Abstract
The underlying cause of stiffness degradation in composites subjected to fatigue is irreversible microstructural damage, which exhibits spatial anisotropy depending on the loading conditions and structural characteristics. Each mode of microdamage represents different physical quantities, making it a challenging task to predict stiffness. In this work, machine learning (ML) models, including multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF), were employed to predict stiffness based on stereologically quantified damage data. High resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy imaging of edge-sectional planes was conducted during fatigue tests to quantify damage in interrupted composite materials. Experimental findings identified two distinct types of microstructural damage: (i) perpendicular cracks in woven roving mat (WRM) and chopped strand mat (CSM) under tension-tension (T-T) cyclic loading, and (ii) parallel cracks in CSM under both tension-tension and compression-compression cyclic loading. Incorporating these damage features, ML models demonstrated strong predictability of stiffness values for both CSM (T-T) and WRM (T-T) composites, with the SVR model showing particularly good agreement with experimental results for the CSM (T-T) composite. By leveraging experimental microscopy and stereology data, the ML models successfully established a non-linear relationship between microstructural damage and stiffness, providing a robust framework for understanding degradation mechanisms.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
