitive strategy use of eighth-grade students with and without learning disabilities during mathematical problem solving: A think-aloud analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 508–520. doi:10.1177/0022219410378445
39.
SharpE.DennisM. S. (2017). Model drawing strategy for fraction word problem solving of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 181–192. doi:10.1177/0741932516678823
40.
SteeleD. F.JohanningD. I. (2004). A schematic–theoretic view of problem solving and development of algebraic thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 65–90. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047054.90668.f9
41.
SwansonH. L. (2012). Cognitive profile of adolescents with math disabilities: Are the profiles different from those with reading disabilities?Child Neuropsychology, 18, 125–143. doi:10.1080/09297049.2011.589377
42.
SwansonH. L.JermanO.ZhengX. (2009). Math disabilities and reading disabilities: Can they be separated?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 175–196. doi:10.1177/0734282908330578
43.
SwansonH. L.LussierC.OroscoM. (2013). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions and cognitive moderators on word problem solving in children at risk for problem solving difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28, 170–183. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12019
44.
SwansonH. L.OroscoM. J.LussierC. M. (2014). The effects of mathematics strategy instruction for children with serious problem-solving difficulties. Exceptional Children, 80, 149–168. doi:10.1177/001440291408000202
45.
SweigartC. A.CollinsL. W.EvanovichL. L.CookS. C. (2016). An evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s quality indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 419–444. doi:10.1353/etc.2016.0019
46.
TraversJ. C.CookB. G.TherrienW. J.CoyneM. D. (2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 195–204. doi:10.1177/0741932516648462
47.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). National assessment of educational progress: Mathematics assessment. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/mathematics/
48.
van GarderenD. (2007). Teaching students with LD to use diagrams to solve mathematical word problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 540–553. doi:10.1177/00222194070400060501
49.
van GarderenD.MontagueM. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246–254. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00079
50.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
51.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. S. (2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 25–38. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00298.x
52.
WalkerD. W.PoteetJ. A. (1990). A comparison of two methods of teaching mathematics story problem-solving with learning disabled students. National Forum of Special Education Journal, 1, 44–51. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=wwcr%3Ay&pg=31&id=EJ408630
53.
WatsonS. M.GableR. A. (2010). Using knowledge of student cognition to differentiate instruction. In Reaching every learner: Differentiating instruction in theory and practice. Learn NC. Retrieved from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/every-learner/6693
54.
WatsonS. M.GableR. A. (2013). Unraveling the complex nature of mathematics learning disability: Implications for research and practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 178–187. doi:10.1177/0731948712461489
XinY. P. (2008). The effect of schema-based instruction in solving mathematics word problems: An emphasis on prealgebraic conceptualization of multiplicative relations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 526–551. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539313
57.
XinY. P.JitendraA. K.Deatline-BuchmanA. (2005). Effects of mathematical word problem—Solving instruction on middle school students with learning problems. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 181–192. doi:10.1177/00224669050390030501
