Upper elementary school students who have reading problems may have difficulty in one or more areas of reading, each requiring specific types of interventions. This study evaluated a short-term reading intervention for 46 fifth-grade students with poor reading comprehension. Students were randomly assigned to an intervention or no treatment control condition. The 40 session (20 hr) intervention targeted reading comprehension strategy instruction in the context of informational science texts. Analyses showed statistically significant effects favoring the intervention on two proximal measures (i.e., measures closely related to the intervention content). The effects for the outcomes were moderate (gs = 0.61 and 0.72). There were no statistically significant differences on distal measures (i.e., measures less closely aligned with the intervention). The findings provide support for the efficacy of a reading comprehension intervention that may inform short-term interventions within a Response to Intervention framework.
ArcherA. L.GleasonM. M.VachonV. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 89–101.
2.
BreauxK. (2009). WIAT-III Technical Manual. San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
3.
BruceM. E.ChanL. S. (1991). Reciprocal teaching and transenvironmental programming: A program to facilitate the reading comprehension of students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 12(5), 44–54.
4.
CattsH. W.ComptonD. L.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. doi:10.1037/a0025323
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.EllemanA. M.GilbertJ. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329–337. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.003
EdmondsM. S.VaughnS.WexlerJ.ReutebuchC. K.CableA.TackettK. K.SchnakenbergJ. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
10.
EnglertC.ThomasC. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 93–105.
11.
Faggella-LubyM.WardwellM. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications of a Tier 2 reading comprehension study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 35–49.
12.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.MathesP.SimmonsD. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174–206.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
GajriaM.SalviaJ. (1992). The effects of summarization instruction on the text comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 508–516.
17.
GerstenR.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
18.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
19.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.WilliamsJ. P.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
20.
GrahamL.WongB. L. (1993). Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: Didactic and self-instructional training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 270–279.
21.
GravesA. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disability Research, 1, 90–100.
22.
GravesA. W.DuesberyL.PyleN. B.BrandonR. R.McIntoshA. S. (2011). Two studies of Tier II literacy development: Throwing sixth graders a lifeline. The Elementary School Journal, 111, 641–661. doi:10.1086/659036
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108–446, § 601, Stat. 2647. (2004).
25.
JenkinsJ. R.HeliotisJ. D.SteinM. L.HaynesM. C. (1987). Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children, 54, 54–59.
26.
JitendraA. K.HoppesM.XinY. (2000). Enhancing main idea comprehension for students with learning problems: The role of a summarization strategy and self-monitoring instruction. Journal of Special Education, 34, 127–139.
27.
JohnsonL.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1997). The effects of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension strategy: A study of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 80–91.
28.
KamilM. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
29.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.SchummJ. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3–22.
MaloneL.MastropieriM. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270–279.
35.
MasonL. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questions: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283–296.
MellardD.McKnightM.JordanJ. (2010). RTI tier structures and instructional intensity. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 217–225. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00319.x
38.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects K–5. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
39.
NelsonJ. R.SmithD. J.DoddJ. M. (1992). The effects of teaching a summary skills strategy to students identified as learning disabled on their comprehension of science text. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 228-243.
40.
O’SullivanR. (2003). Protecting sea turtles. Washington, DC: National Geographic School Publishing.
41.
PetscherY.SchatschneiderC. (2011). A simulation study on the performance of the simple difference and covariance-adjusted scores in randomized experimental designs. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48, 31–43. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00129.x
RaphaelT. E.AuK. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. Reading Teacher, 59, 206–221.
44.
RitcheyK. D.SpeeceD. L.SilvermanR. D.MontanaroE. (n.d.). Assessment of strategy knowledge and use for information text (ASKIT): Sea turtles (Form A). College Park: University of Maryland.
45.
ScammaccaN.RobertsG.VaughnS.EdmondsM.WexlerJ.ReutenbuchC. K.TorgesenJ. K. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: Research Corporation.
46.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
47.
SpeeceD. L.RitcheyK. D.SilvermanR.SchatschneiderC.WalkerC.AndrusikK. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258–276.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.FletcherJ. M.DentonC. A.. . . FrancisD. J. (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3–21.
50.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.PearsonN. A. (2010). Test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension. Austin, TC: Pro-Ed.
53.
WanzekJ.WexlerJ.VaughnS.CiulloS. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889–912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
54.
WongB. L.JonesW. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normally achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.
55.
WongB. L.WilsonM. (1984). Investigating awareness of a teaching passage organization in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 477–482.
