This article examines the efficacy of a multitiered systemic reading intervention for increasing the intensity and quality of explicit literacy instruction that teachers provide in first-grade classrooms. Schools (j = 16) were randomly assigned to the treatment or comparison condition. In both conditions, teachers (i = 42) provided 90 min of Tier I reading instruction to first-grade students (n = 883). In the treatment condition, Tier I classroom teachers were trained to enhance their core reading instruction by making instruction more explicit and intensive through standardized protocols and ongoing coaching support. At-risk treatment students (n = 240) also received an additional 30 min of Tier II supplemental reading intervention that was highly aligned with Tier I instruction. The focus of this study is on the Tier I portion of the multitiered intervention and the impact of the Tier I Enhancing Core Reading Instruction intervention on teacher practices. Results indicate positive effects of the Tier I intervention on the quality of explicit instruction and the frequency and accuracy of group practice opportunities provided to students.
Al OtaibaS.ConnorC. M.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.MeadowsJ.LiZ. (2011). Assessment data-informed guidance to individualize kindergarten reading instruction: Findings from a cluster-randomized control field trial. Elementary School Journal, 111, 535–560.
2.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Exploring the foundations of explicit instruction. In ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (Eds.), Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
AusubelD. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
BakerS.FienH.BakerD. (2010). Robust reading instruction in the early grades: Conceptual and practical issues in the integration and evaluation of Tier 1 and Tier 2 instructional supports. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42, 1–20.
5.
BakerS. K.FienH.SantoroL.ChardD.ParkY. (in press). An evaluation of an explicit read aloud intervention taught in whole-classroom formats in first grade.Elementary School Journal.
6.
BatscheG.ElliottJ.GradenJ. L.GrimesJ.KovaleskiJ. F.PrasseD.TillyW.D. (2006). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
7.
BrophyJ.GoodT. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In WitrockM. (Ed.), The third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
8.
BrownsonR. C.BakerE. A.LeetT. L.GillespieK. N.TrueW. R. (2011). Evidence-based public health (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
CarlisleJ. F.KelceyB.RowanB.PhelpsG. (2011). Teachers’ knowledge about early reading: Effects on students’ gains in reading achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 289–321.
10.
CarnineD. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513–521.
11.
CarnineD.KameenuiE. (1992). Higher order thinking: Designing curriculum for mainstreamed students. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12.
CarrollC.PattersonM.WoodS.BoothA.RickJ.BalainS. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 1–9.
13.
ChardD. J.JungjohannK. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for success in mathematics learning, intersection: Mathematics education sharing common grounds. Houston, TX: Exxon-Mobil Foundation.
14.
ChardD. J.Kame’enuiE. J. (2000). Struggling first-grade readers: The frequency and progress of their reading. Journal of Special Education, 34, 28–38.
15.
ChwaliszK.DollingerC. S. (2009). Evidence-based practice with family caregivers. In FrankR. G.CaplanB. R.RosenthalM. (Eds.), Handbook of rehabilitation psychology (2nd ed., pp. 301–312). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
ClarkeB.SmolkowskiK.BakerS.K.FienH.Chard (2011). The impact of a comprehensive tier 1 kindergarten curriculum on the achievement of students at-risk in mathematics.Elementary School Journal, 111, 561-584.
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CookB. G.CookS. C. (2011). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. Journal of Special Education. Advance online publication.
19.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE.CarnineD. (2006). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
20.
DesimoneL. M.PorterA. C.GaretM.YoonK. S.BirmanB. (2002). Does professional development change teachers’ instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112.
21.
DuncanG. J.MurnaneR. J. (Eds.). (2011). Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
ElsteinA. (2004). On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and medical decision making. Inflammation Research, 53, 184–189. doi:10.1007/s00011-004-0357-2
24.
EricssonK. A.RoringR. W.NandagopalK. (2007). Giftedness and evidence for reproducibly superior performance: An account based on the expert performance framework. High Ability Studies, 18, 3–56. doi:10.1080/13598130701350593
25.
FienH.SmithJ. L. M.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K.Nelson-WalkerN. J.ChaparroE. A. (in press). An examination of the efficacy of a systemic intervention in early reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
26.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI publication No. 231). Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute.
27.
FrankeM. L.CarpenterT. P.LeviL.FennemaE. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 653–689.
28.
FuchsD.ComptonD. L.FuchsL. S.BryantJ.DavisG. N. (2008). Making “secondary intervention” work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21, 413–436.
29.
GaretM. S.PorterA. C.DesimoneL.BirmanB. F.YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.
30.
GaretM. S.WayneA. J.StancavageF.TaylorJ.EatonM.WaltersK.DoolittleF. (2011). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011-4024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
31.
GawandeA. (2009). The checklist manifesto: How to get things right. New York, NY: Metropolitan.
32.
GerstenR. M. (1999). Lost opportunities: Challenges confronting four teachers of English-language learners. Elementary School Journal, 100, 37–56.
33.
GerstenR. M.ChardD.BakerS. K. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 444–457.
34.
GerstenR. M.ComptonD.ConnorC. M.DiminoJ.SantoroL.Linan-ThompsonS.TillyW. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades: A practice guide (No. NCE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation.
35.
GerstenR. M.DiminoJ.JayanthiM.KimJ.SantoroL. (2009). An investigation of the impact of the teacher study group as a means to enhance the quality of reading comprehension and vocabulary instruction for first graders in reading first schools: Technical report. Los Alamitos, CA: Instructional Research Group.
36.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205.
37.
GunnB.BiglanA.SmolkowskiK.AryD. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic Students in early elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 34, 90–104. doi:10.1177/002246690003400204
38.
GuyattG. H.KirshnerB.JaeschkeR. (2009). Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 1341–1345.
39.
HanushekE. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30, 466–479.
40.
HarnB.Linan-ThompsonS.RobertsG. (2008). Intensifying instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 115–125.
41.
HeckD. J.BanilowerE. R.WeissI. R.RosenbergS. L. (2008). Studying the effects of professional development: The case of the NSF’s local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 113–152.
42.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128.
43.
HowellK. W.NoletV. (2000). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
44.
KentS. C.WanzekJ.Al OtaibaS. (2012). Print reading in general education kindergarten classrooms: What does it look like for students at-risk for reading difficulties?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27, 56–65.
45.
KlingnerJ. K.VaughnS.HughesM. T.ArguellesM. E. (1999). Sustaining research-based practices in reading: A 3-year follow-up. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 263–274.
46.
KratochwillT. R.ShernoffE. S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Promoting evidence-based interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 389–408.
47.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
48.
MarshJ. A.McCombsJ. S.LockwoodJ. R.MartorellF.GershwinD.NaftelS. . . . CregoA. (2008). Supporting literacy across the sunshine state. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
49.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP): 2011 Reading Assessment. Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
50.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
51.
National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52.
O’ConnorR. E.HartyK. R.FulmerD. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532–538.
53.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53–61.
54.
PiantaR. C.MashburnA. J.DownerJ. T.HamreB. K.JusticeL. (2008). Effects of web-mediated professional development resources on teacher–child interactions in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 431–451.
55.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
56.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2008). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
57.
RupleyW. H.BlairT. R.NicholsW. D. (2009). Effective reading instruction for struggling readers: The role of direct/explicit teaching. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25, 125–138. doi:10.1080/10573560802683523
58.
SeftorN.ConstantineJ.CodyS.PonzaM.KnabJ.DekeJ.MonahanS. (2011). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook 2011 (NCEE 2011-XXXX). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
59.
ShoukriM.AsyaliM.DonnerA. (2004). Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13, 251–271.
60.
SilvermanS. (1985). Relationship of engagement and practice trials to student achievement. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 13–21.
61.
SimmonsD. C.CoyneM. D.KwokO. M.McDonaghS.HarnB. A.Kame’enuiE. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention a longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 158–173.
62.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
63.
SmolkowskiK.GunnB. (2012). Reliability and validity of the Classroom Observations of Student–Teacher Interactions (COSTI) for kindergarten reading instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 316–328.
64.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65.
StermanJ. D. (2006). Learning from evidence in a complex world. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 505–514. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.066043
66.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H. (2001). Exploring the relation between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and the academic behavioral outcomes of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121.
67.
VaughnS.CirinoP. T.Linan-ThompsonS.MathesP. G.CarlsonC. D.HaganE.FrancisD. J. (2006). Section on teaching, learning, and human development: Effectiveness of a Spanish intervention and an English intervention for English learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 449–489.
68.
VellutinoF.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experimental deficits as basic cause of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
69.
WalkerH. M. (2004). Use of evidence-based intervention in schools: Where we’ve been, where we are, and where we need to go. School Psychology Review, 33, 398–407.
70.
WalkerH. M.GreshamF. (2003). School related behavior disorders. In ReynoldsW.MillerG. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 511–530). New York, NY: Wiley.
71.
WarrenS. F.FeyM. E.YoderP. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
72.
WatkinsC.SlocumT. (2004). The components of direct instruction. In Marchand-MartellaN. E.SlocumT. A.MartellaR. C. (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28–65). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
73.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2011). What Works Clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook (Version 2.1). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation.
74.
YoonK. S.DuncanT.LeeS. W. Y.ScarlossB.ShapleyK. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007 No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
