The main objective of this research was to evaluate the piezoresistive response and mechanical performance of seawater-aged blades manufactured with glass fiber/epoxy resin incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). MWCNTs content was 0.75 wt. %, which was sufficient to form an electric percolation network. MWCNTs were dispersed in the fiber using the spray-coating method, allowing the entire blade outer surface to gain strain self-sensing capability. Exposure of the blades with and without MWCNT to seawater caused a moisture absorption of 1.67% and 1.56%, respectively. This caused damage such as matrix cracking, and fiber/matrix interfacial debonding. These effects were manifested by an increase in tip displacement of 13% and 1.43% in the blades with and without MWCNTs, also local deformations on the blade increased. The MWCNTs induced a positive effect on piezoresistive capability, resulting in the development of sensitivity to deformation. This showed that MWCNTs in the specified content is efficient for damage detection in complex structural components even after seawater aging while retaining maximum electrical resistance change of 0.45% and 0.26% on the tensile and compressive side, respectively. With acoustic emission (AE), it was confirmed that the presence of MWCNTs acts as toughening mechanisms reducing damage such as micro-cracks in the matrix.
PanwarNLKaushikSCKothariS. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2011; 15: 1513–1524.
2.
ApergisNPayneJE. CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Pol2009; 37: 3282–3286.
3.
WinterRA. Innovation and the dynamics of global warming. J Environ Econ Manag2014; 68: 124–140.
4.
MenanteauPFinonDLamyM-L. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Pol2003; 31: 799–812.
5.
FischerCNewellRG. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J Environ Econ Manag2008; 55: 142–162.
6.
PaulAPalmerKWoermanM. Analysis of the Bingaman clean energy standard proposal. Resour Energy Econ2014; 36: 113–129.
7.
BahajAS. Generating electrical power from ocean resources. In: Comprehensive renewable energy. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2012, pp. 1–6.
8.
LangeMA. Renewable energy and water resources. In: Climate vulnerability. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2013, pp. 149–166.
9.
MukhopadhyayRKarisiddaiahSMMukhopadhyayJ. Threat to opportunity. In: Climate change. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 99–117.
10.
MarshG. Tidal turbines harness the power of the sea. Reinforc Plast2004; 48: 44–47.
11.
ZhouHFDouHYQinLZ, et al.A review of full-scale structural testing of wind turbine blades. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 33: 177–187.
12.
FinneganWAllenRGlennonC, et al.Manufacture of high-performance tidal turbine blades using advanced composite manufacturing technologies. Appl Compos Mater2021; 28: 2061–2086.
13.
TianWMaoZDingH. Design, test and numerical simulation of a low-speed horizontal axis hydrokinetic turbine. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng2018; 10: 782–793.
14.
GonabadiHOilaAYadavA, et al.Fatigue life prediction of composite tidal turbine blades. Ocean Eng2022; 260: 111903.
15.
AlamPRobertCÓ BrádaighCM. Tidal turbine blade composites - a review on the effects of hygrothermal aging on the properties of CFRP. Compos B Eng2018; 149: 248–259.
16.
MurrayRBeachRMurdyP, et al.Structural characterization of deployed thermoplastic and thermoset composite tidal turbine blades. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2024.
17.
IslamFCaldwellRPhillipsAW, et al.A review of relevant impact behaviour for improved durability of marine composite propellers. Composites Part C: Open Access2022; 8: 100251.
18.
LiWZhouHLiuH, et al.Review on the blade design technologies of tidal current turbine. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 63: 414–422.
19.
LiuPVeitchB. Design and optimization for strength and integrity of tidal turbine rotor blades. Energy2012; 46: 393–404.
20.
WalkerSRJThiesPRJohanningL. Comparative life cycle assessment of tidal stream turbine blades. Int J Mar Ene2022; 5: 249–256.
RubinoFNisticòATucciF, et al.Marine application of fiber reinforced composites: a review. JMSE2020; 8: 26.
23.
José-TrujilloERubio-GonzálezCRodríguez-GonzálezJA. Seawater ageing effect on the mechanical properties of composites with different fiber and matrix types. J Compos Mater2019; 53: 3229–3241.
24.
ZafarABertoccoFSchjødt-ThomsenJ, et al.Investigation of the long term effects of moisture on carbon fibre and epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 656–666.
25.
MurrayRENevalainenTGracie-OrrK, et al.Passively adaptive tidal turbine blades: design tool development and initial verification. International Journal of Marine Energy2016; 14: 101–124.
26.
ShiWAtlarMRosliR, et al.Cavitation observations and noise measurements of horizontal axis tidal turbines with biomimetic blade leading-edge designs. Ocean Eng2016; 121: 143–155.
27.
GohilPPSainiRP. Coalesced effect of cavitation and silt erosion in hydro turbines—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2014; 33: 280–289.
28.
HassanE. Erosion issues in tidal turbine blades. Glasgow, Scotland: University of Strathclyde, 2023.
29.
Munaweera ThanthirigeTRGogginsJFlanaganM, et al.A state-of-the-art review of structural testing of tidal turbine blades. Energies2023; 16: 4061.
30.
JaksicVSteynorJO’BradaighC (eds) Tidal blade design and testing. In: 4th international conference on offshore renewable energy, CORE 2019, Glasgow, UK, September 2019.
31.
GonabadiHOilaAYadavA, et al.Structural performance of composite tidal turbine blades. Compos Struct2021; 278: 114679.
32.
FaganEMKennedyCRLeenSB, et al.Damage mechanics based design methodology for tidal current turbine composite blades. Renew Energy2016; 97: 358–372.
33.
KennedyCRLeenSBÓ BrádaighCM. Immersed fatigue performance of glass fibre-reinforced composites for tidal turbine blade applications. J Bio Tribo Corros2016; 2: 12.
34.
NachtaneMTarfaouiMAit MohammedM, et al.Effects of environmental exposure on the mechanical properties of composite tidal current turbine. Renew Energy2020; 156: 1132–1145.
35.
DaviesPDumergueNArhantM, et al.Material and structural testing to improve composite tidal turbine blade reliability. Int J Mar Ene2022; 5: 57–65.
36.
RobinAArhantMDaviesP, et al.Effect of aging on the in-plane and out-of-plane mechanical properties of composites for design of marine structures. Compos Part C: Open Access2023; 11: 100354.
37.
RobinADaviesPArhantM, et al.Mechanical performance of sandwich materials with reduced environmental impact for marine structures. Jnl of Sandwich Struct & Mat2024; 26: 99–113.
38.
JiangYFinneganWWallaceF, et al.Structural analysis of a fibre-reinforced composite blade for a 1 MW tidal turbine rotor under degradation of seawater. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy2023; 9: 1–18.
39.
AcetiPCarminatiLBettiniP, et al.Hygrothermal ageing of composite structures. Part 1: technical review. Compos Struct2023; 319: 117076.
40.
XieTWangTHeQ, et al.A review of current issues of marine current turbine blade fault detection. Ocean Eng2020; 218: 108194.
41.
MieloszykMMajewskaKOstachowiczW. Application of embedded fibre Bragg grating sensors for structural health monitoring of complex composite structures for marine applications. Mar Struct2021; 76: 102903.
42.
MalekimoghadamRKrauseSCzichonS. A critical review on the structural health monitoring methods of the composite wind turbine blades. In: Abdel WahabM (ed) Proceedings of 1st international conference on structural damage modelling and assessment, Singapore, December 2021, pp. 409–438. Springer Singapore.
43.
ChanTYuLTamHY, et al.Fiber Bragg grating sensors for structural health monitoring of Tsing Ma bridge: background and experimental observation. Eng Struct2006; 28: 648–659.
44.
YeagerMToddMGregoryW, et al.Assessment of embedded fiber Bragg gratings for structural health monitoring of composites. Struct Health Monit2017; 16: 262–275.
45.
ZhouZLiuWHuangY, et al.Optical fiber Bragg grating sensor assembly for 3D strain monitoring and its case study in highway pavement. Mech Syst Signal Process2012; 28: 36–49.
46.
ZhengRLiuLZhaoX, et al.Investigation of measurability and reliability of adhesive-bonded built-in fiber Bragg grating sensors on steel wire for bridge cable force monitoring. Measurement2018; 129: 349–357.
47.
TseranidisSTheodoridisLLoukogeorgakiE, et al.Investigation of the condition and the behavior of a modular floating structure by harnessing monitoring data. Mar Struct2016; 50: 224–242.
48.
IrfanMSKhanTHussainT, et al.Carbon coated piezoresistive fiber sensors: from process monitoring to structural health monitoring of composites – a review. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2021; 141: 106236.
49.
Rubio-GonzálezCde Urquijo-VenturaMPRodríguez-GonzálezJA. Damage progression monitoring using self-sensing capability and acoustic emission on glass fiber/epoxy composites and damage classification through principal component analysis. Compos B Eng2023; 254: 110608.
50.
HeYLiMMengZ, et al.An overview of acoustic emission inspection and monitoring technology in the key components of renewable energy systems. Mech Syst Signal Process2021; 148: 107146.
51.
ZhangHBilottiEPeijsT. The use of carbon nanotubes for damage sensing and structural health monitoring in laminated composites: a review. Nanocomposites2015; 1: 167–184.
52.
Rodríguez-GonzálezJARubio-GonzálezCKu-HerreraJJ. Influence of seawater ageing on the mechanical and damage self-sensing capability of glass fiber-MWCNT/epoxy laminates subjected to flexural loading by means of the electrical resistance approach. Smart Mater Struct2018; 27: 125002.
53.
Rodríguez-GonzálezJARubio-GonzálezCSoto-CajigaJA. Piezoresistive response of spray-coated multiwalled carbon nanotube/glass fiber/epoxy composites under flexural loading. Fibers Polym2019; 20: 1673–1683.
54.
ZhangHKuwataMBilottiE, et al.Integrated damage sensing in fibre-reinforced composites with extremely low carbon nanotube loadings. J Nanomater2015; 2015: 1–7.
55.
LazaridouIKourkoulisSKAlexopoulosND. Damage monitoring of different concentration carbon nanotube/epoxy glass fiber reinforced composites under quasi-static incremental loadings. Mater Today Proc2019; 12: 262–270.
56.
MaP-CSiddiquiNAMaromG, et al.Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 1345–1367.
57.
LiJMaPCChowWS, et al.Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater2007; 17: 3207–3215.
58.
LiJKimJ-K. Percolation threshold of conducting polymer composites containing 3D randomly distributed graphite nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67: 2114–2120.
59.
Rubio-GonzálezCJosé-TrujilloEAlejandro Rodríguez-GonzálezJ, et al.Strain self-sensing capability of a tidal turbine blade fabricated of PU-foam/glass fiber/epoxy composites using MWCNTs. J Reinforc Plast Compos2023; 42: 363–376.
60.
José-TrujilloERubio-GonzálezCRodríguez-GonzálezJA. Evaluation of the piezoresistive response of GFRP with a combination of MWCNT and GNP exposed to seawater aging. Appl Compos Mater2024; 31: 467–488.
61.
ASTM D5229. Test method for moisture absorption properties and equilibrium conditioning of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2020.
62.
Rodríguez-GonzálezJARubio-GonzálezC. Seawater effects on interlaminar fracture toughness of glass fiber/epoxy laminates modified with multiwall carbon nanotubes. J Compos Mater2021; 55: 387–400.
63.
IEC 61400-23. Wind turbines generator systems – part 23: full-scale structural testing of rotor blades. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC, 2014.
64.
IEC TS 62600-3:2020. Marine energy – wave, tidal and other water current converters – Part 3: measurement of mechanical loads. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC, 2020.
65.
ZulfliNMBakarAAChowWS. Mechanical and water absorption behaviors of carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy/glass fiber laminates. J Reinforc Plast Compos2013; 32: 1715–1721.
66.
ChamisCC. Mechanics of load transfer at the fiber/matrix interface. Cleveland, OH: NASA.
67.
ColinXVerduJ. Humid ageing of organic matrix composites. In: DaviesPRajapakseYD (eds) Durability of composites in a marine environment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 47–114.
68.
YuBYangJ. 1.20 hygrothermal effects in composites. In: Comprehensive composite materials II. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 502–519.
69.
José-TrujilloERubio-GonzálezCRodríguez-GonzálezJA. Study of seawater effect on the mechanical and thermomechanical properties of hybrid multiwall carbon nanotube/graphene nanoplatelet-glass fiber/epoxy laminates. Polym Compos2022; 43: 8673–8686.
70.
HammamiAAl-GhuilaniN. Durability and environmental degradation of glass-vinylester composites. Polym Compos2004; 25: 609–616.
71.
HuangSFuQYanL, et al.Characterization of interfacial properties between fibre and polymer matrix in composite materials – a critical review. J Mater Res Technol2021; 13: 1441–1484.
72.
LuXYvonnetJDetrezF, et al.Multiscale modeling of nonlinear electric conductivity in graphene-reinforced nanocomposites taking into account tunnelling effect. J Comput Phys2017; 337: 116–131.
73.
GongSZhuZHLiZ. Electron tunnelling and hopping effects on the temperature coefficient of resistance of carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposites. Phys Chem Chem Phys2017; 19: 5113–5120.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
