Concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars, partially or fully replacing steel, can effectively meet the durability requirements of structures in corrosive environments. Axial compression tests were conducted on four groups of concrete columns with hybrid (mixed) reinforcement and single-type reinforcement. The results show that all specimens failed by concrete splitting, with several longitudinal bars buckling and extensive the concrete cover spalling at failure. In terms of ductility, specimens with hybrid longitudinal reinforcement and GFRP stirrups exhibited the highest value. Under conventional steel stirrup conditions, variations in longitudinal reinforcement configuration minimally affected ductility, whereas specimens reinforced entirely with GFRP bars exhibited the lowest ductility. The ultimate load capacity formula, which comprehensively accounts for the contributions of both longitudinal and transverse reinforcement, yielded theoretical values in close agreement with the experimental results. The test results indicate that the utilization rate of stirrups at the mid-height of hybrid reinforcement columns is greater than that in columns with only ordinary steel or only GFRP reinforcement. The reinforcement configuration showed little influence on the mechanical performance of the concrete itself in the columns. In terms of longitudinal reinforcement utilization, the hybrid steel-GFRP-reinforced columns performed better than those reinforced with GFRP bars alone.
ChenXZhangLYuH, et al.Mechanical performance and durability evolution of high-performance concrete components exposed to western salt Lake environment. Constr Build Mater2025; 490: 142582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142582
WangYXiongZWangX, et al.Deterioration mechanism and hardness degradation for GFRP bars used in marine concrete structures. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 20: e02932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e02932
6.
WenSCaoM. Review on degradation behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer bars in marine environments. J Mater Sci2023; 58(24): 9861–9893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08667-1
7.
SunJHSuNJHeZQ, et al.Durability of concrete-encapsulated GFRP bars subjected to seawater immersion. Case Stud Constr Mater2024; 20: e03249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03249
8.
YounisAEbeadUSuraneniP, et al.Short-term flexural performance of seawater-mixed recycled-aggregate GFRP-reinforced concrete beams. Compos Struct2020; 236: 111860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111860
9.
SadraieHKhalooASoltaniH. Dynamic performance of concrete slabs reinforced with steel and GFRP bars under impact loading. Eng Struct2019; 191: 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.038
10.
RobertMBenmokraneB. Combined effects of saline solution and moist concrete on long-term durability of GFRP reinforcing bars. Constr Build Mater2013; 38: 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.021
TuJGaoKHeL, et al.Experimental study on the axial compression performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete square columns. Adv Struct Eng2019; 22(7): 1554–1565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433218817988
13.
PanYWangJMogulAP, et al.Enhanced durability assessment of GFRP and HFRP bars embedded in mortar under simulated seawater exposure. J Build Eng2025; 111: 113563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113563
14.
ChenZLiSZhouJ, et al.Flexural behavior of GFRP bars reinforced seawater sea sand concrete beams exposed to marine environment: experimental and numerical study. Constr Build Mater2022; 349: 128784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128784
15.
HasanHASheikhMNHadiMN. Analytical investigation on the load-moment characteristics of GFRP bar reinforced circular NSC and HSC columns. Constr Build Mater2018; 183: 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.042
16.
HasanHASheikhMNHadiMN. Maximum axial load carrying capacity of fibre reinforced-polymer (FRP) bar reinforced concrete columns under axial compression. Structure2019; 19: 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.12.012. Elseviers.
17.
MarananGBManaloACBenmokraneB, et al.Shear behaviour of geopolymer-concrete beams transversely reinforced with continuous rectangular GFRP composite spirals. Compos Struct2018; 187: 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.080
18.
AlAjarmehOSManaloACBenmokraneB, et al.Axial performance of hollow concrete columns reinforced with GFRP composite bars with different reinforcement ratios. Compos Struct2019; 213: 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.096
LamHFYangJAuSK. Bayesian model updating of a coupled-slab system using field test data utilizing an enhanced markov chain monte carlo simulation algorithm. Eng Struct2015; 102: 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.005
21.
SeghierMEABKechtegarBAmarMN, et al.Simulation of the ultimate conditions of fibre-reinforced polymer confined concrete using hybrid intelligence models. Eng Fail Anal2021; 128: 105605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105605
22.
ZengJJYeYYGaoWY, et al.Stress-strain behavior of polyethylene terephthalate fiber-reinforced polymer-confined normal-high-and ultra high-strength concrete. J Build Eng2020; 30: 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101243
23.
Al-AkhrasNAl-MashraqiM. Repair of corroded self-compacted reinforced concrete columns loaded eccentrically using carbon fiber reinforced polymer. Case Stud Constr Mater2021; 14: e00476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00476
24.
XuJWuZJiaH, et al.Axial compression of seawater sea sand concrete columns reinforced with hybrid FRP–stainless steel bars. Mag Concr Res2023; 75(13): 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.22.00249
25.
PrakashAPriyadharshaniSARaoSV. Durability and structural integrity of columns reinforced with various combinations of steel and GFRP bars. Case Stud Constr Mater2025; 23: e05017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05017
26.
RabczukTBelytschkoT. A three-dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2007; 196(29-30): 2777–2799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.06.020
27.
RabczukTBelytschkoT. Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng2004; 61(13): 2316–2343. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1151
28.
SamaniegoEAnitescuCGoswamiS, et al.An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: concepts, implementation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2020; 362: 112790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112790
29.
JiangJFWuYF. Identification of material parameters for drucker–prager plasticity model for FRP confined circular concrete columns. Int J Solid Struct2012; 49(3-4): 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.10.002
30.
LiBJiangJXiongH, et al.Improved concrete plastic-damage model for FRP-confined concrete based on true tri-axial experiment. Compos Struct2021; 269: 114051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114051
31.
ShenDLiMKangJ, et al.Experimental studies on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column joints strengthened with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer sheets. Constr Build Mater2021; 287: 122901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122901
32.
VilanovaITorresLBaenaM, et al.Numerical simulation of bond-slip interface and tension stiffening in GFRP RC tensile elements. Compos Struct2016; 153: 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.048
33.
KhorramianKSadeghianP. New mechanics-based confinement model and stress–strain relationship for analysis and design of concrete columns wrapped with FRP composites. Structures2021; 33: 2659–2674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.06.012. Elsevier.
34.
SaberiHBuiTQFurukawaA, et al.FRP-confined concrete model based on damage-plasticity and phase-field approaches. Compos Struct2020; 244: 112263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112263
35.
YeJ. Principles of structural design. 5th ed.China Communications Press, 2021.
36.
MohamedHMAfifiMZBenmokraneB. Performance evaluation of concrete columns reinforced longitudinally with FRP bars and confined with FRP hoops and spirals under axial load. J Bridge Eng2014; 19(7): 04014020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000590
37.
TobbiHFarghalyASBenmokraneB. Behavior of concentrically loaded fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns with varying reinforcement types and ratios. ACI Struct J. 2014; 111(2): 375–386.
JiaD.Seismic performance of pier columns with double-layer GFRP bar–steel reinforcement considering the degradation of the tensile properties of GFRP bars [Ph.D. dissertation]. Harbin, China: Harbin Engineering University; 2021. (In Chinese).
BaenaMTorresLTuronA, et al.Experimental study of bond behaviour between concrete and frp bars using a pull-out test. Composites Part B Engineering2009; 40(8): 784–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.003
44.
LeeJYKimTYKimTJ, et al.Interfacial bond strength of glass fiber reinforced polymer bars in high-strength concrete. Composites Part B Engineering2008; 39(2): 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.03.008
45.
YooDYKwonKYParkJJ, et al.Local bond-slip response of gfrp rebar in ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. Compos Struct2015; 120: 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.055
46.
RollandAQuiertantMKhadourA, et al. Experimental investigations on the bond behavior between concrete and frp reinforcing bars. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 173: 136–148.
