Hybrid reinforcement of steel and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars can provide a balanced performance between strength, ductility, and durability for the concrete structures. Thus, this study evaluates the shear performance of hybrid Basalt-FRP/steel-RC beams without shear reinforcement. A total of twelve RC beams were cast and tested under four-point loading to study the influence of reinforcement type, reinforcement ratio of longitudinal bars and axial stiffness between FRP and steel ratio, on the shear performance of the concrete beams. The test results were analyzed in terms of crack patterns, load-midspan deflection, load-crack width relationships, and shear strength of the tested beams. In addition, the experimental results were compared with the theoretical results obtained from various design codes and guidelines. Moreover, a finite element (FE) model was created, and the experimental results were used for validation of the FE model. The test results revealed that the beam specimens designed with similar effective reinforcement ratio exhibits comparable shear strength nevertheless the tensile reinforcement used. Experimental test results demonstrated that using hybrid bars increased the shear capacity of the beams by 11% compared to steel bars. Furthermore, the energy absorption of the hybrid-RC beams was enhanced by 16% compared to FRP-RC beams. By elevating the ratio from 1.25 to 2.44, both the shear strength and energy absorption improved by approximately 10%. Notably, there was a significant decrease in the deflection and crack width of the hybrid-RC beams in comparison to the FRP-RC beams. The design codes ACI440.11-22 and CSA S806-12 displayed accurate enough estimates of the shear strength, while JSCE-1997 showed a conservative result.
QuWZhangXHuangH. Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars. J Compos Construct2009; 13(5): 350–359. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000035.
2.
DingLLeiMWangX, et al.Durability of concrete members reinforced with steel-FRP composite bars under dry-wet cycles of seawater. Structures2021; 33: 2273–2283. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.073.
3.
ShenWFengLLiuX, et al.Multiwall Carbon nanotubes-reinforced epoxy hybrid coatings with high electrical conductivity and corrosion resistance prepared via electrostatic spraying. Prog Org Coating2016; 90: 139–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.10.006.
4.
DongZWuGZhaoXL, et al.The durability of seawater sea-sand concrete beams reinforced with metal bars or non-metal bars in the ocean environment. Adv Struct Eng2020; 23(2): 334–347. DOI: 10.1177/1369433219870580.
5.
XiaoSHLinJXLiLJ, et al.Experimental study on flexural behavior of concrete beam reinforced with GFRP and steel-fiber composite bars. J Build Eng2021; 43: 103087. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103087.
6.
ZhangTOehlersDJVisintinP. Shear strength of FRP RC beams and one-way slabs without stirrups. J Compos Construct2014; 18(5): 04014007. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000469.
7.
BankLCCampbellTIDolanCW. Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars Reported. Michigan: ACI Committee, 2003, vol 440.
8.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre Reinforced Polymers. CAN/CSA S806-12. Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA, 2012.
9.
JSCE (Japanese Society of Civil Engineering). Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fibre reinforcing materials. Tokyo: JSCE, 1997.
10.
CaiJPanJZhouX. Flexural behavior of basalt FRP reinforced ECC and concrete beams. Construct Build Mater2017; 142: 423–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.087.
11.
El RefaiAAbedFAl-rahmaniA. Structural performance and serviceability of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars. Construct Build Mater2015; 96: 518–529. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.063.
12.
EscórcioPFrançaPM. Experimental study of a rehabilitation solution that uses GFRP bars to replace the steel bars of reinforced concrete beams. Eng Struct2016; 128: 166–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.013.
13.
El-NemrAAhmedEABenmokraneB. Flexural behavior and serviceability of normal- and high-strength concrete beams reinforced with Glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars. ACI Struct J2013; 110(6): 1077–1087.
14.
WangXAliNMDingL, et al.Static behavior of RC deck slabs partially prestressed with hybrid fiber. Reinforced Polymer Tendons2018; 19: 1–13. DOI: 10.1002/suco.201700240.
15.
AielloMAOmbresL. Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (Fiber-Reinforced polymer-steel) reinforcements. J Compos Construct2002; 6(2): 133–140. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133).
16.
LiuSWangXAliYMS, et al.Experimental study on eccentric compression behavior of slender rectangular concrete columns reinforced with steel and BFRP bars. Eng Struct2023; 293: 116626. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116626.
17.
YinghaoLYongY. Arrangement of hybrid rebars on flexural behavior of HSC beams. Composites Part B2013; 45(1): 22–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.023.
18.
AliYMSWangXLiuS, et al.Behavior of concrete bridge-deck slabs reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer and steel bars. ACI Struct J2023; 120: 1–18. DOI: 10.14359/51738840.
19.
YangYSunZYWuG, et al.Flexural capacity and design of hybrid FRP-steel-reinforced concrete beams. Adv Struct Eng2020; 23(7): 1290–1304. DOI: 10.1177/1369433219894236.
20.
RuanXLuCXuK, et al.Flexural behavior and serviceability of concrete beams hybrid-reinforced with GFRP bars and steel bars. Compos Struct2020; 235: 111772. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111772.
21.
Al-sunnaRPilakoutasKHajirasoulihaI, et al.Deflection behaviour of FRP reinforced concrete beams and slabs : an experimental investigation. Composer Part B2012; 43(5): 2125–2134. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.03.007.
22.
RuanXLuCXuK, et al.Flexural behavior and serviceability of concrete beams hybrid-reinforced with GFRP bars and steel bars. Compos Struct2020; 235: 111772. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111772.
23.
LiuSWangXDingJ, et al.Design methods and recommendations for flexural concrete beams reinforced with steel-fiber composite bars. Eng Struct2024; 310: 118139. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118139.
24.
LiuSWangXAliYMS, et al.Flexural behavior and design of under-reinforced concrete beams with BFRP and steel bars. Eng Struct2022; 263: 114386. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114386.
25.
LiuSWangXAliYMS, et al.Evaluation of deflection calculation for hybrid reinforced concrete with FRP and steel bars. ACI Struct J; 121(4): 26–32. DOI: 10.14359/51740717.
26.
LiuSWangXAliYMS, et al.Flexural performance and design of concrete beams reinforced with BFRP and steel bars. J Compos Construct2023; 27(6): 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114386.
27.
QuWZhangXHuangH. Flexural behavior of concrete beams reinforced with hybrid (GFRP and steel) bars. J Compos Construct2009; 13(5): 350–359. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000035.
28.
El-SayedAKEl-SalakawyEFBenmokraneB. Shear strength of FRP-reinforced concrete beams without transverse reinforcement. ACI Struct J2006; 103(2): 228–241.
29.
AlamMSHusseinAEffect of member depth on shear strength of polymer – reinforced concrete beams. 2012, 16, 119–126. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000248.
30.
AlamMSHusseinA. Unified shear design equation for concrete members reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer without stirrups. J Compos Construct2013; 17(5): 575–583. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000342.
31.
El-SayedAKEl-SalakawyEFBenmokraneB. Shear capacity of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars. ACI Struct J2006; 103(3): 383–389. DOI: 10.14359/15316.
32.
El-SayedAKEl-SalakawyEFBenmokraneB. Shear capacity of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars. ACI Struct J2006; 103(3): 383–389.
33.
AliYMSWangXDingL, et al.Experimental and numerical investigations of the effects of various tensile reinforcement types on the structural behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs. Eng Struct2023; 285: 116036. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116036.
34.
ASTM. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products, 2017. West Conshohocken: ASTM, vol 01.03.
35.
ASTM. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars, 2016. West Conshohocken: ASTM.
36.
ACI 318-19. Building code (ACI 318-19) and commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete, 2019. Miami: ACI 318R-19.
37.
AliYMSWangXAbdelaleemT, et al.Numerical study on the structural performance of the continuous concrete slabs reinforced with hybrid BFRP/steel bars. Struct Concr2023; 24: 1–25. DOI: 10.1002/suco.202201079.
38.
WangXLiuSShiY, et al.Integrated high-performance concrete beams reinforced with hybrid BFRP and steel bars. J Struct Eng2022; 148(1): 06018001. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003207.
39.
El RefaiAAbedF. Concrete contribution to shear strength of beams reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced bars. J Compos Construct2016; 20(4). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000648.
40.
ABAQUS. Version 6.14. Paris: Dassault Systemes: 3DS Paris Campus; 2014.
41.
CarreiraDJChuK. Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression. ACI Struct J1985; 82: 797–804.
42.
IbrahimHAFahmyMFMWuZ. Numerical study of steel-to-FRP reinforcement ratio as a design-tool controlling the lateral response of SFRC beam-column joints. Eng Struct2018; 172: 253–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.102.
43.
GenikomsouASPolakMA. Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS. Eng Struct2015; 98: 38–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.016.
44.
QinRZhouALauD. Effect of reinforcement ratio on the flexural performance of hybrid FRP reinforced concrete beams. Composer Part B2017; 108: 200–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.054.
