Compared with single fiber composites, hybrid fiber reinforced plastics (HFRPs) have better designability, specific strength, specific stiffness, toughness, and corrosion resistance. Due to the above advantages, HFRPs are increasingly widely used in aviation, aerospace, rail transit, national defense and military industries, wind power generation, and other fields. The hybrid effect is the reason for the better properties of HFRPs, so it is of great significance to study the hybrid effect. In this paper, the research on hybrid effect is reviewed. First, the theory of hybrid effect is expounded, and the shortcomings of current theoretical research are pointed out. The failure mode and failure mechanism of HFRPs are analyzed, and the existing problems in this research are discussed and summarized. Then the influence factors of the hybrid effect under tension are analyzed, and the hybrid effect under pressure is also analyzed and discussed. Finally, the research on hybrid effect is summarized, and the direction, key points, and difficulties of future research are put forward to guide the development and application of hybrid effect research.
SudhinAUManuRAjeeshG, et al.Comparison of properties of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting composites for aerospace applications. In: International conference on advances in materials and manufacturing applications (IConAMMA). Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, School Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, pp. 453–462.
2.
MouritzAPGellertEBurchillP, et al.Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines. Compos Struct2001; 53(1): 21–42.
3.
Van Den EindeLZhaoLSeibleF. Use of FRP composites in civil structural applications. Constr Build Mater2003; 17(6-7): 389–403.
4.
ShenghuCZhisWUXinW. Tensile properties of CFRP and hybrid FRP composites at elevated temperatures. J Compos Mater2009; 43(4): 315–330.
5.
TranPWuCSalehM, et al.Composite structures subjected to underwater explosive loadings: a comprehensive review. Compos Struct2021; 263: 113684.
6.
BannisterM. Challenges for composites into the next millennium — a reinforcement perspective. Composites Part A2002; 32(7): 901–910.
7.
ZhouNFanWTangK, et al.Advances in application of fiber reinforced composite materials to light weight protective field journal of Liaoning University of Technology. Nat Sci Ed2017; 37(4): 244–249.
8.
HeBWangBWangZ, et al.Mechanical properties of hybrid composites reinforced by carbon fiber and high-strength and high-modulus polyimide fiber. Polymer2020; 204: 122830.
9.
MaFYangMPuY, et al.Effect of hybrid ratio on the flexural properties of carbon and basalt hybrid fibers reinforced epoxy resin composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin2019; 36(2): 362–369.
10.
LiuJQiuRCaoQ. Study on mechanical properties and failure mechanism of carbon/glass hybrid fiber composites. N Chem Mater2022; 50(11): 153–157.
11.
WangJWangTXiaoF. Progress in carbon/kevlar fiber hybrid composite. N Chem Mater2013; 41(2): 1–6.
12.
ChenQHeYZhangL, et al.Mechanical property of carbon/glass hybrid fiber composite. N Chem Mater2020; 48(7): 134–138.
13.
FukudaIH. An advanced theory of the strength of hybrid composites. J Mater Sci1983; 19: 974–982.
14.
De GreefNGorbatikhLGodaraA, et al.The effect of carbon nanotubes on the damage development in carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon2011; 49(14): 4650–4664.
15.
De GreefNGorbatikhLLomovSV, et al.Damage development in woven carbon fiber/epoxy composites modified with carbon nanotubes under tension in the bias direction. Composites Part A2011; 42(11): 1635–1644.
CzélGWisnomMR. Demonstration of pseudo-ductility in high performance glass/epoxy composites by hybridisation with thin-ply carbon prepreg. Composites Part A2013; 52: 23–30.
18.
MaFYangMPuY, et al.Effect of hybrid ration the flexural properties of carbon and basalt hybrid fibers reinforced epoxy resin composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin2019; 36(2): 362–369.
19.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL. Maximising the hybrid effect in unidirectional hybrid composites. Mater Des2016; 93: 39–45.
20.
SinghSBChawlaHRanjithaB. Hybrid effect of functionally graded hybrid composites of glass-carbon fibers. Mech Adv Mater Struct2018; 26(14): 1195–1208.
21.
SinghJKumarMKumarS, et al.Properties of glass fiber hybrid composites: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng2017; 56(5): 455–469.
22.
RibeiroFSena-CruzJBrancoFG, et al.Analytical hybrid effect prediction and evolution of the tensile response of unidirectional hybrid fibre-reinforced polymers composites for civil engineering applications. J Compos Mater2020; 54(22): 3205–3228.
23.
HasanKMFHorváthPGAlpárT. Potential fabric-reinforced composites: a comprehensive review. J Mater Sci2021; 56(26): 14381–14415.
24.
GuptaMKSrivastavaRK. Mechanical properties of hybrid fibers-reinforced polymer composite: a review. Polym Plast Technol Eng2015; 55(6): 626–642.
25.
GuptaMKRameshMThomasS. Effect of hybridization on properties of natural and synthetic fiber‐reinforced polymer composites (2001–2020): a review. Polym Compos2021; 42(10): 4981–5010.
26.
DharmavarapuPSreekara ReddyMBS. Aramid fibre as potential reinforcement for polymer matrix composites: a review. Emergent Mater2021; 5(5): 1561–1578.
HimaniJPurnimaJ. Development of glass fiber, wollastonite reinforced polypropylene hybrid composite: mechanical properties and morphology. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527(7-8): 1946–1951.
29.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites. J Mater Sci1981; 16(8): 2246–2256.
30.
FriedrichKJacobsO. On wear synergism in hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 43(1): 71–84.
31.
ZhangYLiYMaH, et al.Tensile and interfacial properties of unidirectional flax/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 88: 172–177.
32.
ArthanarieswaranVPKumaravelAKathirselvamM. Evaluation of mechanical properties of banana and sisal fiber reinforced epoxy composites: influence of glass fiber hybridization. Mater Des2014; 64: 194–202.
33.
TianHZhangYX. The influence of bagasse fibre and fly ash on the long-term properties of green cementitious composites. Constr Build Mater2016; 111: 237–250.
WangALiuXYueQ, et al.Tensile properties hybrid effect of unidirectional flax/carbon fiber hybrid reinforced polymer composites. J Mater Res Technol2023; 24: 1373–1389.
36.
YanLChouwNJayaramanK. Flax fibre and its composites-a review. Composites Part B2014; 56: 296–317.
37.
KumarABiswalMMohantyS, et al.Recent developments of lignocellulosic natural fiber reinforced hybrid thermosetting composites for high-end structural applications: a review. J Polym Res2021; 28(12): 459.
38.
AbdollahiparsaHShahmirzalooATeuffelP, et al.A review of recent developments in structural applications of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Composites (NFRCs). Compos Adv Mater2023; 32: 18.
39.
IsmailSOAkpanEDhakalHN. Review on natural plant fibres and their hybrid composites for structural applications: recent trends and future perspectives, composites. Part C: Open Access2022; 9: 1–33.
40.
KopparthySDSNetravaliAN. Review: green composites for structural applications, composites, part C. Open Access2021; 6: 1–17.
41.
AthijayamaniAThiruchitrambalamMNatarajanU, et al.Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical properties of randomly oriented natural fibers/polyester hybrid composite. Mater Sci Eng A2009; 517(1-2): 344–353.
42.
KhanASapuanSMZainudinES, et al.Hybridization and its transformative role in bamboo fiber reinforced polymer composites: a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater2024; 7(5): 164.
43.
JustoJOsunaSParísF. Design of composite materials with improved impact properties. Composites Part B2015; 76: 229–234.
44.
BagheriZSEl SawiIBougheraraH, et al.Biomechanical fatigue analysis of an advanced new carbon fiber/flax/epoxy plate for bone fracture repair using conventional fatigue tests and thermography. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014; 35: 27–38.
45.
GuermaziNBen TarjemAKsouriI, et al.On the durability of FRP composites for aircraft structures in hygrothermal conditioning. Composites Part B2016; 85: 294–304.
46.
HayashiT. On the improvement of mechanical properties of composites by hybrid composition. Proc 8th Int Reinforced Plastics Conference1972; 149–152.
47.
MaTJiaZGuanX, et al.Effects of hybrid ratio on the axial compressed and flexural properties of unidirectional inter-layer carbon-glass hybrid composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin2017; 34(4): 530–537.
48.
SwolfsYGorbatikhLVerpoestI. Fibre hybridisation in polymer composites: a review. Composites Part A2014; 67: 181–200.
49.
WeiJTaoHGuoW. Study on the properties of carbon-glass hybrid fiber acoustic composite material. Dev Appl Mater2018; 33(6): 81–86.
50.
XuPSongH. The hybrid effect of hybrid fibers composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin1988; 5(5): 66–74.
51.
DengZLiJ. Research and development of hybrid effect of hybrid FRP composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites Materials2008; 1: 9–13.
52.
ZhangPZhuHMengS, et al.Therotical analysis and test reseach on hybrid effect of CFRP/BFRP hybrid fiber. Ind Constr2011; 41(3): 103–112.
53.
ZhangDZhangZ. Experiment and analysis of hybrid effects of CF/GF/CF/KF. New Chemical Materials1997; 12(3): 46–51.
54.
JiangHLiuXJiangS, et al.Hybrid effects and interactive failure mechanisms of hybrid fiber composites under flexural loading: carbon/kevlar, carbon/glass, carbon/glass/kevlar. Aero Sci Technol2023; 133: 108105–108119.
55.
PanNChenKMonegoCJ, et al.The hybrid effects in hybrid fibre composites: experimental study using twisted fibrous structures. Proc R Soc Lond A1998; 454: 1109–1127.
56.
WisnomMRCzélGSwolfsY, et al.Hybrid effects in thin ply carbon/glass unidirectional laminates: accurate experimental determination and prediction. Composites Part A2016; 88: 131–139.
57.
KaramoozMRRahmaniHKhosraviH. Hybrid effects of basalt and kevlar fibers on low-velocity impact behavior of epoxy-based composites. Fibers Polym2020; 21(11): 2590–2598.
58.
YanWZengJWangB. The progress in fibers hybrid composites. N Chem Mater2011; 39(6): 30–33.
59.
ZengQZhangYYFanFQ. A random critical-core theory of micro damage in interply hybrid composites: I—first failure and hybrid effect. Compos Sci Technol1993; 49: 341–348.
60.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites. J Mater Sci1981; 16(16): 2246–2256.
ZhouJ. Study on mechanical properties of hybrid carbon fiber reinforced composites (HCFRP). Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2022.
63.
KretsisG. A review of the tensile, compressive, flexural and shear properties of hybrid fibre-reinforced plastics. Composites2004; 18(1): 13–23.
64.
DengZLiJ. Reseatch and development of hybrid effect of hybrid FRP composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2008; 1: 9–12.
65.
XuBSongH. The hybrid effect of hybrid fibrous compostes. Acta Mater Compos Sin1988; 5(1): 67–74.
66.
YaoL. Analysis on hybrid effect of composites materials under longitudinal compression. J Wuhan Univ Hydr Elec Eng1989; 22(2): 44–52.
67.
WeiCZengH. Research progress on hybrid effects of hybrid fiber reinforced composites. Engineering Plastics Application1987; 3: 25–32.
68.
FischerSMaromGTulerFR. Hybrid effects in composites: a comparison between inter-laminar and translaminar configurations. J Mater Sci1979; 14: 863–868.
69.
WuZYNiRF. Experimentally study on mechanical behavior of CF and GF hybrid fiber-reinforced plastics. Adv Mater Res2011; 332-334: 1082–1086.
70.
MiwaMHoribaN. Effects of fibre length on tensile strength of carbon/glass fibre hybrid composites. Mater Sci1994; 29: 973–977.
71.
MaromGFischerSTulerFR, et al.Hybrid effects in composites: conditions for positive or negative effects versus rule-of-mixtures behaviour. J Mater Sci1978; 13: 1419–1426.
72.
DongCRanaweera-JayawardenaHADaviesIJ. Flexural properties of hybrid composites reinforced by S-2 glass and T700S carbon fibres. Composites Part B2012; 43(2): 573–581.
73.
DongCDaviesIJ. Optimal design for the flexural behaviour of glass and carbon fibre reinforced polymer hybrid composites. Mater Des2012; 37: 450–457.
74.
PiggottMRHarrisB. Compression strength of hybrid fibre-reinforced plastics. J Mater Sci1981; 16(16): 687–693.
75.
KalantariMDongCDaviesIJ. Numerical investigation of the hybridisation mechanism in fibre reinforced hybrid composites subjected to flexural load. Composites Part B2016; 102: 100–111.
76.
SunZWuYZhongW, et al.Study on the thermal expansion performance and hybrid effect of hybrid composites. N Chem Mater2002; 17(1): 49–52.
77.
PiggotMRHarrisB. Compression strength of hybrid fibre-reinforced. J Mater Sci1981; 16: 687–693.
78.
GhoshPBoseNRMitraBC, et al.Dynamic mechanical analysis of FRP composites based on different fiber reinforcements and epoxy resin as the matrix material. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 64(12): 2467–2472.
79.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites-part 1 failure strain enhancement and failure mode. J Mater Sci1981; 16(16): 2233–2245.
80.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites-Part 2 A statistical model. J Mater Sci1981; 16: 2246–2256.
81.
MandersPWBaderMGChouTW. Monte Carlo simulation of the strength of composite fibre bundles. Fibre Sci Technol1982; 17(3): 183–204.
82.
RosenBW. Tensile failure of fibrous composites. AIAA J1964; 2(11): 1985–1991.
83.
ZwebenC. Tensile strength of hybrid composites. J Mater Sci1977; 12(7): 1325–1337.
84.
FukudaH. An advanced theory of the strength of hybrid composites. J Mater Sci2004; 19(3): 974–982.
85.
FukudaHChouTW. A probabilistic theory of the strength of short-fibre composites with variable fibre length and orientation. J Mater Sci1982; 17(4): 1003–1011.
86.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites. Part 2 A statistical model. J Mater Sci1981; 16(8): 2246–2256.
87.
AvestonJSillwoodJM. Synergistic fibre strengthening in hybrid composites. J Mater Sci1976; 11(12): 1877–1883.
88.
SongHZhangZ. Hybrid composite. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, 1989.
89.
MallickPBroutmanL. Static and impact properties of laminated hybrid composites. J Test Eval1977; 5(3): 190–200.
90.
FanFZengQHuangX. Probabilistic fracture theories for composites. Mechanics and Practice1999; 22(2): 1–5.
91.
FanFZengQ. Random expanded critical kernel theory for unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. Science in China (Series A)1994; 24(2): 209–217.
ZengQDFanFZhangY. A random critical-core theory of micro-damage in interply hybrid composites: I—First failure and hybrid effect. Compos Sci Technol1993; 49(4): 341–348.
94.
ZengQ. A random critical-core theory of microdamage in interply hybrid composites: II—Ultimate failure. Compos Sci Technol1994; 52(4): 481–487.
95.
RabczukTBelytschkoT. Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng2004; 61(13): 2316–2343.
96.
DengMYangWDingY, et al.Boosting GFRTP fatigue life prediction with data augmentation and machine learning. Composites Part B2025; 307: 112892.
97.
XiongWLongXBordasSPA, et al.The deep finite element method: a deep learning framework integrating the physics-informed neural networks with the finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2025; 436: 117681.
98.
SongHZhangZ. Hybrid composite materials. Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, 1989.
99.
MandersPWBaderMG. The strength of hybrid glass/carbon fibre composites. Part1 failure strain enhancement and failure mode. J Mater Sci1981; 16(8): 2233–2245.
100.
JalalvandMCzélGWisnomMR. Numerical modelling of the damage modes in UD thin carbon/glass hybrid laminates. Compos Sci Technol2014; 94: 39–47.
101.
MaTLiW. Study of the tensile failure modes of undirectional carbon fiber/glass fiber ply-inner ply hybrid composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2015; 12: 87–93.
102.
DengZLiJ. Study on uniaxial tensile properties of hybrid FRP composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites Materials2008; (3): 30–34.
103.
FuSYMaiYWLaukeB, et al.Synergistic effect on the fracture toughness of hybrid short glass fiber and short carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Sci Eng2002; 323: 326–335.
104.
BerbinauPSoutisCGuzIA. Compressive failure of 0 unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced plastic CFRP laminates by fibre microbuckling. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 1451–1455.
105.
SoutisC. Compression testing of pultruded carbon fibre-epoxy cylindrical rods. J Mater Sci Mater Electron2000; 35: 3441–3446.
106.
ZhangZZhangXLiangZ. Compressive and flexural behavior of multi-directional hybrid laminates. J Mater Eng1995; 11: 22–25.
107.
RosenBW. Fiber composite materials. Am Soc Metals1965; 37.
YaoL. Shear faiure of the matrix in hybrid composites under compression. J Wuhan Univ of Hydr and Elec Eng1991; 24(2): 165–174.
113.
LiLYuanZWangY, et al.A comparative research on test methods for the compressive properties of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced composites. Aero Mater & Tech2022; 2: 134–140.
114.
WeiYYangWHuangK. Defect sensitivity of compressive failure modes in fibers reinforced composites. Eng Mech1992; 9(1): 11–18.
115.
LagoudasDCSalehAM. Compressive failure due to kinking of fibrous composites. J Compos Mater1993; 27(1): 83–106.
116.
NaikNKKumarRS. Compressive strength of unidirectional composites: evaluation and comparison of prediction models. Compos Struct1999; 46(3): 299–308.
117.
LieuYKShihWKJangBZ. Controlled energy dissipation in fibrous composites II: microscopic failure mechanisms. Polym Compos1991; 12(1): 57–65.
118.
DongCDaviesIJ. Flexural properties of glass and carbon fiber reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. J Mater: Design and Applications2012; 227(4): 308–317.
119.
DongCDuongJDaviesIJ. Flexural properties of S-2 glass and TR30S carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Polym Compos2012; 33(5): 773–781.
120.
LiangQLiuJWangX, et al.Flexural progressive failure mechanism of hybrid 3D woven composites: combination of X-ray tomography, acoustic emission and digital image correlation. Compos Struct2022; 280: 114894–114906.
121.
ZhouJLiPWangY. Mechanical properties of unidirectional hybrid carbon fiber reinforced composites under three-point bending load. Compos Sci and Eng2023; 3: 112–119.
122.
RenPZhangZXieL, et al.Hybrid effect on mechanical properties of M40-T300 carbon fiber reinforced Bisphenol A Dicyanate ester composites. Polym Compos2010; 31(12): 2129–2137.
123.
PitkethlyMJBaderMG. Failure modes of hybrid composites consisting of carbon fibre bundles dispersed in a glass fibre epoxy resin matrix. J Phys D Appl Phys1987; 20(3): 315–322.
124.
LiangYSunCAnsariF. Acoustic emission characterization of damage in hybrid fiber-reinforced polymer rods. J Compos Construct2004; 8(1): 70–78.
125.
BakisCENanniATeroskyJA, et al.Self-monitoring, pseudo-ductile, hybrid FRP reinforcement rods for concrete applications. Compos Sci Technol2002; 61(6): 815–823.
126.
PeijsAAJMKokJMMD. Hybrid composites based on polyethylene and carbon fibres. Part 6: tensile and fatigue behaviour. Composites2003; 24(1): 19–32.
KretsisG. A review of the tensile, compressive, flexural and shear properties of hybrid fibre-reinforced plastics. Composites1984; 18(1): 13–23.
129.
ZhangLZhaoQHuangY, et al.Influencing factors on the longitudinal compression properties of pultruded unidirectional fiber composites. Sci Adv Mater2022; 14: 319–332.
130.
NewcombBA. Processing, structure, and properties of carbon fibers. Composites Part A2016; 91: 262–282.
131.
MaFSunHMaW, et al.Research summary on modified basalt fiber reinforced composites. Automobile Technology2022; 10: 1–15.
132.
BohlannRRenieriMRenieriG. Advanced materials and design for integrated topside structures. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2002.
133.
MetcalfAGSchmitzKG. Effect of length on the strength of glass fibers. Proc ASTM1964; 64(8): 1075–1093.
134.
MetcalfAGSchmitzKG. Effect of length on the strength of glass fibers. Proc ASTM1964; 64(8): 1075.
135.
Alcudia-ZacaríasEAbúndez-PliegoAMayénJ, et al.Experimental assessment of residual integrity and balanced mechanical properties of GFRP/CFRP hybrid laminates under tensile and flexural conditions. Appl Compos Mater2020; 27(6): 895–914.
136.
ZafarHMNNairF. Comparison of static/dynamic loading and tensile behavior of interply and intraply hybridized carbon/basalt epoxy composites. Appl Compos Mater2021; 29(2): 451–472.
137.
ÖzbekÖDoğanNFBozkurtÖY. An experimental investigation on lateral crushing response of glass/carbon intraply hybrid filament wound composite pipes. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2020; 42(7): 1–13.
138.
DengYYangYJiangH, et al.On lateral crashworthiness and failure mechanisms of multi-fibers hybrid composite corrugated structures with carbon, glass, kevlar. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 198: 111689.
139.
ZhangC. Study on impact resistance properties and damage mechanism of carbon/glass unidirectional warp knitted hybrid composites. Donghua University, 2021.
140.
TüzemenMÇ. Evaluation of tensile properties on glass/carbon fiber epoxy pure, inter ply, and locally nested intra ply hybrid composites. Polym Compos2022; 43(9): 6464–6475.
141.
LiMZhangPCuiJ, et al.Effect of hybridization on free vibration response of carbon/glass hybrid composite laminates. J Reinforc Plast Compos2023; 43(0): 818–830.
142.
HouZLiuPTianX, et al.Hybrid effect of 3D-printed coaxial continuous hybrid fibre-reinforced composites. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 188: 110820–110830.
143.
DingSZouBZhuangY, et al.Hybrid layout and additive manufacturing of continuous carbon/glass fibers reinforced composites, and its effect on mechanical properties. Compos Struct2023; 319: 117133–117145.
144.
Raci AydinMAcarVCakirF, et al.Comparative dynamic analysis of carbon, aramid and glass fiber reinforced interply and intraply hybrid composites. Compos Struct2022; 291: 115595–115610.
145.
SongJH. Pairing effect and tensile properties of laminated high-performance hybrid composites prepared using carbon/glass and carbon/aramid fibers. Composites Part B2015; 79: 61–66.
146.
NisiniESantulliCLiveraniA. Mechanical and impact characterization of hybrid composite laminates with carbon, basalt and flax fibres. Composites Part B2017; 127: 92–99.
147.
FuSLaukeB. Effects of fiber length and fiber orientation distributions on the tensile strength of short-fiber-reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol2002; 56(10): 1179–1190.
148.
KalantariMDongCDaviesIJ. Effect of matrix voids, fibre misalignment and thickness variation on multi-objective robust optimization of carbon/glass fibre-reinforced hybrid composites under flexural loading. Composites Part B2017; 123: 136–147.
149.
BelgacemLOuinasDViña OlayJA, et al.Experimental investigation of notch effect and ply number on mechanical behavior of interply hybrid laminates (glass/carbon/epoxy). Composites Part B2018; 145: 189–196.
150.
ZhangZZhongWZhangD, et al.Analysis on arrangement of hybrid composites reinforced with different diameter fibers. J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut1999; 25(5): 499–501.
151.
AlsaadiMErkliğAAlrawiH. Effect of S-glass fabric on the mechanical characteristics of a hybrid carbon/aramid fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Mater Res Express2017; 4(5): 055304–055308.
152.
ZhuangH. Manufacture, properties and processing of long fiber reinforced thermoplastics, East China University of Science and technology, 2011.
153.
DaiHLHuangZWMeiC, et al.Prediction of the tensile strength of hybrid polymer composites filled with spherical particles and short fibers. Compos Struct2018; 187: 509–517.
154.
FuSXuGMaiY. On the elastic modulus of hybrid particle/short-fiber/polymer composites. Comp Part B Eng2002; 33(4): 291–299.
155.
WangJZhuC. Study on tensile properties of glass-polyester hybrid 3D woven composite plates. J Mater Eng Perform2007: 179–183.
156.
WuZWangXIwashitaK, et al.Tensile fatigue behaviour of FRP and hybrid FRP sheets. Composites Part B2010; 41(5): 396–402.
157.
OttoGPMoisésMPCarvalhoG, et al.Mechanical properties of a polyurethane hybrid composite with natural lignocellulosic fibers. Composites Part B2017; 110: 459–465.
158.
KureemunURavandiMTranLQN, et al.Effects of hybridization and hybrid fibre dispersion on the mechanical properties of woven flax-carbon epoxy at low carbon fibre volume fractions. Compos Part B2018; 134: 28–38.
159.
IsaMTAhmedASAderemiBO, et al.Effect of fiber type and combinations on the mechanical, physical and thermal stability properties of polyester hybrid composites. Composites Part B2013; 52: 217–223.
160.
VigneshPVenkatachalamGGautham ShankarA, et al.Studies on tensile strength of sugarcane fiber reinforced hybrid polymer matrix composite. Mater Today Proc2018; 5(5): 13347–13357.
161.
CavalcantiDKKBaneaMDNetoJSS, et al.Mechanical characterization of intra-laminar natural fibre-reinforced hybrid composites. Compos Part B Eng2019; 175: 107149.
162.
BouaouneLBrunetYEl MoumenA, et al.Random versus periodic microstructures for elasticity of fibers reinforced composites. Composites Part B2016; 103: 68–73.
163.
XieJNingZ. Microscale and mesoscale modeling for compressive failure in unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with random distribution of fiber misalignments. Polym Compos2024; 45(6): 5675–5693.
164.
ÇakirMAkinE. Characterization of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermosetting polyimide matrix composites manufactured by using various synthesized PI precursor resins. Composites Part B2022; 231: 109559–109576.
165.
WangSJiangSHanX, et al.Research progress on high-performance polyimide resins and their composites. J Funct Polym2021; 34(6): 570–585.
166.
NashNHPortelaABachour-SirerolCI, et al.Effect of environmental conditioning on the properties of thermosetting and thermoplastic-matrix composite materials by resin infusion for marine applications. Compos Part B2019; 177: 107271.
167.
ShahSZHMegat-YusoffPSMKaruppananS, et al.Performance comparison of resin-infused thermoplastic and thermoset 3D fabric composites under impact loading. Int J Mech Sci2020; 189: 105984.
168.
YanCLvGZhuY, et al.Progress of the world’s plastics industry from 2021 to 2022 (Ⅲ): Thermoset Retins. China Plast Ind2023; 51(5): 1–24.
169.
MunawarNSZIshakMRJawaidM, et al.An investigation of the morphological and tensile properties of vacuum resin impregnated sugar palm fibers with various thermosetting resins. Bio Resources2023; 14(3): 5212–5223.
170.
LiangLYuMWangP. Preparation of high temperature resistant epoxy composites reinforced by carbon fiber. J Shanghai Univ, Nat Sci Ed2021; 27(5): 928–939.
171.
LuHLiYZhangD, et al. Progress on the research of toughening modified epoxy resin and their application in aerospace advanced composites. Compos Sci Technol2023; 8: 121–128.
172.
LouG. Study on toughening and flame retardant of solid epoxy resin composites. Zhejiang A&F University, 2022.
173.
ZhangDChenJBaoJ, et al.Effects of thermoplastic resin content on longitudinal compressive performance of carbon fiber reinforced expoxy composites. Compos Sci Eng2021; 5: 31–36.
174.
SonnenfeldCMendil-JakaniHAgoguéR, et al.Thermoplastic/thermoset multilayer composites: a way to improve the impact damage tolerance of thermosetting resin matrix composites. Compos Struct2017; 171: 298–305.
175.
WilkinsonSPWardTCMcGrathJE. Effect of thermoplastic modifier variables on toughening a bismaleimide matrix resin for high-perform ance composite materials. Polymer1993; 34(4): 870–884.
176.
LiuJZhangLShunW, et al.Recent development on bio‐based thermosetting resins. J Polym Sci2021; 59(14): 1474–1490.
177.
MaSLiTLiuX, et al.Research progress on bio-based thermosetting resins. Polym Int2016; 65(2): 164–173.
178.
LiuJWangSPengY, et al.Advances in sustainable thermosetting resins: from renewable feedstock to high performance and recyclability. Prog Polym Sci2021; 113: 101353–101401.
179.
RondaJCLligadasGGaliàM, et al.A renewable approach to thermosetting resins. React Funct Polym2013; 73(2): 381–395.
180.
ZhaoT. Study on interfacial bonding of repairable epoxy resin and its composites. Dalian University of Technology, 2022.
181.
LiWChenJHuangJ, et al.Research progress of degradable thermosetting resin and carbon fiber reinforced composites. Thermosetting Resin2022; 37(5): 60–69.
182.
YeLChenZRLuM, et al.De-consolidation and re-consolidation in CF/PPS thermoplastic matrix composites. Composites Part A2005; 36(7): 915–922.
183.
ObandeWOBrádaighCMRayD. Continuous fibre-reinforced thermoplastic acrylic-matrix composites prepared by liquid resin infusion – a review. Composites Part B2021; 215: 180771.
184.
PiniTCaimmiFBriatico-VangosaF, et al.Fracture initiation and propagation in unidirectional CF composites based on thermoplastic acrylic resins. Eng Fract Mech2017; 184: 51–58.
185.
BoufaidaZFargeLAndréS, et al.Influence of the fiber/matrix strength on the mechanical properties of a glass fiber/thermoplastic-matrix plain weave fabric composite. Composites Part A2015; 75: 28–38.
186.
MaHAravandAFalzonBG. Synergistic enhancement of fracture toughness in multiphase epoxy matrices modified by thermoplastic and carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol2021; 201: 108523.
187.
de Andrade RaponiORighetti de SouzaBMiranda BarbosaLC, et al.Thermal, rheological, and dielectric analyses of the polymerization reaction of a liquid thermoplastic resin for infusion manufacturing of composite materials. Polym Test2018; 71: 32–37.
188.
ZollerAEscaléPGérardP. Pultrusion of bendable continuous fibers reinforced composites with reactive acrylic thermoplastic. Front Mater2019; 6: 1–9.
189.
ShinJHKimDCenteaT, et al.Thermoplastic prepreg with partially polymerized matrix: material and process development for efficient part manufacturing. Composites Part A2019; 119: 154–164.
190.
KazemiMEShanmugamLLuD, et al.Mechanical properties and failure modes of hybrid fiber reinforced polymer composites with a novel liquid thermoplastic resin, Elium®, composites. Part A2019; 125: 1–12.
191.
GebhardtMManolakisIKalinkaG, et al.Re-use potential of carbon fibre fabric recovered from infusible thermoplastic CFRPs in 2nd generation thermosetting-matrix composites. Compos Commun2021; 28: 100974–100979.
192.
WuHTianYChengJ, et al.An experimental study on the tensile properties of CFRP/GFRP hybrid composites. J Guangxi Univ Technol2011; 22(1): 35–38.
193.
ZengJWangTQiuZ. A study on tensile and compressive properties of F-12 aramid fiber and carbon fiber hybrid composites. Aero Mater & Tech2001; 1: 19–23.
194.
JariwalaHJainP. Mathematical analysis to predict tensile strength of banana/glass hybrid polymer composite. Polym Compos2021; 42(9): 4342–4352.
195.
IkbalHWangQAzzamA, et al.Effect of hybrid ratio and laminate geometry on compressive properties of carbon/glass hybrid composites. Fibers Polym2016; 17(1): 117–129.
196.
CyriacGPaulBShunmugeshAKT. The effect of fiber loading on the mechanical behaviour of carbon-aramid hybrid composites. Polym Polym Compos2017; 25(3): 225–228.
197.
BanerjeeSSankarBV. Mechanical properties of hybrid composites using finite element method based micromechanics. Composites Part B2014; 58: 318–327.
198.
ChenR. Volume fraction, mass fraction and void fraction of hybrid fiber composite material. J Solid Rocket Technol2011; 34(2): 238–240.
199.
XuXSDongSLXuXD. Analysis of hybrid effect of two hybrid fiber CGFRP bar and its mechanical properties. Appl Mech Mater2012; 166-169: 680–683.
200.
Tehrani-DehkordiMNosratyHRajabzadehMH. Effects of plies stacking sequence and fiber volume ratio on flexural properties of basalt/nylon-epoxy hybrid composites. Fibers Polym2015; 16(4): 918–925.
201.
QiYJiangYLiJ. Effect of hybrid ratio on mechanical properties of carbon/aramid hybrid fiber multi-layered biaxial weft knitted fabric reinforced composites. J Mater Eng2020; 48(2): 71–78.
202.
Azimpour ShishevanFAkbulutH. Effects of thermal shock cycling on mechanical and thermal properties of Carbon/Basalt fiber-reinforced intraply hybrid composites. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Mech Eng2018; 43(S1): 441–449.
203.
PriyankaPDixitAMaliHS. High-strength hybrid textile composites with carbon, kevlar, and E-Glass fibers for impact-resistant structures. A review. Mech Compos Mater2017; 53(5): 685–704.
204.
BulutMErkliğAYeterE. Hybridization effects on quasi-static penetration resistance in fiber reinforced hybrid composite laminates. Composites Part B2016; 98: 9–22.
205.
HaeryHAZahariRKuntjoroW, et al.Tensile strength of notched woven fabric hybrid glass, carbon/epoxy composite laminates. J Ind Text2012; 43(3): 383–395.
206.
RajpurohitAJoannèsSSingeryV, et al. Hybrid effect in In-Plane loading of carbon/glass fibre based Inter- and intraply hybrid composites. J Compos Sci2020; 4(1): 1–20.
207.
QiYJiangYLiJ, Effect of hybrid ratio on mechanical properties of carbon/aramid hybrid fiber multi-layered biaxial weft knitted fabric reinforced composites. 2020.
208.
ZhangYShiJWangL. Effect of hybrid mode on CF/UHMWPEE composites performance. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2005; 2: 17–19.
209.
ChenWDingYWangX, et al.The hybrid mode of hybrid fiber research. Ind Constr2016; 46: 671–673.
210.
JawaidMAbdul KhalilHPSAbu BakarA. Mechanical performance of oil palm empty fruit bunches/jute fibres reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527(29-30): 7944–7949.
211.
ZhangL. Manufacture technology and axial compression properties of composite cylindrical shell with combined structure. Army Engineering University of PLA, 2022.
212.
ZwebenC. Tensile strength of hybrid composites. J Mater Sci1977; 12(8): 1325–1337.
213.
FukudaHChouTW. Stress concentrations in a hybrid composite sheet. J Appl Mech1983; 50: 845–848.
214.
ZengQHuangXLinX. Study on stress concentrations in an intraply hybrid composite sheet. Appl Math Mech2001; 22(2): 154–159.
215.
ZengQ. A statistical analysis of the tensile failure and hybrid effect of an intraply hybrid composite. Int J Fract1995; 68: 351–362.
216.
ZhouGLiangZZhaoQ. Experiment research on mechanical properties of C/G inter-laminar hybrid composite, aero. Mater Technol2004; 5: 21–25.
217.
WangBWangWLvJ, et al.Mechanical properties of unidirectional carbon-PBO fiber reinforced hybrid composite. J Solid Rocket Technol2019; 42(2): 741–746.
218.
DuNXieQWangX, et al.The mechanical analysis for CF-F12 interply hybrid. In: The 11th National Conference on Composite Materials. IEEE, 2000, pp. 769–773.
219.
ZhangM. Tensile property study of undirectinal kevlar/glass fiber hybrid composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2007; 6: 35–37.
220.
DengZLiJ. Study on uniaxial tensile properties of hybrid FRP composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2008; 3: 30–34.
221.
Abd El-bakyMA. Impact performance of hybrid laminated composites with statistical analysis. Iran Polym J2018; 27(7): 445–459.
222.
WuWWangQLiW. Comparison of tensile and compressive properties of carbon/glass interlayer and intra layer hybrid composites. Materials2018; 11(7): 1–13.
223.
ChenDLuoQMengM, et al.Low velocity impact behavior of interlayer hybrid composite laminates with carbon/glass/basalt fibres. Composites Part B2019; 176: 35.
224.
HeYChenQZhangL, et al.Property of unidirectional continuous fiber reinforced EP composite with concentric hybrid structure. N Chem Mater2020; 48(10): 69–77.
225.
MaTLiW. Study of the tensile failure of unidirectional carbon fiber/glass fiber inner ply-inter ply hybrid composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Compos Mater2015; 12: 87–93.
226.
WuLWangWJiangQ, et al.Illustrating hybrid effect and damage evolution of carbon/aramid braided composite under low-velocity impact. Compos Struct2020; 245: 112372–112382.
CoxHL. The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys1952; 3(3): 72–79.
229.
SchusterDScalaE. The mechanical interaction of sapphire whiskers with a birefringent matrix. Trans Metall Soc AIME1964; 230: 1635–1640.
230.
YangXWuQ. Analysis and application of Raman spectra. National Defence Industry Press, 2008.
231.
ChlupZČernýMStrachotaA, et al.Effect of the exposition temperature on the behaviour of partially pyrolysed hybrid basalt fibre composites. Composites Part B2018; 147: 122–127.
232.
DongYZhangXTianY, et al.Ti3C2Tx-MXene sizing agent surface modified high modulus carbon fiber and its epoxy resin matrix composites interface properties. Acta Mater Compos Sin2022; 39(8): 3712–3722.
233.
WanYZLianJJHuangY, et al.Two-step surface treatment of 3D braided carbon/kevlar hybrid fabric and influence on mechanical performance of its composites. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 429(1-2): 304–311.
234.
NayakSKMohantySSamalSK. Influence of short bamboo/glass fiber on the thermal, dynamic mechanical and rheological properties of polypropylene hybrid composites. Mater Sci Eng A2009; 523(1-2): 32–38.
235.
WangYWuG. Effects of the air oxidation of carbon fibers on the properties of 3-D braided carbon/resin composites. N Carbon Mater2007; 22(1): 88–91.
236.
Ud DinIShaharunMSSubbaraoD, et al.Surface modification of carbon nanofibers by HNO3 treatment. Ceram Int2016; 42(1): 966–970.
237.
ZhouWLongLXiaoP, et al.Silicon carbide nano-fibers in-situ grown on carbon fibers for enhanced microwave absorption properties. Ceram Int2017; 43(7): 5628–5634.
238.
LiNLiXHuangY, et al.Research progress and application of carbon fiber surface modification based on electrophoretic deposition. Polym Bull2021; 2: 29–37.
239.
ZhangCLiuZSunM, et al.Surface treatment on carbon fiber by cold plasma. Materials Reports2018; 32: 294–296.
240.
Baghery BoroojMMousavi ShoushtariANosratian SabetE, et al.Influence of oxygen plasma treatment parameters on the properties of carbon fiber. J Adhes Sci Technol2016; 30(21): 2372–2382.
241.
HuangCChenGWangQ, et al.Research progress of carbon fiber surface modification technology. Engineering Plastics Application2022; 50(1): 170–174.
242.
LiGChenBLiuJ. Research progress of surface modification technology of carbon fiber. N Chem Mater2017; 45(7): 39–41.
243.
HeYChenQWuD, et al.Effect of multiscale reinforcement by fiber surface treatment with polyvinyl alcohol/graphene oxide/oxidized carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of reinforced hybrid fiber composites. Compos Sci Technol2021; 204: 108634–108644.
244.
WenzhouFWeiWQiangqiangM. Interfacial modification and strength characteristics analysis of carbon fiber composites. J Inn Mong Univ Technol2022; 41(4): 379–384.
245.
LiQ. Research on mechanical properties and interface properties of waste recycled carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composites. Plast Technol2022; 50(2): 19–22.
246.
WangJXuSYaoJ, et al.Progress of micromechanical characterization method and fine mechanical model of composite material interface. Polym Mater Sci Eng2023; 39(3): 155–162.
247.
ZhangWQinMChenC, et al. The effect of moisture absorption-drying on the microstructure of the bonding interface of composite materials. Composites Science and Engineering2022; 10: 76–84.
248.
Abu-FarsakhGANumayrKSHamadKA. A micro-mechanical model for predicting the compressive strength of fibrous composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2002; 57(9-10): 1415–1422.
249.
Heidari-RaraniMBashandeh-Khodaei-NaeiniKMirkhalafSM. Micromechanical modeling of the mechanical behavior of unidirectional composites – a comparative study. J Reinforc Plast Compos2018; 37(16): 1051–1071.
250.
ZhangBYuXGuB. An improved shear lag model for predicting stress distribution in hybrid fiber reinforced rubber composites. Fibers Polym2017; 18(2): 349–356.
251.
BarberAHCohenSRKenigS, et al.Interfacial fracture energy measurements for multi-walled carbon nanotubes pulled from a polymer matrix. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64(15): 2283–2289.
252.
StrusMCCanoCIByron PipesR, et al.Interfacial energy between carbon nanotubes and polymers measured from nanoscale peel tests in the atomic force microscope. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69(10): 1580–1586.
253.
YangXBannisterDJYoungRJ. Analysis of the single-fiber pullout test using Raman spectroscopy: part III, pullout of nicalon fibers from a pyrex matrix. J Am Ceram Soc2005; 79(7): 1868–1874.
254.
HsuehCHYoungRJYangX, et al.Stress transfer in a model composite containing a single embedded fiber. Acta Mater2002; 45(4): 1469–1476.
255.
HuangYYoungRJ. Interfacial micromechanics in thermoplastic and thermosetting matrix carbon fibre composites. Composites Part A1996; 27A: 973–980.
256.
LiQLiY. Meso-micro-nanoscale experiments and simulations on the hierarchical interfaces of composites. Sci Sin Phys Mech Astron2022; 53(1): 214604–214615.
257.
LuoWHuangZXueK, et al.Simulation study on interfacial micromechanics of glass fiber reinforced nylon 6 composites. Chin Q Mech2022; 43(4): 762–770.
258.
LiWCaoHWeiB, et al.Effect of CF/BF inter lamminated hybrid structure on composites properties. Thermosetting Resin2009; 24(5): 39–43.
259.
XuH. Study on tensile properties of glass/carbon fiber reinforced plastics hybrid composites. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014.
260.
ZhangJChaisombatKHeS, et al.Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load bearing structures. Mater Des2012; 36: 75–80.
261.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL. A review of input data and modelling assumptions in longitudinal strength models for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Struct2016; 150: 153–172.
262.
ZengSZengZHouB, et al.Tensile properties of unidirectional carbon fiber-glass fiber hybrid reinforced epoxy composites in layer. Acta Mater Compos Sin2016; 33(2): 297–303.
263.
MaTLiW. Study of the tensile failure mode of unidirectional carbon fiber/glass fiber inner ply-inter ply hybrid composites. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites2015; 12: 87–93.
264.
HuangBShangHPengY. Study on the hybrid effect of fibers and the load-carrying capacity of concrete component wrapped with HFRP. Hi-Tech Fiber & Appl2005; 30(6): 39–41.
265.
DaiMZhouGChenG. Study on conventional and fatigue property of the unidirectional hybrid fiber composite. In: Proceedings of the 11th national fiberglass/composite academic annual conference of the fiberglass society. IEEE, 1995, pp. 144–148.
266.
StephenCShivamurthyBMouradAHI, et al.High-velocity impact behavior of hybrid fiber-reinforced epoxy composites. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2021; 43(9): 431–446.
267.
JiangKChenLZhaoQ, et al.Experiment on hybrid fiber reinforced plastic beam. J PLA Univ Sci Technol2008; 9(1): 72–76.
268.
DongCDaviesIJ. Flexural strength of bidirectional hybrid epoxy composites reinforced by E glass and T700S carbon fibres. Composites Part B2015; 72: 65–71.
269.
XuHLiCGuX. Tensile and compression properties of multi-directional carbon/glass fiber hybrid composite. Engineering Plastics Application2014; 42(12): 75–79.
270.
ZhangDZhangZ. Study on tensile properties of CF/GF multidirectional hybrid fiber composites. N Chem Mater1997; 12(2): 29–35.
271.
QianYZhangDZhouG, et al.Investigation of mechanical properties for three-dimensional orthogonal woven glass-carbon hybrid composites. J Nanjing Univ Sci Technol2012; 36(1): 158–164.
272.
MishnaevskyLDaiG. Hybrid carbon/glass fiber composites: micromechanical analysis of structure–damage resistance relationships. Comput Mater Sci2014; 81: 630–640.
273.
SelmyAIElsesiARAzabNA, et al.In-plane shear properties of unidirectional glass fiber (U)/random glass fiber (R)/epoxy hybrid and non-hybrid composites. Composites Part B2012; 43(2): 431–438.
274.
SelmyAIElsesiARAzabNA, et al.Interlaminar shear behavior of unidirectional glass fiber (U)/random glass fiber (R)/epoxy hybrid and non-hybrid composite laminates. Composites Part B2012; 43(4): 1714–1719.
275.
Ary SubagiaIDGKimYTijingLD, et al.Effect of stacking sequence on the flexural properties of hybrid composites reinforced with carbon and basalt fibers. Composites Part B2014; 58: 251–258.
276.
LiY. Stacking sequence effect on the failure process of woven carbon/glass hybrid laminate. J Northwest Polytech Univ1992; 10(2): 236–244.
277.
ZhangLZhaoQHuangY, et al.Influencing factors on the longitudinal compression properties of pultruded unidirectional fiber composites. Sci Adv Mater2022; 14(2): 319–332.
278.
MaTLiW. Study on the repressentation mechod of dispersion degree in the C/G composite laminated board. Fiber reinforced plastics/composites2015; 10: 36–41.
279.
SongHDengHLiangZ. The esimation and experiment of effect of hybrid fibre-reinforced composites. Acta Aeronautica Astronautica Sinica1990; 11(1): A65–A69.
280.
LiCXuHGuX. Prediction on tensile strength of inter ply hybrid composite laminates. Acta Mater Compos Sin2017; 34(4): 567–572.
281.
XuHGuXLiC. Tensile stiffness of hybrid fiber composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin2016; 33(2): 394–398.
282.
GuerreroJMMayugoJACostaJ, et al.A 3D progressive failure model for predicting pseudo-ductility in hybrid unidirectional composite materials under fibre tensile loading. Composites Part A2018; 107: 579–591.
283.
WisnomMR. Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy. Composites2003; 22(1): 47–52.
284.
WisnomMR. Size effects in the testing of fibre-composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2002; 59(13): 1937–1957.
285.
WisnomMRAtkinsonJW. Reduction in tensile and flexural strength of unidirectional glass fibre-epoxy with increasing specimen size. Compos Struct2002; 38(1-4): 405–411.
XuXWisnomMRMahadikY, et al.An experimental investigation into size effects in quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates with sharp and blunt notches. Compos Sci Technol2014; 100: 220–227.
292.
SwolfsYVerpoestIGorbatikhL. Issues in strength models for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites related to weibull distributions, fibre packings and boundary effects. Compos Sci Technol2015; 114: 42–49.
293.
PimentaSPinhoST. Hierarchical scaling law for the strength of composite fibre bundles. J Mech Phys Solid2013; 61(6): 1337–1356.
294.
PimentaS. A computationally-efficient hierarchical scaling law to predict damage accumulation in composite fibre-bundles. Compos Sci Technol2017; 146: 210–225.
295.
OkabeT. Size effect on tensile strength of unidirectional CFRP composites— experiment and simulation. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(15): 2053–2064.
296.
JohnsonDPMortonJKellasS, et al.Scaling effects in sub laminate-level scaled composite laminates. AIAA J1998; 36(3): 441–447.
297.
CamanhoPPMaimíPDávilaCG. Prediction of size effects in notched laminates using continuum damage mechanics. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(13): 2715–2727.
298.
DemiralMKadiogluFSilberschmidtVV. Size effect in flexural behaviour of unidirectional GFRP composites. J Mech Sci Technol2020; 34(12): 5053–5061.
299.
GuerreroJMMayugoJACostaJ, et al.Size effects in hybrid unidirectional polymer composites under longitudinal tension: a micromechanical investigation. Composites Part A2021; 140: 106186.
300.
TalrejaR. Studies on the failure analysis of composite materials with manufacturing defects. Mech Compos Mater2013; 49(1): 35–44.
301.
MehdikhaniMGorbatikhLVerpoestI, et al.Voids in fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review on their formation, characteristics, and effects on mechanical performance. J Compos Mater2018; 53(12): 1579–1669.
302.
EndalewAMWooKCairnsDS. Effect of drilling-induced defects on progressive damage of open-hole composite laminates under compression. Adv Compos Mater2022; 31(4): 399–427.
303.
FereidouniMHoaSV. In-situ consolidation of thermoplastic composites by automated fiber placement: characterization of defects. J Thermoplast Compos Mater2024; 38(2): 471–511.
304.
VasilacheMMTayongRBVelisavljevicV. Comprehensive review on the use of machine learning techniques applied to the ultrasound data for the characterisation of porosity across carbon fibre reinforced polymer layers. Appl Compos Mater2025; 32(4): 1315–1339.
305.
DingHWangJZhangS. Damage tolerance of CFRP with wrinkle defect under different impact energies. Appl Compos Mater2025; 32(6): 2459–2474.
306.
BarryTJKesharajuMNagarajahCR, et al.Defect characterisation in laminar composite structures using ultrasonic techniques and artificial neural networks. J Compos Mater2015; 50(7): 861–871.
