English learners (ELs) experience difficulty with mathematical problem solving because word problems require complex processes beyond basic math skills, such as the use of linguistic information, identifying relevant information, and constructing the appropriate problem statement. This study used a combined multiple baseline design and criterion changing design to assess the effectiveness of a paraphrasing intervention on the problem-solving performance for nine third-grade students who are ELs and at risk of mathematical disabilities (MD). Although the magnitude of the Tau-U effect sizes was in the small range, the visual analysis indicated that all students displayed increasing trends in problem-solving accuracy as a function of the paraphrasing intervention. The results were discussed in terms of providing continual support toward maintaining intervention outcomes.
FletcherJ. M.EpsyK. A.FrancisP. J.DavidsonK. C.RourkeB. P.ShaywitzS. E. (1989). Comparison of cutoff and regression-based definitions of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 334–338. doi:10.1177/002221948902200603
5.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2007). Mathematical problem solving. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 397–414). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
6.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CapizziA. M.. . . FletcherJ. M. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43.
7.
GarciaE.CuéllarD. (2006). Who are these linguistically and culturally diverse students?The Teachers College Record, 108, 2220–2246.
8.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.
GriffinC. (2007). Early intervention for children at risk for developing mathematical learning difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 373–395). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
13.
JanzenJ. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1010–1038.
KongJ. E.OroscoM. J. (2015). Word-Problem-Solving Strategy for Minority Students at Risk for Math Difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(3), 171-181. doi: 10.1177/0731948715607347.
MartinielloM. (2008). Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78, 333–368.
18.
MartinielloM. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14, 160–179.
19.
McIntoshS.VignolesA. (2001). Measuring and assessing the impact of basic skills on labour market outcomes. Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 453–481.
20.
MoranA. S.SwansonH. L.GerberM. M.FungW. (2014). The effects of paraphrasing interventions on problem-solving accuracy for children at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29, 97–105.
OroscoM. J. (2014). Word problem strategy for Latino English language learners at risk for math disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(1), 45–53.
23.
OroscoM. J.SwansonH. L.O’ConnorR.LussierC. (2013). The effects of dynamic strategic math on English language learners’ word problem solving. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 96–107.
24.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299.
25.
Rivera-BatizF. L. (1992). Quantitative literacy and the likelihood of employment among young adults in the United States. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 313–328.
26.
ShapkaJ. D.DomeneJ. F.KeatingD. P. (2006). Trajectories of career aspirations through adolescence and young adulthood: Early math achievement as a critical filter. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 347–358.
27.
SoaresD. A.HarrisonJ. R.VannestK. J.McClellandS. S. (2016). Effect size for token economy use in contemporary classroom settings: A meta-analysis of single-case research. School Psychology Review, 45, 379–399.
28.
SwansonH. L. (2006). Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 265–281.
29.
SwansonH. L.MoranA.LussierC.FungW. (2014). The effect of explicit and direct generative strategy training and working memory on word problem-solving accuracy in children at risk for math difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 111–123.
30.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO. (2011). Single Case Research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 1.0) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from singlecaseresearch.org
