The present study is devoted to investigating the mechanical characteristics of a novel natural rubber (NR)-based elastomer nanocomposite reinforced with carbon black and alumina nanoparticles acting as partial and primary reinforcements, respectively. Before conducting various mechanical tests on the specimens, the vulcanization properties of this elastomer nanocomposite was surveyed. It is demonstrated that adding the alumina nanoparticles to the NR-based elastomer matrix can significantly reduce the cure time and improve the quality of the vulcanizates. Then, the influence of alumina nanoparticles on the modulus, tensile strength, elongation at break, and energy absorption capacity of the elastomer nanocomposite were assessed, and the ideal nanoparticles’ weight percentage was determined to be 10%. This is supported by calculating the Reinforcing Efficiency Parameter (REP), indicating that the elastomer nanocomposite with 10% alumina has the best reinforcing efficiency in tensile properties. Also, using the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB), it was found that the material is exceptionally strain-rate sensitive, and the specimens exhibited much higher values of stiffness and energy absorption under high strain-rate loading. It is inferred from the results that the elastomer nanocomposite reinforced with the optimal amount of alumina nanoparticles can be an excellent candidate for energy absorption applications under high strain-rate loadings.
HeinrichGKlüppelMVilgisTA. Reinforcement of elastomers. Curr Opinion Solid State Mater Sci2002; 6: 195–203.
2.
LeblancJL. Rubber–filler interactions and rheological properties in filled compounds. Prog Polym Sci2002; 27: 627–687.
3.
WangM-J. Effect of polymer-filler and filler-filler interactions on dynamic properties of filled vulcanizates. Rubber Chem Technol1998; 71: 520–589.
4.
HanJHeXGuoW, et al.Effects of filler–rubber interaction on dynamic mechanical properties and reinforcement of NR vulcanisates. Plastics, Rubber Compos2007; 36: 149–154.
5.
ChuayjuljitSImvittayaANa-ranongN, et al.Effects of particle size and amount of carbon black and calcium carbonate on curing characteristics and dynamic mechanical properties of natural rubber. J Met Mater Minerals2002; 12: 51–57.
6.
AzuraAGhazaliSMariattiM. Effects of the filler loading and aging time on the mechanical and electrical conductivity properties of carbon black filled natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 110: 747–752.
7.
IsmailHRusliAAzuraA, et al.The effect of partial replacement of paper sludge by commercial fillers on natural rubber composites. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2008; 27: 1877–1891.
8.
ChoiSSNahCJoBW. Properties of natural rubber composites reinforced with silica or carbon black: influence of cure accelerator content and filler dispersion. Polym Int2003; 52: 1382–1389.
9.
HashimAAzahariBIkedaY, et al.The effect of bis (3-triethoxysilylpropyl) tetrasulfide on silica reinforcement of styrene-butadiene rubber. Rubber Chem Technol1998; 71: 289–299.
10.
MiharaS. Reactive processing of silica-reinforced tire rubber: new insight into the time-and temperature-dependence of silica rubber interaction, 2009.
11.
Ten BrinkeJDebnathSReuvekampLA, et al.Mechanistic aspects of the role of coupling agents in silica–rubber composites. Compos Sci Technol2003; 63: 1165–1174.
12.
RattanasomNSaowaparkTDeeprasertkulC. Reinforcement of natural rubber with silica/carbon black hybrid filler. Polym Testing2007; 26: 369–377.
13.
FröhlichJNiedermeierWLuginslandH-D. The effect of filler–filler and filler–elastomer interaction on rubber reinforcement. Compos A Appl Sci Manufac2005; 36: 449–460.
14.
RobertsonCGLinCRackaitisM, et al.Influence of particle size and polymer− filler coupling on viscoelastic glass transition of particle-reinforced polymers. Macromolecules2008; 41: 2727–2731.
15.
GangulyAGeorgeJJKarS, et al.Rubber nanocomposites based on miscellaneous nanofillers. In: Current topics in elastomers research. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2008, pp. 89–100.
CasaliniRBogoslovovRQadriS, et al.Nanofiller reinforcement of elastomeric polyurea. Polymer2012; 53: 1282–1287.
18.
MeeraASaidSGrohensY, et al.Tensile stress relaxation studies of TiO2 and nanosilica filled natural rubber composites. Ind Eng Chem Res2009; 48: 3410–3416.
19.
QuLHuangGLiuZ, et al.Remarkable reinforcement of natural rubber by deformation-induced crystallization in the presence of organophilic montmorillonite. Acta Materialia2009; 57: 5053–5060.
20.
MittalVKimJKPalK. Recent advances in elastomeric nanocomposites. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.
21.
PalKRajasekarRKangDJ, et al.Effect of fillers on natural rubber/high styrene rubber blends with nano silica: morphology and wear. Mater Des2010; 31: 677–686.
22.
IsmailHRamliR. Organoclay filled natural rubber nanocomposites: the effects of filler loading and mixing method. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2008; 27: 1909–1924.
23.
MohanTKuriakoseJKannyK. Effect of nanoclay reinforcement on structure, thermal and mechanical properties of natural rubber–styrene butadine rubber (NR–SBR). J Ind Eng Chem2011; 17: 264–270.
24.
TarawnehMAAhmadSHYahyaS, et al.Mechanical properties of thermoplastic natural rubber reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2011; 30: 363–368.
25.
BerkiPLászlóKTungNT, et al.Natural rubber/graphene oxide nanocomposites via melt and latex compounding: comparison at very low graphene oxide content. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2017; 36: 808–817.
26.
SrivastavaASharmaS. Recent advances in experimental and molecular dynamics study of graphene-oxide/natural rubber composites: a review. J Reinforced Plastics Compos2022.
27.
DattaJKosiorekPWłochM. Effect of high loading of titanium dioxide particles on the morphology, mechanical and thermo-mechanical properties of the natural rubber-based composites. Iran Polym J2016; 25: 1021–1035.
28.
RoyKJatejarungwongCPotiyarajP. Development of highly reinforced maleated natural rubber nanocomposites based on sol–gel‐derived nano alumina. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135: 46248.
29.
LinJ-lSuS-mHeY-b, et al.Improving thermal and mechanical properties of the alumina filled silicone rubber composite by incorporating carbon nanotubes. New Carbon Mater2020; 35: 66–72.
30.
HeSHuJZhangC, et al.Performance improvement in nano-alumina filled silicone rubber composites by using vinyl tri-methoxysilane. Polym Test2018; 67: 295–301.
31.
RoyKPotiyarajP. Exploring the comparative effect of silane coupling agents with different functional groups on the cure, mechanical and thermal properties of nano-alumina (Al 2 O 3)-based natural rubber (NR) compounds. Polym Bull2019; 76: 883–902.
32.
VinodPDesaiBASarathiR, et al.Investigation on the electrical, thermal and mechanical properties of silicone rubber nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectrics Electr Insul2019; 26: 1876–1884.
33.
YeswinCVamsiDVijayB, et al.Physical properties of nano Al2O3 reinforced NBR/SBR blends. Mater Today Proc2021.
34.
FanJWeerheijmJSluysL. High-strain-rate tensile mechanical response of a polyurethane elastomeric material. Polymer2015; 65: 72–80.
35.
RolandCTwiggJVuY, et al.High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer2007; 48: 574–578.
36.
ZhouJHeissererUDukePW, et al.The sensitivity of the tensile properties of PMMA, Kevlar® and Dyneema® to temperature and strain rate. Polymer2021; 225: 123781.
37.
WangKCaiRZhangZ, et al.Compressive behaviors of 3D printed polypropylene-based composites at low and high strain rates. Polym Test2021; 103: 107321.
38.
ZhangJzhong ShenHZhangX, et al.Experimental and theoretical investigation of mechanical behavior related to temperature, humidity and strain rate on silane-modified polyurethane sealant. Polym Test2021; 103: 107370.
39.
FengSLinYYuW, et al.Stretch-induced structural transition of linear low-density polyethylene during uniaxial stretching under different strain rates. Polymer2021; 226: 123795.
40.
YangHYaoXZhengZ, et al.Highly sensitive and stretchable graphene-silicone rubber composites for strain sensing. Compos Sci Technol2018; 167: 371–378.
41.
PanampillyBThomasS. Nano ZnO as cure activator and reinforcing filler in natural rubber. Polym Eng Sci2013; 53: 1337–1346.
42.
KhodadadiALiaghatGAhmadiH, et al.Impact response of Kevlar/rubber composite. Compos Sci Technol2019; 184: 107880.
43.
KhodadadiALiaghatGBahramianAR, et al.High velocity impact behavior of Kevlar/rubber and Kevlar/epoxy composites: a comparative study. Compos Struct2019; 216: 159–167.
44.
ColakÖUBahlouliNUzunsoyD, et al.High strain rate behavior of graphene-epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Test2020; 81: 106219.
45.
RameshKT. High rates and impact experiments. Handbook Experiment Solid Mech2008; 933: 929.
46.
ChenWWSongB. Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar: design, testing and applications. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
47.
BaiYLiuCHuangG, et al.A hyper-viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea under uniaxial compressive loading. Polymers2016; 8: 133.
48.
RolandC. Mechanical behavior of rubber at high strain rates. Rubber Chem Technol2006; 79: 429–459.
49.
Sae‐ouiPSirisinhaCWantanaT, et al.Influence of silica loading on the mechanical properties and resistance to oil and thermal aging of CR/NR blends. J Appl Polymer Sci2007; 104: 3478–3483.
50.
DasCBansodNDKapgateBP, et al.Incorporation of titania nanoparticles in elastomer matrix to develop highly reinforced multifunctional solution styrene butadiene rubber composites. Polymer2019; 162: 1–10.
51.
PaderniKMorselliDBondioliF, et al.EPDM rubber reinforced with titania generated by nonhydrolytic sol‐gel process. Polym Eng Sci2014; 54: 2544–2552.
52.
KuesengKJacobK. Natural rubber nanocomposites with SiC nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Eur Polym J2006; 42: 220–227.
53.
PalKRajasekarRKangDJ, et al.Effect of epoxidized natural rubber–organoclay nanocomposites on NR/high styrene rubber blends with fillers. Mater Des2009; 30: 4035–4042.
54.
SongBChenW. One-dimensional dynamic compressive behavior of EPDM rubber. J Eng Mater Technol2003; 125: 294–301.
SarvaSSDeschanelSBoyceMC, et al.Stress–strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer2007; 48: 2208–2213.
57.
GobleDWolffE. Strain-rate sensitivity index of thermoplastics. J Mater Sci1993; 28: 5986–5994.
58.
ZhangQZhangJWangY. Effect of strain rate on the tension–compression asymmetric responses of Ti–6.6 Al–3.3 Mo–1.8 Zr–0.29 Si. Mater Des2014; 61: 281–285.
59.
ZaiemyekehZLiaghatGAhmadiH, et al.Effect of strain rate on deformation behavior of aluminum matrix composites with Al2O3 nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng A2019; 753: 276–284.
60.
AhmadiHLiaghatGShokriehM, et al.Compressive properties of nanoclay-reinforced syntactic foams at quasi-static and high strain rate loading. Polym-plastics Technol Eng2014; 53: 990–999.
