This intervention study compared the efficacy of small-group tutoring on the mathematics learning of third-grade students at risk for mathematics difficulty using either a school-provided standards-based curriculum (SBC) or a schema-based instruction (SBI) curriculum. The SBI curriculum placed particular emphasis on the underlying mathematical structure of additive problems to represent and solve word problems. At-risk students (N = 136) from 35 classrooms scoring below a proficiency level on their district accountability assessment were assigned randomly to treatment groups. Results indicated interaction effects on the word problem-solving (WPS) posttest and retention tests such that SBI students with higher incoming (pretest) WPS scores outperformed SBC students with higher pretest scores, whereas SBC students with lower pretest scores outperformed SBI students with lower pretest scores. No effects were found on number combinations automaticity, and mathematics and reading achievement. Implications to improve the problem-solving performance of at-risk students are discussed.
AlfieriL.BrooksP. J.AldrichN. J.TenenbaumH. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017
2.
AnderssonU. (2008). Mathematical competencies in children with different types of learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 48–66. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.48
3.
BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73.
4.
CarpenterT. P.MoserJ. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179–202. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/748348
5.
ClarkeB.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K.HankF.DoablerC. T.ChardD. J. (2011). The impact of a comprehensive Tier I core kindergarten program on the achievement of students at risk in mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 111, 561–584. doi:10.1086/659033
6.
ColdbergP.BushW. (2003). Using metacognitive skills to improve 3rd graders’ math problem solving. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 5(10), 29–48.
EdensK.PotterE. (2006). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108, 184–196. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17827.x
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563–573. doi:10.1177/00222194020350060701
10.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.SteubingK.FletcherJ. M.HamlettC. L.LambertW. (2008). Problem solving and computational skill: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 30–47. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.30
11.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.. . .ZumetaR. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576. doi:10.1037/a0014701
12.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173.
13.
GearyD. C.HamsonC. O.HoardM. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2561
14.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
15.
GerstenR.JordanN.C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
16.
GreerB. (1997). Modeling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 293–307. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(97)00006-6
17.
HanichL. B.JordanN. C.KaplanD.DickJ. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615–626. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.615
18.
HowellD. C. (2001). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
19.
JitendraA. K. (2007). Solving math word problems: Teaching students with learning disabilities using schema-based instruction. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
20.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.McGoeyK.GardillM. C.BhatP.RileyT. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345–355.
21.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC.HariaP.LehJ.AdamsA.KaduvetoorA. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 115–127. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.115
22.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 567–578. doi:10.1080/00220679809597564
23.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B.KaplanD. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834–850. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00571
24.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.HanichL. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586–597. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.586
25.
JordanN. C.MontaniT. O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624–634, 648. doi:10.1177/002221949703000606
26.
KalyugaS. (2006). Rapid cognitive assessment of learners’ knowledge structures. Learning and Instruction, 16, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.learningstruc.2005.12.002
27.
KalyugaS. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509–539. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
28.
KirschnerP. A.SwellerJ.ClarkR. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologists, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985
29.
KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H.MaasC. J. M. (2004). Effectiveness of explicit and constructivist mathematics instruction for low-achieving students in the Netherlands. Elementary School Journal, 104, 233–251.
30.
MarshallS. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children: The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 7–28). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
33.
National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. In CrossC. T.WoodsT. A.SchweingruberH. (Eds.), Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12519&;page=R1
34.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2003). Technical manual for the NWEA Measures of Academic Progress and Achievement Level Tests. Lake Oswego, OR: Author.
35.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2010). Measures of Academic Progress. Lake Oswego, OR: Author.
36.
ParmarR. S.CawleyJ. R.FrazitaR. R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without math disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415–429.
37.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S. (2010). Contribution of equal-sign instruction beyond word-problem tutoring for third-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 381–394. doi:10.1037/a0018447
38.
QuinteroA. H. (1983). Conceptual understanding in solving two-step word problems with a ratio. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 102–112.
39.
RileyM. S.GreenoJ. G.HellerJ. J. (1983). Development of children’s problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In GinsburgH. (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
40.
Rittle-JohnsonB.StarJ. R.DurkinK. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 836–852. doi:10.1037/a0016026
41.
RussellR. L.GinsburgH. P. (1984). Cognitive analysis of children’s mathematical difficulties. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 217–244. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_3
42.
SlavinR. E.LakeC. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 427–515. doi:10.3102/0034654308317473
43.
SunS.PanW.WangL. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 989–1004. doi:10.1037/a0019507
44.
SwansonH. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 471–491. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471
45.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities. New York, NY: Guilford.
46.
Technical Education Research Center. (2008). Investigations in number, data, and space. Glenview, IL: Pearson Scott Foresman.
47.
Van LuitJ. E. H.NaglieriJ. A. (1999). Effectiveness of the MASTER program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 98–107. doi:10.1177/002221949903200201
48.
Vilenius-TuohimaaP. M.AunolaK.NurmiJ. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28, 409–426. doi:10.1080/01443410701708228
