This study investigates the multiple stress creep-recovery behavior of hybrid carbon/Agave woven composites. Agave fibers were extracted using mechanical, chemical, and biological methods, with tensile tests identifying the chemical treatment (3H NaOH) as slightly superior. Five woven configurations were fabricated: Taffeta weaves of carbon (CTT) and Agave (ATT), hybrid carbon-Agave (HCA), hybrid Agave-carbon (HAC), and hybrid mixed (HMT) weaves with alternating fibers. Tensile tests were conducted at speeds of 0.1, 1, and 10 mm/s. Results show that testing speed significantly affects mechanical response. ATT exhibited the highest deformation, indicating compliance, while HMT showed the lowest strain, reflecting stiffness. HCA and HAC displayed intermediate behaviors, balancing flexibility and strength. These findings suggest ATT is suitable for energy-absorbing applications such as damping or cushioning, whereas HMT is better suited for load bearing or fatigue-critical components. The study highlights the potential of tailoring hybrid woven composites’ mechanical properties through fiber selection, arrangement, and testing conditions.
PickeringKLEfendyMGALeTM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2016; 83: 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
5.
MerzougABouhamidaBSereirZ, et al.Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical thermal performance of date palm/glass fiber hybrid composites. J Ind Textil2022; 51(5): 7599S–7621S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720958036
6.
HamamousseKSereirZBenzidaneR, et al.Experimental and numerical studies on the low-velocity impact response of orthogrid epoxy panels reinforced with short plant fibers. Compos Struct2019; 211: 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.005
7.
SreekumarPASelvin ThomasPSaiterJM, et al.Viscoelastic and thermal properties of eco-friendly composites fabricated by resin transfer molding. J Reinforc Plast Compos2011; 30(17): 1509–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684411420894
8.
MohammedLAnsariMNMPuaG, et al. A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int J Polym Sci. 2015; 243947.
9.
ShahDU. Developing plant fibre composites for structural applications by optimising composite parameters: a critical review. J Mater Sci2013; 48: 6083–6107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7458-7
SahaSDasSRahmanMZ. Hybridization in natural fiber composites: enhanced performance and sustainability. Compos B Eng2026; 308(1 January 2026): 112986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112986
12.
WongDFabitoGDebnathS, et al.A critical review: recent developments of natural fiber/rubber reinforced polymer composites. Clean Mater2024; 13: 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100261
13.
AhmedRHasan ManikKNathA, et al.Recent advances in sustainable natural fiber composites: environmental benefits, applications, and future prospects. Mater Today Sustain2025; 32: 101220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtsust.2025.101220
RiaraMMMerengaASMigwiCM. Creep and recovery behavior of compression molded low density polyethylene/cellulose composites. Journal of Polymers2013; 2013: 209529. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/209529
16.
KhanMZSrivastavaSKGuptaM. Tensile and flexural properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: a review. J Reinforc Plast Compos2018; 37(24): 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684418799528
AchaBAReboredoMMMarcovichNE. Creep and dynamic mechanical behavior of PP–jute composites: effect of interfacial adhesion. Composites Part A2007; 38: 1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.003
SalaBGabrionXTrivaudeyF, et al.Influence of stress level and hygrothermal conditions on creep/recovery behaviour of high-grade flax and hemp fibre reinforced GreenPoxy composites. Composites Part A2021; 141: 106204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106204
21.
MazurRLOliveiraPCRezendeMC, et al.Environmental effects on viscoelastic behavior of carbon fiber/PEKK composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2014; 33(8): 749–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684413515955
22.
JacobMJoseSThomasS, et al.Stress relaxation and thermal analysis of hybrid biofiber reinforced rubber biocomposites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2006; 25(18): 1903–1917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684406069919
MostafaNHIsmarrubieZSapuanS, et al.Effect of equi-biaxially fabric prestressing on the tensile performance of woven E-glass/polyester composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2016; 35(14): 1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684416638553
26.
López-SantosFHernández-PérezALedesma-OrozcoE, et al. Prediction of elastic properties of woven polymer composites using micromechanical models and measured microstructural parameters. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2026; 45(3–4): 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241273025
27.
GibsonRF. Principles of composite material mechanics. 4th ed.CRC Press, 2016.
28.
SayanBBhavaniVS. Mechanical properties of hybrid composites using finite element method based micromechanics. Composites: Part B. 2014; 58: 318–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.065
PickeringKLEfendyMGALeTM. A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing; 83: 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038
BidimaIIA-MNEfezeDNEbandaFB, et al.Modeling of mechanical behavior of Agave sisalana fiber’s yarn using the design of experiments method. Results Mater2024; 23: 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2024.100605
WeiHDingWZhouD. Experimental, analytical and numerical investigation on tensile behavior of twisted fiber yarns. Chin J Aeronaut2021; 34(5): 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.006
43.
NarayanTWittelFStöckigtA. The strength and stiffness of oriented wood and cellulose-fibre materials: a review. Prog Mater Sci2022; 125: 100916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100916
AusiasGTorres-TelloEVRomero-SánchezL, et al.Effect of agave fiber content in the thermal and mechanical properties of green composites based on polyhydroxybutyrate or poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate). Ind Crop Prod2017; 99: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.035
46.
BoussoufiAErrouaneLSereirZ, et al.Vibration behavior of partially bio-sourced sandwich panel with stiffened core: analytical and experimental study. Advances in Aircraft and Spacecraft Science2022; 9(3): 169–193. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2022.9.3.169
47.
BerrekheroukhNSereirZVivetA, et al.Experimental and numerical models to study creep behavior of unidirectional Alfa fiber composites. Mech Time-Dependent Mater2022; 26(3): 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11043-022-09880-5
48.
AmraneASereirZPoilâneC, et al.Effect of form factor and mass fraction of Alfa short fibers on mechanical behavior of Alfa/Greenpoxy biocomposite. Rev Compos Matériaux Avancés2019; 29(4): 185–191. https://doi.org/10.18280/rcma.290401
49.
AdjalYSereirZBenzidaneR, et al.Vibration of damaged biocomposite beams reinforced with random short Alfa fibers. Advances in Aircraft and Spacecraft Science2021; 8(2): 127–149. https://doi.org/10.12989/aas.2021.8.2.127
50.
OrtegaZCastellanoJSuárezL, et al.Characterization of Agave americana L. as a source of fibres for composites. SN Appl Sci2019; 1: 987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1022-2
51.
MsahliSJaouadiMSakliF, et al.Mechanical properties of fibres extracted from Tunisian Agave americana L. J Nat Fibers2015; 12(6): 552–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2014.984046
52.
MansouriABen NasrJBen AmarM, et al.Characterization of fiber extracted from Agave americana after burial in soil. Fibers Polym2020; 21(4): 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-020-8666-9
53.
LaouiciHBenkhelladiADrouicheF, et al.Study of thermal and mechanical properties of fibers extracted from Algerian Agave americana L. and their polymer composites. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences and Advanced Materials2024; 1: 1–7.
54.
MsahliSChaabouniYSakliF, et al.Mechanical behavior of Agave americana L. fibres: correlation between fine structure and mechanical properties. J Appl Sci2007; 7(24): 3951–3957. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.3951.3957
55.
6GebretsadikTTTesfayAHGebruAG, et al.Characterization and comparative insights on Agave americana and Agave sisalana leaf fibers for high-performance applications. J Nat Fibers2023; 20(2): 2246648, Article 2246648. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2023.2246648
56.
AnZChengXZhaoD, et al.Tensile and compressive properties ofWoven fabric carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates containing three-dimensional microvascular channels. Polymers2024; 16: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050665
57.
WeatherburnAMontgomeryCScottG, et al.Biomimetic polypropylene-carbon intra-ply hybrid 3D woven composite with enhanced impact resistance. Compos Struct2025; 366: 119177, Article 119177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119177
58.
KureemunURavandiMTranLQN, et al.Effects of hybridization and hybrid fibre dispersion on the mechanical properties of woven flax-carbon epoxy at low carbon fibre volume fractions. Compos B Eng2018; 134: 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.035
59.
AlvyMSAHossainMFRanaMS, et al.Influence of stacking sequences of woven jute-carbon hybrid composites: diffusion mechanism and mechanical characterization. Heliyon2024; 10(17): e36632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36632
60.
SenthilkumarKSubramaniamSUngtrakulT, et al.Dual cantilever creep and recovery of sisal/hemp hybrid biocomposites. J Ind Textil2020; 51(2_suppl): 2372S–2390S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720961416
61.
MuthukumarMPrasathJSathishS, et al. 3D layer-to-layer orthogonal interlock woven composites under monotonic loading: multiscale modeling. J Reinforc Plast Compos. 2017; 36(17): 1263–1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417706555
62.
BegumSFaziaSHashmiMSJ. Polymer matrix composites with natural and synthetic fibers. Advanced Materials Processing Technologies2020; 6: 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2020.1728645
63.
OrnaghiHLAlmeidaHJMonticeliFM, et al.Stress relaxation, creep and recovery of carbon fiber non-crimp fabric composites. Composites Part C2020; 3: 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100051
64.
KafiAAbedinMZBegMDH, et al.Mechanical properties of jute/glass fibre polyester hybrid composites: UV radiation modification. J Reinforc Plast Compos2006; 25: 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684405056437
ZeeshanMAliMAnjumAS, et al.Optimization of mechanical and thermal properties of glass/flax/waste cotton hybrid composites. J Ind Textil2021; 51: 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083719891420
67.
AchaABReboredoMMMarcovichNE. Creep and dynamic mechanical behavior of PP–jute composites: effect of the interfacial adhesion. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38A(6): 1507–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.003
68.
BenjaminSXavierGFrédériqueT, et al.Influence of the stress level and hygrothermal conditions on the creep/recovery behaviour of high-grade flax and hemp fibre reinforced GreenPoxy matrix composites. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 141: 106204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106204
69.
SenthilkumarKSubramaniamSUngtrakulT, et al.Dual cantilever creep and recovery behavior of sisal/hemp fibre reinforced hybrid biocomposites: effects of layering sequence, accelerated weathering and temperature. J Ind Textil2020; 51(2_suppl): 2372S–2390S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083720961416
