Researchers and practitioners indicate students require explicit instruction on mathematics vocabulary terms, yet no study has examined the effects of an embedded vocabulary component within mathematics tutoring for early elementary students. First-grade students with mathematics difficulty (MD; n = 98) were randomly assigned to addition tutoring with an embedded vocabulary component, addition tutoring without the embedded vocabulary component, or business-as-usual control. At posttest, students who received addition tutoring without vocabulary demonstrated greater gains than control students on addition fluency. On a measure of mathematics vocabulary, students in the active tutoring conditions demonstrated improved performance on mathematics vocabulary over control students. Results indicate that exposure to addition tutoring with or without an embedded vocabulary component positively improves mathematics vocabulary performance.
AnderssonU. (2010). Skill development in different components of arithmetic and basic cognitive functions: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study of children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 115–134. doi:10.1037/a0016838
2.
BaumannJ. F.GravesM. F. (2010). What is academic vocabulary?Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54, 4–12. doi:10.1598/JAAL.54.1.1
3.
Bay-WilliamsJ. M.LiversS. (2009). Supporting math vocabulary acquisition. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 238–245.
4.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.HammillD. D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168–177. doi:10.1177/002221940003300205
5.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23. doi:10.1177/001440291107800101
6.
BryantD. P.GoodwinM.BryantB. R.HigginsK. (2003). Vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 117–128. doi:10.2307/1593594
7.
BunchG. C. (2006). “Academic English” in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 284–301. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.007
8.
CapraroM.JoffrionH. (2006). Algebraic equations: Can middle-school students meaningfully translate from words to mathematical symbols?Reading Psychology, 27, 147–164. doi:10.1080/02702710600642467
9.
CarlisleJ. F.KenneyC. K.VerebA. (2013). Vocabulary instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: Promising approaches for learning from texts. In ChardD. C.CookB. G.TankersleyM. G. (Eds.), Research-based strategies for improving outcomes in academics (pp. 47–60). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
10.
CoyneM. D.SimmonsD. C.Kame’enuiE. J.StoolmillerM. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12, 145–162. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1203_3
11.
CumminsJ. (2000). Academic language learning, transformative pedagogy, and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 537–548.
12.
DowkerA. (2005). Early identification ad intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324–332.
13.
DunstonP.TyminskiA. (2013). What’s the big deal about vocabulary?Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19, 38–45.
14.
EbbersS. M.DentonC. A. (2008). A root awakening: Vocabulary instruction for older students with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 90–102. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00267.x
15.
Ernst-SlavitG.MasonM. R. (2011). “Words the hold us up”: Teacher talk and academic language in five upper elementary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22, 430–440. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.004
16.
EspinC. A.BuschT. W.ShinJ.KruschwitzR. (2001). Curriculum-based measurement in content areas: Validity of vocabulary-matching as an indicator of performance in social studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 142–151. doi:10.1111/0938-8982.00015
17.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
18.
FuchsL. S.HamlettC. L.PowellS. R. (2003). Fact fluency assessment. Available from L. S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.
19.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 89–100. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003
20.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M. (2010). A framework for remediating number combination deficits. Exceptional Children, 76, 135–156.
21.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173. doi:10.1177/001440290807400202
22.
FusonK. S.SecadaW. G. (1986). Teaching children to add by counting-on with one-handed finger patterns. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 229–260.
23.
GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.HoardM. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concepts deficits in children with a learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2561
24.
GilmoreC. S.McCarthyS. E.SpelkeE. S. (2007). Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature, 447, 589–591. doi:10.1038/nature05850
25.
GoerssB. L.BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1999). Increasing remedial students’ ability to derive word meaning from context. Reading Psychology, 20, 151–175. doi:10.1080/027027199278457
26.
HarmonJ. M.HedrickW. B.WoodK. D. (2005). Research on vocabulary instruction in the content areas: Implications for struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 261–280. doi:10.1080/10573560590949377
27.
IvesB. (2007). Graphic organizers applied to secondary algebra instruction for students with learning disorders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 110–118.
28.
JitendraA. K. (2002). Teaching students math problem-solving through graphic representations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 34–38.
29.
JitendraA. K.EdwardsL. L.SacksG.JacobsonL. A. (2004). What research says about vocabulary instruction for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70, 299–322. doi:10.1177/001440290407000303
30.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R.StarostaK.LehJ. M.SoodS.CaskieG.. . . MackT. R. (2009). Improving seventh grade students’ learning of ratio and proportion: The role of schema-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 250–264. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.001
31.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B.KaplanD. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834–850.
32.
JordanN. C.LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ. (1995). Calculation abilities in young children with different patterns of cognitive functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 53–64. doi:10.1177/002221949502800109
33.
JoshiR. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21, 209–219.
34.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.FallerS. E.KelleyJ. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 196–228. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.3
35.
LiptonJ. S.SpelkeE. S. (2005). Preschool children’s mapping of number words to nonsymbolic numerosities. Child Development, 76, 978–988. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00891.x
36.
MarstonD. (2005). Tiers of intervention in responsiveness to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 539–544. doi:10.1177/00222194050380061001
37.
MartinR.CirinoP.BarnesM.Ewing-CobbsL.FuchsL.StuebingK.FletcherJ. (2013). Prediction and stability of mathematics skill and difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 428–443. doi:10.1177/0022219411436214
38.
MatthewsP.Rittle-JohnsonB. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge: Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.004
39.
MillerS. P.HudsonP. J. (2006). Helping students with disabilities understand what mathematics means. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39, 28–35.
40.
MonroeE. E.OrmeM. P. (2002). Developing mathematical vocabulary. Preventing School Failure, 46, 139–142.
MonroeE. E.PendergrassM. R. (1997). Effects of mathematical vocabulary instruction on fourth grade students. Reading Improvement, 34, 120–132.
43.
NagyW.TownsendD. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 91–108. doi:10.1002/RRQ.011
44.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
45.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards Mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
PowellS. R. (2015). The influence of symbols and equations on understanding mathematical equivalence. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 266–272.
48.
PowellS. R.DriverM. K. (2013). First-grade mathematics vocabulary.
49.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 381–394. doi:10.1037/a0018447
50.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.CirinoP. T.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2015). Effects of a multi-tier support system on calculation, word-problem, and pre-algebraic performance among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children, 81, 443–470.
51.
The Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test—Second edition. San Antonio, TX: Author.
52.
PullenP. C.TuckwillerE. D.KonoldT. R.MaynardK. L.CoyneM. D. (2010). A tiered intervention model for early vocabulary instruction: The effects of tiered instruction for young students at risk for reading disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 110–123. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00309.x
53.
ReikeråsE. K. L. (2009). A comparison of performance in solving arithmetical word problems by children with different levels of achievement in mathematics and reading. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 1, 49–72.
54.
RobertsN. S.TruxawM. P. (2013). For ELLS: Vocabulary beyond the definitions. The Mathematics Teacher, 107, 28–34.
55.
RubensteinR. N.ThompsonD. R. (2002). Understanding and supporting children’s mathematical vocabulary development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9, 107–112.
56.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23, 135–159. doi:10.1080/10573560601158461
57.
ShalevR. S.AuerbachJ.ManorO.Gross-TsurV. (2000). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and prognosis. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 58–64. doi:10.1007/s007870070009
58.
ShalevR. S.ManorO.Gross-TsurV. (2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 121–125. doi:10.1017/S0012162205000216
59.
TerrillC.ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (2004). SAT vocabulary instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39, 288–294. doi:10.1177/10534512040390050501
60.
TownsendD.FilippiniA.CollinsP.BiancarosaG. (2012). Evidence for the importance of academic word knowledge for the academic achievement of diverse middle school students. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 497–518. doi:10.1086/663301
61.
VukovicR. K. (2012). Mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty: Findings and implications from a four-year longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 78, 280–300. doi:10.1177/001440291207800302
62.
VukovicR. K.LesauxN. K. (2013). The relationship between linguistic skills and arithmetic knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 87–91. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.007
