The purpose of this exploratory study was to determine whether learning preferences of secondary students identified with concomitant learning disabilities (LD) and emotional disturbance (ED) align with the instructional method with which they best learned mathematics. Responses to a preference survey given before and after instruction were compared with learning outcomes in a single-subject, alternating treatments research design investigating the effects of direct teach, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), and a combination of both methods. Results showed that most students were able to predict, by choice or stated preference, conditions under which they will learn best and, in hindsight, indicate the condition that provided the best learning outcome. This small study contributes to the literature on secondary mathematics learning for students with LD, and makes unique contributions regarding (a) the learning of students with comorbid LD and ED and (b) implementation of instruction that combines direct teach with CAI.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanA. C. (2006) Applied behavior analysis for teachers (4th ed.). Englewood, Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
2.
BarlowD. H.HersenM. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
3.
BillingsleyG.ScheuermannB.WebberJ. (2009). A comparison of three instructional methods for teaching math skills to secondary students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 4–18.
4.
BryantB. R.OkM.KangE. Y.KimM. K.LangR.BryantD. P.PfannestielK. (2015). Performance of fourth-grade students with learning disabilities on multiplication facts comparing teacher-mediated and technology-mediated interventions: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 255–272. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9218-z
5.
BryantD. P.SmithD. D.BryantB. R. (2005). Who are students with learning disabilities? In BryantD. P.SmithD. D.BryantB. R. (Eds.), Teaching students with special needs in inclusive classrooms (pp. 49–54). Boston, MA: Pearson.
CortiellaC.HorowitzS. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
8.
DunlapG.DePerczelM.ClarkeS.WilsonD.WrightS.WhiteR.GomezA. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505–518. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-505
9.
DunnR.GriggsS. A.OlsonJ.BeasleyM.GormanB. S. (1995). A meta-analytic validation of the Dunn and Dunn model of learning-style preferences. The Journal of Educational Research, 88, 353–362. doi:10.1080/00220671.1995.9941181
10.
Every Student Succeeds Act. (2015). 20 U.S.C. § 6301.
11.
FornessS. R.KavaleK. A.BlumI. M.LloydJ. W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analyses: What works in special education and related services. Teaching exceptional children, 29(6), 4-9.
12.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39(1), 22–28.
13.
GastD. L. (2009). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
GearyD. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 23–27. doi:10.1177/0963721412469398
15.
Hagan-BurkeS.GilmourM. W.GerowS.CrowderW. C. (2015). Identifying academic demands that occasion problem behaviors for students with behavioral disorders: Illustrations at the elementary school level. Behavior Modification, 39, 215–241.
16.
HoangT.OshiroM. (2011). Research in reading interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education, 2011, 34–43. Retrieved from http://www.naset.org/3385.0.html
17.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
18.
HospM. K.HospJ. L. (2003). Curriculum-based measurement for reading, spelling, and math: How to do it and why. Preventing School Failure, 48, 10–17. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2003.10871074
19.
HottB. L.EvmenovaA.BrighamF. J. (2014). Effects of peer tutoring and academic self-monitoring on the mathematics vocabulary performance of secondary students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 113–132. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.libproxy.txstate.edu/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1134792
20.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 (2004).
21.
JeromeA.BarbettaP. M. (2005). The effect of active student responding during computer-assisted instruction on social studies learning by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(3), 13–23. doi:10.1177/016264340502000302
22.
JolivetteK.EnnisR. P.SwoszowskiN. C. (2017). Educator “what-ifs”: The feasibility of choice making in the classroom. Beyond Behavior, 26, 74–80.
23.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2013). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
24.
LandrumT. J.LandrumK. M. (2016). Learning styles, learning preferences, and student choice: Implications for teaching. Advances in Learning & Behavioral Disabilities, 29, 135–152. doi:10.1108/S0735-004X20160000029006
25.
LandrumT. J.McDuffieK. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. doi:10.1080/09362830903462441
26.
LaneK. L.CarterE. W.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 108–117. doi:10.1177/10634266060140020101
27.
LopesJ. (2005). Intervention with students with learning, emotional and behavioral disorders: Why do we take so long to do it?Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 345–360.
28.
MacciniP.MulcahyC. A.WilsonM. G. (2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 58–74. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00231.x
29.
MargariL.ButtiglioneM.CraigF.CristellaA.de GiambattistaC.MateraE.. . . SimoneM. (2013). Neuropsychopathological comorbidities in learning disorders. BMC Neurology, 13, Article 198. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/13/198
30.
MaritaS.HordC. (2017). Review of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 29–40. doi:10.1177/0731948716657495
31.
MattisonR. E.HooperS. R.GlassbergL. A. (2002). Three-year course of learning disorders in special education students classified as behavioral disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1454–1461. doi:10.1097/00004583-200212000-00017
32.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2006). Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.07.004
OliveM. L.SmithB. W. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313–324. doi:10.1080/0144341042000301238
35.
ReinerC.WillinghamD. T. (2010). The myth of learning styles. Change, 42(5), 32–35. doi:10.1080/00091383.2010.503139
36.
ScarboroughH.ParkerJ. (2003). Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychosocial problems from grade 2 to grade 8. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 47–71. doi:10.1007/s11881-003-0004-6
37.
ScheuermannB. K.HallJ. A. (2016). Positive behavioral supports for the classroom (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
38.
StultzS. L. (2017). Computer-assisted mathematics instruction for students with specific learning disability. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/0162643417725881
39.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 129–140. doi:10.1207/sldrp1403_1
40.
TempletonT. N.NeelR. S.BloodE. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 226–239. doi:10.1177/1063426608321691
41.
von MizenerB. H.WilliamsR. L. (2009). The effects of student choices on academic performance. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 110–128.
42.
WehbyJ.LaneK.FalkK. (2003). Academic instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 194–197.
