Carbon fiber-resin composite multi-layer shells are widely used due to their light weight and high strength. However, traditional layup design heavily relies on empirical parameters, making it difficult to match the interlaminar mechanical properties with application requirements. Moreover, most existing studies on layup optimization only rely on simulation analysis and lack experimental verification for the reliability of optimization results. In this study, a finite element model is established based on COMSOL Multiphysics, and the BOBYQA (Boundary Optimization by Quadratic Approximation) algorithm is adopted to optimize the layup angles of a 6-layer composite shell, with the objective of minimizing the maximum Hashin failure index. Innovatively, the effectiveness of simulation optimization is indirectly verified by experimentally measuring the reduction in maximum normal stress, addressing the gap of missing experimental evidence in existing optimization studies. Numerical simulation and experimental verification are carried out on the experimental model of this work. Results show that the optimized model exhibits reductions of 28.9%, 16.1%, and 31.0% in maximum normal stress, von Mises stress, and Hashin failure index, respectively. Combined simulation and experimental evidence confirm that the optimization scheme significantly alleviates stress concentration, promotes uniform internal stress transfer, and improves structural strength.
ZhuKLiuSZhangW, et al.Research progress of new bulletproof composite materials: a review. AATCC J Res2025; 12(1): 24723444241288295. https://doi.org/10.1177/24723444241288295
LiuYNatsukiTSuzukiD, et al.Low-velocity impact-resistance of aramid fiber three-dimensional woven textile-reinforced thermoplastic-epoxy composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 37(9): 2827–2857. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057231216741
6.
AdinHAdinMŞ. Effect of particles on tensile and bending properties of jute epoxy composites. Mater Test2022; 64(3): 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2021-2038
7.
ErkekBAdinMŞKosedagE, et al.Effects of artificial hydrothermal aging on crush boxes made from glass, carbon and aramid fiber-reinforced hybrid composites. Polymers2026; 18(2): 249. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18020249
8.
AndrewJJSrinivasanSMArockiarajanA, et al.Parameters influencing the impact response of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite materials: a critical review. Compos Struct2019; 224: 111007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111007
9.
SchipperenJHA. An anisotropic damage model for the description of transverse matrix cracking in a graphite–epoxy laminate. Compos Struct2001; 53(3): 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-8223(01)00013-7
10.
MohamedYSWanBChangL, et al.Experimental and numerical study of the effects of fiber orientation on stress concentration of CFRE. J Reinforc Plast Compos2025; 44(17-18): 1205–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844241238834
11.
MaSLiHFeiJ, et al.Flexible-rigid scalable structures for trans-scale interface reinforcement of carbon fiber/phenolic composites: effect on properties. Composites Part B2023; 258: 110703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110703
12.
AdinMŞAdinH. Machining eco-friendly jute fiber-reinforced epoxy composites using specially produced cryo-treated and untreated cutting tools. Polymers2024; 16(23): 3329. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16233329
13.
GuenanouAHoumatACheboutR, et al.Layer-wise optimization of elliptical laminates with curvilinear fibers. Mech Adv Mater Struct2023; 30(3): 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.2015809
14.
TsirogiannisECDaskalakisEVogiatzisC, et al.Advanced composite armor protection systems for military vehicles: design methodology, ballistic testing, and comparison. Compos Sci Technol2024; 251: 110486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110486
15.
YanJDuanZLundE, et al.Concurrent multi-scale design optimization of composite frames with manufacturing constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim2017; 56(3): 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1750-0
16.
HongZNiJLiangK, et al.Strength optimization of manufacturable variable stiffness laminates with asymmetric layups considering coupling deformation. Compos Struct2025; 370: 119279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119279
17.
GaoYYanSMinK, et al.Interfacial strength vs toughness: enhancing mechanical and impact performance of CF/PEEK thermoplastic composites. Chem Eng J2025; 518: 164646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.164646
LiuJQuanDScarselliG, et al.Developments and future prospects of welding technology for carbon fiber thermoplastic composites. Composites Part B2025; 297: 112314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112314
20.
PowellMJ. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge NA Rep2009; 6: 26–46.
21.
CartisCFialaJMarteauB, et al.Improving the flexibility and robustness of model-based derivative-free optimization solvers. ACM Trans Math Software2019; 45(3): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338517
DasTKGhoshPDasNC. Preparation, development, outcomes, and application versatility of carbon fiber-based polymer composites: a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2019; 2(2): 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-018-0072-z
26.
HashinZRosenBW. The elastic moduli of fiber-reinforced materials. J Appl Mech1964; 31(2): 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3629590
27.
LiZZengZShenQ, et al.Status of art and prospects in cutting force modeling and control optimization strategies for carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP). J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025: 08927057251344579.
28.
TsaiSW. Structural behavior of composite materials. NASA CR1964; 71.
LianHChristiansenANTortorelliDA, et al.Combined shape and topology optimization for minimization of maximal von Mises stress. Struct Multidiscip Optim2017; 55(5): 1541–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1656-x
31.
WangYKuLSuoS, et al.Finite element analysis on von Mises stress distributions of Si DSP. Mater Sci Semicond Process2013; 16(1): 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2012.05.005
32.
Marciniak-CzochraAMikelićA. A rigorous derivation of the equations for the clamped biot-kirchhoff-love poroelastic plate. Arch Ration Mech Anal2015; 215(3): 1035–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-014-0805-2
WangXShiG. A simple and accurate sandwich plate theory accounting for transverse normal strain and interfacial stress continuity. Compos Struct2014; 107: 620–628.
35.
ZareiAKhosravifardA. A meshfree method for static and buckling analysis of shear deformable composite laminates considering continuity of interlaminar transverse shearing stresses. Compos Struct2019; 209: 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.077
36.
KimIBSong-HakUSinSH. Global stiffness determination of a cross-ply laminated composite plate with distributed delaminations and matrix cracks and its application. Compos Struct2020; 233: 111586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111586
37.
TalrejaR. Stiffness properties of composite laminates with matrix cracking and interior delamination. Eng Fract Mech1986; 25(5-6): 751–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90038-x
38.
SchukraftJFünknerMZhangF, et al.Microstructural and mechanical investigations regarding the formability of glass fiber reinforced thermoplastic pultruded profiles. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2025: 08927057251412780. https://doi.org/10.1177/08927057251412780
39.
LiRKellyDCroskyA. An evaluation of failure criteria for matrix induced failure in composite materials. Compos Struct2002; 57(1-4): 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00106-x
40.
Yuan-ShengC. Physical interpretation of Hashin's criterion of fatigue failure under multiaxial stress. Eng Fract Mech1986; 24(2): 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90048-2
ZhouRWangYQiaoB, et al.Impact force identification on composite panels using fully overlapping group sparsity based on Lp-norm regularization. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(1): 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217231165701
43.
PartA. Curriculum vitae (CVA). Comput Sci2000; 79: 164.
44.
El SaidBIvanovDLongAC, et al.Multi-scale modelling of strongly heterogeneous 3D composite structures using spatial voronoi tessellation. J Mech Phys Solid2016; 88: 50–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.12.024
45.
KressG. Examination of Hashin’s failure criteria for part B of the second world-wide failure exercise: Comparison with test data. J Compos Mater2013; 47(6-7): 867–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998312460260
46.
TrombiniMEneaMArrudaMRT, et al.1D higher-order theories for quasi-static progressive failure analysis of composites based on a full 3D Hashin orthotropic damage model. Composites Part B2024; 270: 111120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111120
47.
ZhengTGuoLSunR, et al.Investigation on the compressive damage mechanisms of 3D woven composites considering stochastic fiber initial misalignment. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2021; 143: 106295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106295
