The increasing usage of laminated composite structures in aviation has raised the critical need to understand their behavior under bird-strike events, which pose severe safety risks. This review uniquely focuses on the hybrid Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics–Finite Element Method (SPH-FEM) approach for simulating bird impacts on laminated composite panels. This area has not been comprehensively addressed in prior literature. Unlike traditional modeling methods, the SPH-FEM technique enables accurate simulation of fluid-like bird behavior alongside detailed structural damage mechanisms such as delamination, fiber fracture, and matrix cracking. This work highlights key insights into the influence of bird geometry, impact velocity, and composite layup on damage progression and energy dissipation. Notably, this review identifies critical research gaps in bird homogenization and the validation of high-velocity failure criteria. Recent developments in bio-inspired helicoidal laminates and hybrid models are also examined to inform future design and simulation standards. Through this focused analysis, the review provides a forward-looking framework to advance the reliability, efficiency, and accuracy of bird-strike simulations in aerospace applications.
NazariFSafarabadiM. Experimental and numerical investigation of loading speed effect on the bearing strength of glass/epoxy composite joints. Compos Struct2018; 195: 211–218.
2.
CantwellWJMortonJ. The impact resistance of composite materials - a review. Composites1991; 22: 347–362.
3.
KhodaeiMSafarabadi FarahaniMHaghighi YazdiM. Numerical investigation of the effect of material strain rate dependent properties on high velocity impact behavior and ballistic limit velocity of honeycomb structures. J. Sci. Technol. Compos2019; 5: 511–520.
4.
KhodaeiMSafarabadiMHaghighi-YazdiM, et al.On the ballistic impact behavior of foam-filled honeycomb core/composite skin sandwich panels. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45: 244.
5.
HosseinkhaniMGhavamiHHaghighi-YazdiM, et al.Investigation of viscoelastic properties in composite sandwich panels subjected to low-velocity impact: experimental and numerical approaches. J Sandw Struct Mater2023; 25: 478–498.
SadighiMAlderliestenRCBenedictusR. Impact resistance of fiber-metal laminates: a review. Int J Impact Eng2012; 49: 77–90.
8.
MorinièreFDAlderliestenRCBenedictusR. Modelling of impact damage and dynamics in fibre-metal laminates – a review. Int J Impact Eng2014; 67: 27–38.
9.
YangPYueWLiJ, et al.Review of damage mechanism and protection of aero-engine blades based on impact properties. Eng Fail Anal2022; 140: 106570.
10.
LoprestoVLangellaAPagliaruloV, et al.On low-velocity impact behaviour of composite laminates: damage investigation and influence of matrix and temperature. Prog Aero Sci2022; 129: 100786.
11.
HeiligGAMayM. The hydrodynamic RAM effect: review of historic experiments, model developments and simulation. Def Technol2025; 44: 150–178.
12.
GuidaMMaruloFBelkhelfaFZ, et al.A review of the bird impact process and validation of the SPH impact model for aircraft structures. Prog Aero Sci2022; 129: 100787.
13.
GargASharmaAZhengW, et al.Dactyl club and nacre-inspired impact resistant behavior of layered structures: a review of present trends and prospects. Mater Today Commun2024; 41: 110553.
GuidaMMaruloFPolitoT, et al.Design and testing of a fiber-metal-laminate bird-strike-resistant leading edge. J Aircraft2009; 46: 2121–2129.
16.
MontazeriASafarabadiM. A comparative study on adding chopped kenaf fibers to the core of glass/epoxy laminates under quasi-static indentation: experimental and numerical approaches. J Compos Mater2022; 56: 3821–3833.
17.
Arslan Bin RiazMGüdenM. A review of the experimental and numerical studies on the compression behavior of the additively produced metallic lattice structures at high and low strain rates. Def Technol2025; 49: 1–49.
18.
KaramiSHaghighi‐YazdiMSafarabadiM. Low‐velocity impact behavior of 3D‐printed sandwich panels with integrated composite face sheets. Adv Eng Mater2025; 27: 2401923.
19.
KimD-HKimS-W. Numerical investigation of impact-induced damage of auxiliary composite fuel tanks on Korean Utility Helicopter. Composites Part B2019; 165: 301–311.
20.
JoshiSMaharshiKGoyalN, et al.Multifunctional Carbon-Basalt hybrid composites against bird strike. Mater Today Proc2023; 74: 736–743.
Di CaprioFSellittoASaputoS, et al.A sensitivity analysis of the damage behavior of a leading-edge subject to bird strike. Appl. Sci2020; 10: 8187.
23.
LiuY-QWangX-YTangC-H, et al.Performance comparison of four anti-bird strike aircraft skin material. Hangkong Cailiao Xuebao/Journal Aeronaut. Mater2015; 35: 82–89.
24.
AiroldiACacchioneB. Modelling of impact forces and pressures in Lagrangian bird strike analyses. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 1651–1677.
25.
FragassaCTopalovicMPavlovicA, et al.Dealing with the effect of air in fluid structure interaction by coupled SPH-FEM methods. Materials2019; 12: 1162.
26.
SiengchinS. A review on lightweight materials for defence applications: present and future developments. Def Technol2023; 24: 1–17.
27.
JianyongZXiaoyuZMenglingW. Numerical simulation of a bird impact on a composite aerodynamic brake wing of a high-speed train. Proc Inst Mech Eng - Part F J Rail Rapid Transit2015; 229: 223–236.
28.
AslamMARayhanSBKeZ, et al.Ballistic gelatin Lagrange Mooney-Rivlin material model as a substitute of bird in finite element bird strike case studies. Lat Am J Solid Struct2020; 17: e298.
29.
WonM-S. Bird strike analysis and test of composite aircraft radome. Sci2019; 47: 319–325.
30.
Di CaprioFCristilloDSaputoS, et al.Crashworthiness of wing leading edges under bird impact event. Compos Struct2019; 216: 39–52.
31.
SiddiquiMASRabbiMSRahmanMT. An experimental review on enhancing the low and high-velocity impact resistance of NFCs through nanoparticle reinforcement. J Reinforc Plast Compos2024; 44: 1270–1298.
32.
HedayatiRZiaei-RadS. A new bird model and the effect of bird geometry in impacts from various orientations. Aero Sci Technol2013; 28: 9–20.
33.
GoyalVHuertasCBorreroJ, et al.Robust bird-strike modeling based on ALE formulation using LS-DYNA. In 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adapt. Struct. Conf. 7th. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006.
34.
GuidaMMaruloFMeoM, et al.SPH – Lagrangian study of bird impact on leading edge wing. Compos Struct2011; 93: 1060–1071.
35.
SmojverIIvančevićD. Bird strike damage analysis in aircraft structures using Abaqus/Explicit and coupled Eulerian Lagrangian approach. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 489–498.
36.
MohammadiIHaghighi-YazdiMSafarabadiM, et al.Crashworthiness analysis of a composite guardrail under impact loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl2023; 237: 1651–1664.
37.
MontazeriARahmaniASafarabadiM. Performance and damage mechanism assessment of sandwich composites with glass/kenaf/epoxy skins and a novel core using quasi-static penetration. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45: 256.
38.
DolatiSRezaeepazhandJShariatiM. Numerical simulation of hail impact response of hybrid corrugated core sandwich panels. J Reinforc Plast Compos2019; 38: 643–657.
39.
NishikawaMHemmiKParkS, et al.Finite element analysis on the impact-induced damage of composite fan blades subjected to a bird strike. Space Sci2011; 54: 238–245.
40.
XingLZhangYWangF, et al.Comprehensive effects of aerodynamic performance and dynamic strength of aircraft wings after bird strike in numerical simulation. Mech Adv Mater Struct2024; 31: 8564–8582.
41.
DarUAAwaisMMianHH, et al.The effect of representative bird model and its impact direction on crashworthiness of aircraft windshield and canopy structure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G J. Aerosp. Eng2019; 233: 5150–5163.
42.
AslamMARayhanSBZhangK. Dynamic response of structurally reinforced wing leading edge against soft impact. Aerospace2022; 9: 260.
43.
PavlovićAMinakG. FEM-SPH numerical simulation of impact loading on floating laminates. J Mar Sci Eng2023; 11: 1590.
44.
McCarthyMAXiaoJRPetrinicN, et al.Modelling of bird strike on an aircraft wing leading edge made from fibre metal laminates – Part 1: material modelling. Appl Compos Mater2004; 11: 295–315.
45.
McCarthyMAXiaoJRMcCarthyCT, et al.Modelling of bird strike on an aircraft wing leading edge made from fibre metal laminates – Part 2: modelling of impact with SPH bird model. Appl Compos Mater2004; 11: 317–340.
46.
ĆwiklakJKobiałkaEGośA. Experimental and numerical investigations of bird models for bird strike analysis. Energies2022; 15: 3699.
47.
ZhouYSunYCaiW. Bird-striking damage of rotating laminates using SPH-CDM method. Aero Sci Technol2019; 84: 265–272.
48.
McCarthyMAXiaoJRPetrinicN, et al.Modelling bird impacts on an aircraft wing – Part 1: material modelling of the fibre metal laminate leading edge material with continuum damage mechanics. Int J Crashworthiness2005; 10: 41–49.
49.
McCarthyMAXiaoJRMcCarthyCT, et al.Modelling bird impacts on an aircraft wing – Part 2: modelling the impact with an SPH bird model. Int J Crashworthiness2005; 10: 51–59.
50.
ZhangYZhouY. Evaluating constitutive models of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for bird-strike simulation. Int J Crashworthiness2024; 29: 547–556.
51.
NishikawaMHemmiKTakedaN. Finite-element simulation for modeling composite plates subjected to soft-body, high-velocity impact for application to bird-strike problem of composite fan blades. Compos Struct2011; 93: 1416–1423.
52.
KermanidisTLabeasGSunaricM, et al.Bird strike simulation on a novel composite leading edge design. Int J Crashworthiness2006; 11: 189–202.
53.
ChenLLinXBaiR, et al.Anti-bird-strike behavior of M40J carbon fiber reinforced plastic laminates. Compos Struct2024; 339: 118094.
54.
WanXPWangWZZhaoMY. Bird impact analysis of wing leading edge structure based on SPH method. Key Eng Mater2011; 462–463: 524–529.
55.
HasanMZ. Interface failure of heated GLARETM fiber–metal laminates under bird strike. Aerospace2020; 7: 28.
56.
MoritaHTsangPHW. Soft body impact damage on CF/PEEK laminates using gelatin projectile. J Reinforc Plast Compos1997; 16: 1330–1341.
57.
XueBPengY-XRenS-F, et al.Investigation of impact resistance performance of pyramid lattice sandwich structure based on SPH-FEM. Compos Struct2021; 261: 113561.
58.
LiDJiangXGuoL, et al.An experimental study of the dynamic responses of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite laminates subjected to ice impact. J Reinforc Plast Compos2022; 41: 837–850.
59.
ShaoJXieHLiuN, et al.An improved composite impact damage model and bird-striking damage analysis with smoothed particle hydrodynamics-finite element method. J Reinforc Plast Compos2023; 43: 939–958.
60.
SalehiHZiaei-RadSVaziri-ZanjaniMA. Bird impact effects on different types of aircraft bubble windows using numerical and experimental methods. Int J Crashworthiness2010; 15: 93–106.
61.
LucyLB. A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. Astron J1977; 82: 1013.
62.
GingoldRAMonaghanJJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not Roy Astron Soc1977; 181: 375–389.
63.
MonaghanJJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annu Rev Astron Astrophys1992; 30: 543–574.
GoyalVHuertasCLeutwilerT, et al.Robust bird-strike modeling based on SPH formulation using LS-DYNA. In 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adapt. Struct. Conf. 7th. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006.
70.
KarthickMSanthanakrishnanR. Experimental and numerical investigation on GFRP- aramid honeycomb sandwich panel under bird impact: estimation of penetration velocity. Forces Mech2023; 13: 100240.
71.
MotasoaresCAMartinsJACRodriguesHC, et al. (eds). III European Conference on Computational Mechanics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006.
72.
UzairAWangJXuYJ, et al.High-speed bird impact analysis of aircraft windshield by using a nonlinear viscoelastic model. Appl Mech Mater2013; 290: 85–90.
73.
BoroughsR. High speed bird impact analysis of the Learjet 45 windshield using DYNA3D. In 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. Exhib. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998.
74.
YulongLYongkangZPuX. Study of similarity law for bird impact on structure. Chin J Aeronaut2008; 21: 512–517.
FeraboliPWadeBDeleoF, et al.LS-DYNA MAT54 modeling of the axial crushing of a composite tape sinusoidal specimen. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf2011; 42: 1809–1825.
79.
HeimbsSBergmannT. High-velocity impact behaviour of prestressed composite plates under bird strike loading. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng2012; 2012: 1–11.
80.
StoterSKFDiviSCvan BrummelenEH, et al.Critical time-step size analysis and mass scaling by ghost-penalty for immersogeometric explicit dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2023; 412: 116074.
81.
KeyesDEMcInnesLCWoodwardC, et al.Multiphysics simulations: challenges and opportunities. Int J High Perform Comput Appl2013; 27: 4–83.
82.
ZhouYSunYHuangT. SPH-FEM design of laminated plies under bird-strike impact. Aerospace2019; 6: 112.
83.
ZhengYYanC. A coupled FDEM–SPH model for simulating problems of fluid–solid interaction. Int J Numer Anal Methods GeoMech2025; 49: 3317–3336.
84.
ShirzadehZFakoorMDaneshjooZ. Simulating delamination in composite laminates with fracture process zone effects: a novel cohesive zone modeling approach. Eng Fract Mech2025; 315: 110834.
85.
GappSOtipkaDMaierhoferJ, et al.Efficient 3D finite element modeling of elasto-plastic Hertzian contact of two crossed cylinders with varying contact ellipses after high cycles. Tribol Int2025; 211: 110825.
86.
ZhangWChenXYangJ. A convenient method for simulating crack propagation in panel structures based on the secondary development of ABAQUS. In 2nd Int. Conf. Green Aviat. (ICGA 2024). Basel Switzerland: MDPI, 2025, p. 24.
87.
SrinivasanKJacksonWCSmithBT, et al.Characterization of damage modes in impacted thermoset and thermoplastic composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos1992; 11: 1111–1126.
SharmaATonkAGargA, et al.First-ply failure analysis of bioinspired double and cross-helicoidal laminated sandwich plates. AIAA J2023; 61: 5087–5095.
95.
ZhouYSunYHuangT, et al.SPH-FEM simulation of impacted composite laminates with different layups. Aero Sci Technol2019; 95: 105469.
96.
GargALiL. Influence of speed of soft body projectile on damage in bio-inspired helicoidal laminates using SPH-FEM model. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2024; 1–28.
97.
LiSSitnikovaELiangY, et al.The Tsai-Wu failure criterion rationalised in the context of UD composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf2017; 102: 207–217.
98.
GroenwoldAAHaftkaRT. Optimization with non-homogeneous failure criteria like Tsai–Wu for composite laminates. Struct Multidiscip Optim2006; 32: 183–190.
99.
ChenXSunXChenP, et al.Rationalized improvement of Tsai–Wu failure criterion considering different failure modes of composite materials. Compos Struct2021; 256: 113120.
100.
DinizCACunhaSSGomesGF, et al.Optimization of the layers of composite materials from neural networks with Tsai–Wu failure criterion. J Fail Anal Prev2019; 19: 709–715.
101.
TangXChenY. Bayesian inference for the calibration of cohesive zone models of dovetail specimens from laminated composite fan blade. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2025; 147: 051021.
102.
RafieeRGhorbanhosseiniARezaeeS. Theoretical and numerical analyses of composite cylinders subjected to the low velocity impact. Compos Struct2019; 226: 111230.
103.
RafieeRRashediHRezaeeS. Theoretical study of failure in composite pressure vessels subjected to low-velocity impact and internal pressure. Front Struct Civ Eng2020; 14: 1349–1358.
104.
LuoGXuZShenH, et al.Experimental study on the impact load of internally supported gelatin bird projectiles. Eng Fail Anal2021; 124: 105336.
105.
Abdul KalamSVijaya KumarRRanga JanardhanaG. SPH high velocity impact analysis-influence of bird shape on rigid flat plate. Mater Today Proc2017; 4: 2564–2572.
106.
TanabeYIrisawaT. Fundamental experiments of bird-strike, and derivation of empirical equations for damage. Adv Compos Mater2024; 33: 1083–1100.
107.
MeguidSAMaoRHNgTY. FE analysis of geometry effects of an artificial bird striking an aeroengine fan blade. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 487–498.
108.
DorivalONavarroPMarguetS, et al.3D digital image correlation analysis of medium velocity soft impacts on laminated composite. Forces Mech2023; 13: 100245.
109.
BheemreddyVPChandrasekharaK. Study of bird strikes using smooth particle hydrodynamics and stochastic parametric evaluation. J Aircraft2012; 49: 1513–1520.
110.
GuidaMMaruloFMeoM, et al.Analysis of bird impact on a composite tailplane leading edge. Appl Compos Mater2008; 15: 241–257.
111.
TatlıerMSBaranT. Structural and CFD analysis of an airfoil subjected to bird strike. Eur J Mech B Fluid2020; 84: 478–486.
112.
HedayatiRZiaei-RadS. Effect of bird geometry and orientation on bird-target impact analysis using SPH method. Int J Crashworthiness2012; 17: 445–459.
113.
ZhangDFeiQ. Effect of bird geometry and impact orientation in bird striking on a rotary jet-engine fan analysis using SPH method. Aero Sci Technol2016; 54: 320–329.
114.
McCallumSShojiHAkiyamaH. Development of an advanced multi-material bird-strike model using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method. Int J Crashworthiness2013; 18: 579–597.
115.
LiuJLiY. Numerical simulation of a rotary engine primary compressor impacted by bird. Chin J Aeronaut2013; 26: 926–934.
116.
ZhouYSunYHuangT. Bird-strike resistance of composite laminates with different materials. Materials2019; 13: 129.
117.
ZhouYSunYHuangT. Impact responses of slender composite plates for bird-strike testing of fan blades. Am. J. Solids Struct2019; 16: e232.
118.
ZhouYSunYHuangT. Impact-damage equivalency for twisted composite blades with symmetrical configurations. Symmetry (Basel)2019; 11: 1292.
119.
MayMArnold-KeiferSHaaseT. Damage resistance of composite structures with unsymmetrical stacking sequence subjected to high velocity bird impact. Compos. Part C Open Access2020; 1: 100002.
120.
SunYZhangYZhouY, et al.Evaluating impact damage of flat composite plate for surrogate bird-strike testing of aeroengine fan blade. J Compos Sci2021; 5: 171.
121.
QiuJChenH. Dynamic response of bird strike on variable stiffness laminates of composite leading edge. Int J Crashworthiness2022; 27: 317–327.
122.
ZhangYZhouYLuZ. Evaluation of failure criteria for composite plate under high-velocity impact. J Mech Sci Technol2022; 36: 3291–3300.
123.
RezaeiMArezooBZiaei-RadS. New design of materials, order and thicknesses of an aircraft windshield behaviour layers to increase its resistance against repeated bird impacts. Aeronaut J2024; 128: 2235–2260.
124.
GanesanCKondadiSUdaymohanU, et al. Numerical analysis of bird impact over the aircraft windshield. Int J Veh Struct Syst. 2022; 14.
125.
ZhouRLiangBYueZ, et al.High fidelity simulations of bird impact damages of a 5 MW wind turbine composite blade using SPH and damage models. Thin-Walled Struct2025; 208: 112835.
126.
GargAShuklaNKBelarbiM-O, et al.Bird strike-induced damage studies on bio-inspired laminated plates with holes. Aero Sci Technol2025; 162: 110200.
127.
PovedaRLGuptaN. Post-impact residual high strain rate compressive properties of carbon fiber laminates. J Reinforc Plast Compos2013; 32: 564–573.
128.
IqbalZUmerMAAsimK, et al.Investigating damage resistance in aerospace radome applications: experimental analysis of hybrid sandwich composites. J Reinforc Plast Compos2025; 44: 849–864.
129.
ZhuSWangYTongM, et al.Numerical simulation of bird impact on fibre metal laminates. Polym Polym Compos2014; 22: 147–156.
130.
FuLJiazhenZZhongminH, et al.Numerical analysis of bird impact on a GLARE plate. Polym Polym Compos2013; 21: 587–592.
131.
KonikRKassapoglouCNguyenD. Design analysis and testing of flat sandwich panels under bird strike. J Sandw Struct Mater2023; 25: 144–163.
132.
EsmailiATaheri-BehroozF. Temperature-dependent cohesive zone model for modeling mode I delamination of composite laminates under elevated temperature. Theor Appl Fract Mech2025; 140: 105176.
133.
KarthickMSanthanakrishnanR. Bird impact testing and explicit FE analysis on glass fiber - PMI foam sandwich construction: Prediction of threshold velocity. Journal of Composite Materials. 2025; 59(26): 3031–3052. doi:10.1177/00219983251341632.
134.
DengZFanYTheuerkaufJ, et al.Modeling segregation of polydisperse granular materials in hopper discharge. Powder Technol2020; 374: 389–398.
135.
HasılcıZBoǧoçluMEDalkılıçAS, et al.Development of a prediction model using fully connected neural networks in the analysis of composite structures under bird strike. J Mech Sci Technol2022; 36: 709–722.
136.
ZhaiYLiSZhangX. Vibration performance of composite doubly curved shells embedded with damping layer. Int J Struct Stabil Dynam. 2025; 2650265.
137.
ZhaoYXingSJinQ, et al.Excellent angular and electrical performance damage tolerance of wave-absorbing laminate via gradient A-T-A design. Compos Commun2024; 46: 101838.
