Prediction of elastic properties of plain weave composites using two well-known micromechanical models is addressed, along with a dedicated finite element model of the unit cell which includes details of the woven architecture. Predictions of micromechanical models are carried out using geometric input parameters statistically measured from micrographies of the unit cell of the plain weave composite and compared to finite element predictions and to measured elastic properties of an E-glass/vinyl ester plain weave composite. The micromechanical models predict that the width and thickness of the yarn in the fill and warp directions greatly influence the elastic properties and anisotropy of the plain weave composite. Good agreement between all approaches and the measured values is observed for the in-plane elastic properties, as long as the input geometric parameters of the unit cell required for the models are measured with statistical rigor. However, transverse shear moduli are not accurately predicted by the examined micromechanical models, only by the finite element method. Reasons for such discrepancies are discussed and supported by modeling findings and digital image correlation full field strain maps.
IvanovDSLomovSV. Modelling the structure and behaviour of 2D and 3D woven composites used in aerospace applications. Polymer Composites in the Aerospace Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015, pp. 21–52. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-85709-523-7.00002-5.
DonadonMVFalzonBGIannucciL, et al.A 3-D micromechanical model for predicting the elastic behaviour of woven laminates. Compos Sci Technol2007; 67(11–12): 2467–2477. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.019.
6.
ChenQChenXYangZ, et al.Micromechanical modeling of plain woven polymer composites via 3D finite‐volume homogenization. Polym Compos2018; 39(9): 3022–3032. DOI: 10.1002/pc.24305.
7.
RoufKLiuXYuW. Multiscale structural analysis of textile composites using mechanics of structure genome. Int J Solid Struct2018; 136: 89–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.005.
8.
Heide-JørgensenSBudzikMKIbsenCH. Three-dimensional, multiscale homogenization for hybrid woven composites with fiber-matrix debonding. Compos Sci Technol2022; 218: 109204. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109204.
9.
MulaySSUdhayaramanR. On the constitutive modelling and damage behaviour of plain woven textile composite. Int J Solid Struct2019; 156: 73–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.08.002.
10.
Espadas-EscalanteJJvan DijkNPIsakssonP. A study on the influence of boundary conditions in computational homogenization of periodic structures with application to woven composites. Compos Struct2017; 160: 529–537. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.082.
AdumitroaieABarberoEJ. Stiffness and strength prediction for plain weave textile reinforced composites. Mech Adv Mater Struct2012; 19(1–3): 169–183. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2011.572245.
15.
TabieiAYiW. Comparative study of predictive methods for woven fabric composite elastic properties. Compos Struct2002; 58(1): 149–164. DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00028-4.
16.
ScidaDAbouraZBenzeggaghML, et al.Prediction of the elastic behaviour of hybrid and non-hybrid woven composites. Compos Sci Technol1998; 57(12): 1727–1740. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00105-X.
17.
López-SantosFMay-PatALedesma-OrozcoER, et al.Measurement of in-plane and out-of-plane elastic properties of woven fabric composites using digital image correlation. J Compos Mater2021; 55(9): 1231–1246. DOI: 10.1177/0021998320967073.
18.
GhazimoradiMCarvelliVNaouarN, et al.Experimental measurements and numerical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of a glass plain weave composite reinforcement. J Reinforc Plast Compos2020; 39(1–2): 45–59. DOI: 10.1177/0731684419868846.
19.
GonabadiHOilaAYadavA, et al.Investigation of anisotropy effects in glass fibre reinforced polymer composites on tensile and shear properties using full field strain measurement and finite element multi-scale techniques. J Compos Mater2022; 56(3): 507–524. DOI: 10.1177/00219983211054232.
20.
OlaveMVanaerschotALomovSV, et al.Internal geometry variability of two woven composites and related variability of the stiffness. Polym Compos2012; 33(8): 1335–1350. DOI: 10.1002/pc.22260.
21.
GoldsmithMBSankarBVHaftkaRT, et al.Effects of microstructural variability on thermo-mechanical properties of a woven ceramic matrix composite. J Compos Mater2015; 49(3): 335–350.
22.
ZhuCZhuPLiuZ, et al.Prediction of the elastic properties of a plain woven carbon fiber reinforced composite with internal geometric variability. Automot Innov2018; 1(2): 147–157. DOI: 10.1007/s42154-018-0015-y.
23.
YeJCaiHLiuL, et al.Microscale intrinsic properties of hybrid unidirectional/woven composite laminates: Part I experimental tests. Compos Struct2021; 262: 113369. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113369.
24.
ASTM Standard D3171. Standard test methods for constituent content of composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2006.
25.
LucianoRBarberoEJ. Formulas for the stiffness of composites with periodic microstructure. Int J Solid Struct1994; 31(21): 2933–2944. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90060-4.
26.
ManeraM. Elastic properties of randomly oriented short fiber-glass composites. J Compos Mater1977; 11(2): 235–247. DOI: 10.1177/002199837701100208.
27.
GusevAAHinePJWardIM. Fiber packing and elastic properties of a transversely random unidirectional glass/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(4): 535–541. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00152-9.
28.
BarberoEJDamianiTMTrovillionJ. Micromechanics of fabric reinforced composites with periodic microstructure. Int J Solid Struct2005; 42(9-10): 2489–2504. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.09.034.
29.
ScidaDAbouraZBenzeggaghML. A micromechanics model for 3D elasticity and failure of woven-fibre composite materials. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59(4): 505–517. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00096-7.
30.
FalzonPJHerszbergIKarbhariVM. Effects of compaction on the stiffness and strength of plain weave fabric RTM composites. J Compos Mater1996; 30(11): 1210–1247. DOI: 10.1177/002199839603001103.
31.
DodgeY. The concise encyclopedia of statistics. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-32833-1.
32.
Aramis user information-Hardware. Sensor configuration examples. GOM mbH. Braunschweig, Germany: Aramis user information-Hardware, 2013.
33.
ASTM Standard D3039. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2000.
34.
ASTM Standard D5379. Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by the V-notched beam method. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2005.
35.
ANSYS release 12.0. Canonsburg, PA: Swanson analysis systems, Inc.
36.
LiSZhouCYuH, et al.Formulation of a unit cell of a reduced size for plain weave textile composites. Comput Mater Sci2011; 50(5): 1770–1780. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.013.
37.
BarberoEJTrovillionJMayugoJA, et al.Finite element modeling of plain weave fabrics from photomicrograph measurements. Compos Struct2006; 73(1): 41–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.030.
38.
BacarrezaOWenPAliabadiMH. Micromechanical modelling of textile composites. Woven Composites. London: Imperial College Press, 2015.
39.
BukenyaKOlayaMNPinedaEJ, et al.Effect of boundary conditions on process-induced stresses in a plain weave unit cell. In: American society for composites 2021. OchoaO (ed); Lancaster PA: USA: DEStech Publications, Inc, 2021.
40.
WhitcombJDChapmanCDTangX. Derivation of boundary conditions for micromechanics analyses of plain and satin weave composites. J Compos Mater2000; 34(9): 724–747. DOI: 10.1177/002199830003400901.
41.
TangXWhitcombJD. General techniques for exploiting periodicity and symmetries in micromechanics analysis of textile composites. J Compos Mater2003; 37(13): 1167–1189. DOI: 10.1177/0021998303037013003.
DixitAMaliHSMisraRK. Unit cell model of woven fabric textile composite for multiscale analysis. Procedia Eng2013; 68: 352–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.191.
44.
HuangZM. The mechanical properties of composites reinforced with woven and braided fabrics. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60(4): 479–498. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00148-7.
45.
LeeSKByunJHHongSH. Effect of fiber geometry on the elastic constants of the plain woven fabric reinforced aluminum matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater2003; 347(1–2): 346–358. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00614-7.
46.
Abu BakarIAKramerOBordasS, et al.Optimization of elastic properties and weaving patterns of woven composites. Compos Struct2013; 100: 575–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.043.
47.
ByströmJJekabsonsNVarnaJ. An evaluation of different models for prediction of elastic properties of woven composites. Compos B Eng2000; 31(1): 7–20. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-8368(99)00061-X.
48.
Heidari-RaraniMBashandeh-Khodaei-NaeiniKMirkhalafS. Micromechanical modeling of the mechanical behavior of unidirectional composites–A comparative study. J Reinforc Plast Compos2018; 37(16): 1051–1071. DOI: 10.1177/0731684418779441.
49.
RajuBHiremathSRRoy MahapatraD. A review of micromechanics based models for effective elastic properties of reinforced polymer matrix composites. Compos Struct2018; 204: 607–619. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.125.
VarnaJPupureL. Characterization of viscoelasticity, viscoplasticity, and damage in composites. Creep and fatigue in polymer matrix composites. Woodhead Publishing, 2019, pp. 497–530. DOI: 10.1533/9780857090430.3.514.
52.
ShokriehMMGhasemiRMosalmaniR. A general micromechanical model to predict elastic and strength properties of balanced plain weave fabric composites. J Compos Mater2017; 51(20): 2863–2878. DOI: 10.1177/0021998317716530.
53.
LeeJWKimJJYoonGH. Stress constraint topology optimization using layerwise theory for composite laminates. Compos Struct2019; 226: 111184. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111184.
54.
KimJHRyouHLeeMG, et al.Micromechanical modeling of fiber reinforced composites based on elastoplasticity and its application for 3D braided glass/Kevlar composites. Polym Compos2007; 28(6): 722–732, DOI: 10.1002/pc.20357.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
