This study investigates the effects of accelerated weathering (UV radiation and humidity) on the properties of rubber blend and composite rubber blend used for the heel and outer shell of the prosthetic SACH foot. Room Temperature Vulcanized Silicon Rubber (RTV-SIR) was added in various percentages by weight of polyurethane (PUR) (5%, 15%, and 25%), to form a rubber blend. Also, alkali-treated bamboo particles were added in various percentages by weight of rubber blend (3%, 6%, and 9%) to form a composite rubber blend. To minimize the immiscibility between RTV-SIR and PUR, Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) was added as a percentage by weight of the blend structure (0.1%). The vacuum desiccator procedure was used to create the specimens, and then the specimens were subjected to an accelerated weathering device for 100 h. The mechanical characteristics examined were tensile, tear, compression, and hardness. Also, SEM allowed for the observation of microscopic changes in the bamboo particles after alkali treatment and in specimens after weathering. This diversity and different material structures led to other choices for the best structure for the heel and outer shell of a prosthetic SACH foot. The results showed that the best tensile strength, modulus, tear strength, compression strength, and hardness values of 11.39 MPa, 9.2 MPa, 57.64 N/mm, 11.1 MPa, and 84 Shore A, respectively, were found in aging composite rubber blend of 5% RTV-SIR/PUR reinforced with bamboo of weight fraction (9%). The findings demonstrate that specimens of the rubber blend system showed developed properties post-weathering, thus indicating that the rubber blend is more resistant to weathering than its elastomers.
VersluysRDesomerALenaertsG, et al.From conventional prosthetic feet to bionic feet: a review study. In: 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 19–22 October 2008, pp. 49–54.
3.
PhillipsSLCraeliusW. Material properties of selected prosthetic laminates. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot2005; 17(1): 27–32.
4.
BinderK. Theories and mechanism of phase transitions, heterophase polymerizations, homopolymerization, addition polymerization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
5.
Kadhim OleiwiJNamah HadiA. Design of prosthetic foot from polymer materials reinforced by carbon fibers. Engineering and Technology Journal. 2016; 3: 1744–1754. doi:10.30684/etj.34.9A.
6.
ThomasSAjithaAR. Compatibilization of polymer blends: micro and nano scale phase morphologies. In: Interphase characterization, and properties. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780128160060
7.
YueMChianK. Properties and applications of thermoplastic polyurethane blends. Amsterdam: Elsevier eBooks, 1996, pp. 747–761. DOI: 10.1016/b978-088415497-6/50031-0.
8.
PaulRGoudaKBhowmikS. Effect of different constraint on tribological behaviour of natural fibre/filler reinforced polymeric composites: a review. Silicon2021; 13: 2785–2807.
9.
SalihSIOleiwiJKAliHM. Development the physical properties of polymeric blend (SR/ PMMA) by adding various types of nanoparticles, used for maxillofacial prosthesis applications. Engineering and Technology Journal2019; 37: 120–127.
10.
JohnMJAnandjiwalaRD. Recent developments in chemical modification and characterization of natural fiber‐reinforced composites. Polym Compos2007; 29(2): 187–207.
11.
SelvarajRMPratheeshKCRK, et al.Effects of alkali-silane surface-grafted pineapple fiber on lamina delamination & drilling damage behaviour of hot-water ageing composites. Silicon2024; 17: 279–291.
12.
AzeezMAOregeJI. Bamboo, its chemical modification and products. InTech eBooks. 167-169 Great Portland Street, London, W1W 5PF, UNITED KINGDOM: Intech Open Limited, 2018.
13.
MousaviSRZamaniMEstajiS, et al.Mechanical properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review of recent case studies. J Mater Sci2022; 57: 3143–3167.
14.
NkeuwaWNZhangJSempleKE, et al.Bamboo-based composites: a review on fundamentals and processes of bamboo bonding. Compos B Eng2022; 235: 109776.
15.
BalanAKMottakkunnu ParambilSVakyathS, et al.Coconut shell powder reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane/natural rubber blend-composites: effect of silane coupling agents on the mechanical and thermal properties of the composites. J Mater Sci2017; 52(11): 6712–6725.
16.
SalihSOleiwiJTaliaA. Effect of accelerated weathering on the compressive strength for PMMA nano composites and PMMA hybrids nano composites used in dental applications. Engineering and Technology Journal2017; 35(3): 204–215.
17.
FaheedNKOleiwiJKHamadQA. Effect of weathering on some mechanical properties of prosthetic composites. Mater Today Proc2022; 57: 422–430.
18.
YanLChouwNJayaramanK. Effect of UV and water spraying on the mechanical properties of flax fabric reinforced polymer composites used for civil engineering applications. Mater Des2015; 71: 17–25.
19.
Hadj-DjilaniABougheraraHZitouneR, et al.Assessing the impact of accelerated weathering on the mechanical properties of a flax/epoxy composite: a study on tensile performance and drop-weight impact. Composites Part a Applied Science and Manufacturing2024; 184: 108277.
20.
XuBVan Den HurkBLiuT, et al.Effect of UV‐water weathering on the mechanical properties of flax‐fiber‐reinforced polymer composites. Polym Compos2023; 45(5): 4266–4280.
21.
BalaramakrishnanTMNatarajanSSujathaS. Energy storage and stress–strain characteristics of a prosthetic foot: a priori design and analysis with experiments. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering. 2022; 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3579.
22.
SasakiKPinitlertsakunJRattanakochJ, et al.The development and testing of a modified natural rubber CR solid ankle–cushion heel prosthetic foot for developing countries. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng2017; 4: 2055668317712978.
23.
FalbriardMHuotGJanierM, et al.A functional approach towards the design, development, and test of an affordable dynamic prosthetic foot. PLoS One2022; 17(5): e0266656.
24.
KuanHTNTanMYShenY, et al. Mechanical properties of particulate organic natural filler-reinforced polymer composite: a review. Compos Adv Mater. 2021; 30. doi:10.1177/26349833211007502, https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/26349833211007502.
25.
“Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics D638-14”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2015. DOI: 10.1520/D0638-14.
26.
“Standard Test Method for Tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers D624”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2012. DOI: 10.1520/D0624-00R12.
27.
‘‘Standard Test Methods for rubber properties in compression D575-91”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2012. DOI: 10.1520/D0575-91R12.
28.
‘‘Standard test methods for rubber property —durometer hardness D2240-15”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2015. DOI: 10.1520/D2240-15.
29.
KarekarASchicktanzCTariqM, et al.Effects of artificial weathering in NR/SBR elastomer blends. Polym Degrad Stabil2023; 208: 110267.
30.
“Standard practice for fluorescent ultraviolet (UV) lamp apparatus exposure of D4329-13”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2013. DOI: 10.1520/D4329-13.
31.
“Standard practice for calculation of colour tolerances and colour differences from instrumentally measured colour coordinates D2244-16”, Annual Book of ASTM Standard, New York, 2016. DOI: 10.1520/D2244-16.
32.
MehtaGMohantyAKDrzalLT, et al.Effect of accelerated weathering on bio composites processed by SMC and compression molding. J Polym Environ2006; 14(4): 359–368.
33.
HeCLiBRenY, et al.How the crosslinking agent influences the thermal stability of RTV phenyl silicone rubber. Materials2018; 12(1): 88.
Al-ObaidiAJAhmedSJAbbasA. Investigation the mechanical properties of epoxy polymer by adding natural materials. J Eng Sci Technol2020; 15(4): 2544–2558.
36.
GaoLLiYFuW, et al.Preparation and performance of silicone rubber composites modified by polyurethane. Polymers2023; 15(19): 3920.
37.
ChaharmahaliMTajvidiMNajafiSK. Mechanical properties of wood plastic composite panels made from waste fiberboard and particleboard. Polym Compos2008; 29(6): 606–610.
38.
AbdillaAD’AmbraCAGengZ, et al.Silicone‐based polymer blends: enhancing properties through compatibilization. J Polym Sci2021; 59(19): 2114–2128.
39.
SalihSISalihWMohammedM. Preparation and investigation of flexural strength and impact strength for nano hybrid composite materials of the tri-polymeric blend used in structural applications. Engineering and Technology Journal2018; 36(1B): 12–24.
40.
MaityMKhatuaBBDasCK. Polyblend systems of polyurethane rubber and silicone rubber in the presence of silane grafting agent. J Elastomers Plast2001; 33(3): 211–224.
41.
Vayyaprontavida KaliyathanAVargheseKNairAS, et al.Rubber–rubber blends: a critical review. Prog Rubber Plast Recycl Technol2019; 36(3): 196–242.
42.
JúniorACBarretoARosaD, et al.Thermal and mechanical properties of biocomposites based on a cashew nut shell liquid matrix reinforced with bamboo fibers. J Compos Mater2014; 49(18): 2203–2215.
43.
BahrainSHKRahimNNCAMahmudJ, et al.Hyperelastic properties of bamboo cellulosic Fibre–Reinforced silicone rubber biocomposites via compression test. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23(11): 6338.
44.
DasVSinghASSinghA, et al.Formulation and characterization of silane modified acrylic based transparent organic-inorganic hybrid coatings for improved instrumented indentation hardness of PMMA. Silicon2024; 16: 5243–5256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-024-03079-5
45.
MousaMA. Influence of weather on hardness and surface roughness of maxillofacial elastomeric materials. J Contemp Dent Pract2020; 21(6): 678–682.
46.
DasMChakrabortyD. Effects of alkalization and fiber loading on the mechanical properties and morphology of bamboo fiber composites. II. Resol matrix. J Appl Polym Sci2009; 112(1): 447–453.
47.
SalihSSalihWAbdul hameedMA. Study the effect of adding natural rubber and polymethyl methacrylate to the epoxy resin on the quantitative analysis and its mechanical properties. Engineering and Technology Journal2017; 35(2A): 163–171.
48.
SreekalaMSKumaranMGJosephS, et al.Oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites: influence of fibre surface modifications on the mechanical performance. Applied Composite Materials2000; 7: 295–329.
49.
JosephKMattosoLHCToledoRD, et al.Natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. In: FrolliniELeaoALMattosoLHC (eds). Natural Polymers and Agrofibers Composites. San Carlos: Embrapa, 2000, pp. 159–201. Chapter 4.
50.
Morrison IIIWHArchibaldDSharmaH, et al.Chemical and physical characterization of water- and dew-retted flax fibers. Ind Crop Prod2000; 12(1): 39–46.
51.
MishraSMisraMTripathySS, et al.Potentiality of Pineapple leaf fibre as reinforcement in PALF-Polyester Composite: surface modification and mechanical performance. J Reinforc Plast Compos2001; 20(4): 321–334.
