To enhance the interfacial bonding between carbon fiber (CF) and epoxy resin (EP), this study employed electrochemical oxidation to modify the CF surface. Electrochemical oxidation of CFs was conducted using phosphoric acid (H3PO4), ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (NH4H2PO4), and a 1:1 mixed electrolyte, followed by systematic evaluation of their impacts on surface morphology, microstructure, chemical composition, tensile strength, and interfacial shear strength (IFSS). The results showed that H3PO4 treatment led to significant etching and an increase in active functional groups but caused greater fiber strength loss. In contrast, NH4H2PO4 treatment resulted in milder etching, less strength degradation, and the introduction of C-N functional groups, yielding higher IFSS compared to H3PO4-treated CFs. The mixed electrolyte achieved an optimal balance, combining effective surface modification with better strength retention. The IFSS of CFs treated with the mixed electrolyte increased to 60.20 MPa-a 55% improvement over the unmodified system-attributed to enhanced physical and chemical interactions at the interface. This work demonstrates a promising electrochemical oxidation strategy for surface modification of fibers, holding considerable potential for applications in advanced composite materials.
ChukovDNematulloevSTorokhovV, et al.Effect of carbon fiber surface modification on their interfacial interaction with polysulfone. Results Phys2019; 15: 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102634
XingYSongSWuD, et al. Enhancing interface performance: designing a novel energy‐absorbing coating for carbon fiber composites with brittle shells and flexible spherical cores. Polym Compos. 2025; 46(13): 11762–11773. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29709
4.
QianXZhangYGWangXF, et al.Effect of carbon fiber surface functionality on the moisture absorption behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites. Surf Interface Anal2016; 48(12): 1271–1277. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.6031
5.
PatchenAYoungSPenumaduD. An investigation of mechanical properties of recycled carbon fiber reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete. Materials2022; 16(1): 314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010314
6.
Abdul GhafarASHajjajSSHGsangayaKR, et al.Design and development of a robot for spraying fertilizers and pesticides for agriculture. Mater Today Proc2023; 81: 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.174
7.
JawaidMThariqMSabaN. Mechanical and physical testing of biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites. *Woodhead Publ. Ser. Compos. Sci. Eng.*. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing, 2019.
8.
YusofNSBSapuanSMSultanMTH, et al.Design and materials development of automotive crash box: a review. Cienc. Tecnol. Mater2017; 29(3): 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctmat.2017.09.003
MaLZhuYWangM, et al.Enhancing interfacial strength of epoxy resin composites via evolving hyperbranched amino-terminated POSS on carbon fiber surface. Compos Sci Technol2019; 170: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.001
11.
LiangYTuoZZhaoQ, et al.Study on preparation and mechanical properties of bionic carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composite with eagle feather structure. Mater Res Express2021; 8(6): 065301. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac0368
12.
WangXQianXZhangY, et al.Surface oxidation of PAN-Based ultrahigh modulus carbon fibers (UHMCFs) and its effect on the properties of UHMCF/EP composites. Carbon Lett2020; 31(3): 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00173-7
13.
QianXWangXOuyangQ, et al.Effect of ammonium-salt solutions on the surface properties of carbon fibers in electrochemical anodic oxidation. Appl Surf Sci2012; 259: 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.025
14.
YaoTTWuGPSongC. Interfacial adhesion properties of carbon fiber/polycarbonate composites by using a single-filament fragmentation test. Compos Sci Technol2017; 149: 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.06.017
15.
KimDKAnKHBangYH, et al.Effects of electrochemical oxidation of carbon fibers on interfacial shear strength using a micro-bond method. Carbon Lett2016; 19: 32–39. https://doi.org/10.5714/cl.2016.19.032
16.
LiWLiRLiC, et al.Surface characterization and electrical property of carbon fibers modified by air oxidation. Surf Interface Anal2015; 47(3): 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.5711
17.
JiaoWCaiYLiuW, et al.Preparation of carbon fiber unsaturated sizing agent for enhancing interfacial strength of carbon fiber/vinyl ester resin composite. Appl Surf Sci2018; 439: 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.226
18.
LiFLiuYQuCB, et al.Enhanced mechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polyethersulfone composites by graphene oxide coating. Polymer2015; 59: 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.12.067
19.
JiangSLiQWangJ, et al. Multiscale graphene oxide-carbon fiber reinforcements for advanced polyurethane composites. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2016; 87: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.004
20.
LiWYaoSYMaKM, et al.Effect of plasma modification on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber/phenolphthalein polyaryletherketone composites. Polym Compos2013; 34(3): 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.22385
21.
EvoraMCAraujoJRFerreiraEHM, et al.Localized surface grafting reactions on carbon nanofibers induced by gamma and e-beam irradiation. Appl Surf Sci2015; 335: 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.02.024
22.
WuDYaoZSunX, et al.Mussel-tailored carbon fiber/carbon nanotubes interface for elevated interfacial properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Chem. Eng. J2022; 429: 132449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132449
23.
ZhaoBGaoHLiS, et al.Surface modification of carbon fiber by electro-polymerization: continuous production, thickness control, colorization, and preparation of CFRP. ACS Appl Polym Mater2020; 2(7): 2594–2601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c00232
24.
DharmasiriBRandallJDStanfieldMK, et al.Using surface grafted poly(acrylamide) to simultaneously enhance the tensile strength, tensile modulus, and interfacial adhesion of carbon fibres in epoxy composites. Carbon2022; 186: 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.10.046
25.
VautardFFiouxPVidalLC, et al.Use of plasma polymerization to improve adhesion strength in carbon fiber composites cured by electron beam. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6(3): 1662–1674. https://doi.org/10.1021/am4045663
26.
QinRTianYZhengLB, et al.Studying the growth of carbon nanotubes on carbon fibers surface under different catalysts and electrochemical treatment conditions. Fullerenes, Nanotub Carbon Nanostruct2017; 25(3): 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383x.2016.1273905
27.
FanWWangYChenJ, et al.Controllable growth of uniform carbon nanotubes/carbon nanofibers on the surface of carbon fibers. RSC Adv2015; 5(92): 75735–75745. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra15556h
28.
DuanZLiWLiuH, et al.Synergetic improvement of interfacial performance and impact resistance of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composite via continuous electrochemical oxidation. Polymers-basel2025; 17(8): 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17081007
29.
XiaoJTianSZhouH, et al.Construction of polar functional groups on the surface of a high-modulus carbon fiber and its effect on the interfacial properties of composites. ACS Omega2023; 8(32): 29262–29269. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c02596
30.
FuYLuYYouT, et al.Study on multistage anodization for high‐modulus carbon fiber. Surf Interface Anal2019; 51(8): 798–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.6651
31.
YuanXZhuBCaiX, et al.Influence of different surface treatments on the interfacial adhesion of graphene oxide/carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Appl Surf Sci2018; 458: 996–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.161
32.
KimKWJeongJSAnKH, et al. A study on the microstructural changes and mechanical behaviors of carbon fibers induced by optimized electrochemical etching. Compos Part B Eng. 2019; 165: 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.055
33.
JiangJYaoXXuC, et al. Influence of electrochemical oxidation of carbon fiber on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber/graphene oxide/epoxy composites. Compos Part A-Appl S. 2017; 95: 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.02.004
34.
KimDKHanWKimKW, et al.Enhanced interfacial properties of carbon fiber/maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene composites via two-step surface treatment: electrochemical oxidation and silane treatment. Polymers-basel2023; 15(18): 3784. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15183784
35.
MaCPZhangYZhangH, et al.Effects of acid–base properties of ammonium salt electrolyte on electrochemical surface activation of carbon fibers. Fibers Polym2023; 24(10): 3501–3511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00322-5
36.
LiuJTianYChenY, et al.Interfacial and mechanical properties of carbon fibers modified by electrochemical oxidation in (NH4HCO3)/(NH4)2C2O4·H2O aqueous compound solution. Appl Surf Sci2010; 256(21): 6199–6204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.141
ZhangYYZhangYZLiuY, et al.A novel surface modification of carbon fiber for high-performance thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Appl Surf Sci2016; 382: 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.118
39.
LiWWKangHLXuJ, et al.Effects of ultra-high temperature treatment on the microstructure of carbon fibers. Chin J Polym Sci2017; 35(6): 764–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-017-1922-9
40.
LeeSHLeeSMRohJS. Microstructure of milled polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber analyzed by micro-Raman spectroscopy and TEM. Materials2021; 14(16): 4711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164711
41.
LeeSHKangDSLeeSM, et al. X-ray diffraction analysis of the effect of ball milling time on crystallinity of milled polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fiber. Carbon Lett. 2018; 26(1): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.26.011
42.
KangDSLeeSMLeeSH, et al. X-ray diffraction analysis of the crystallinity of phenolic res in-derived carbon as a function of the heating rate during the carbonization process. Carbon Lett. 2018; 27: 108–111. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2018.27.108
Mendez-LinanJIOrtiz-OrtegaEJimenez-MorenoMF, et al.Aging effect of plasma-treated carbon surfaces: an overlooked phenomenon. Carbon2020; 169: 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.085
45.
BaeGParkTSongIH. Surface modification of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) by ultraviolet (UV) irradiation and IPA rinsing. Micromachines-Basel2022; 13(11): 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13111952
46.
ShinYQiaoYCanfieldN, et al. Significant slowdown of plasma-optimized surface energy deactivation by vacuum sealing for efficient adhesive bonding. Compos Part B Eng. 2022; 240: 110001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
