Strain monitoring is of great interest in order to check components structural life, to prevent catastrophic failures, and, possibly, to predict residual life in case of unexpected events. In this study, strain sensing epoxy-based coatings containing carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs), and a mix of the two (MWCNT+GNP) have been produced, with the same initial electrical resistivity, and applied on glass fiber reinforced composites. Morphological, mechanical, and electrical tests have been then performed evaluating the resistance variation and the strain sensing performance of the sensors. A theoretical model to relate the resulting gauge factors to the different types of nanofillers has been applied. The results showed that all systems present a strain sensing performance with different gauge factors (and hence sensitivity) at low strain: GNP samples showed the highest gauge factor (10.3), MWCNT samples the lowest (1.5), and the mixed system lies in the middle (4.3). From analytical analysis, the value of initial distance among conductive particles was found to be 0.3 nm in the case of MWCNT and 1.2 nm for GNP, explaining why the gauge factors of the produced sensors are different.
SchulteKBaronC. Load and failure analyses of CFRP laminates by means of electrical resistivity measurements. Compos Sci Technol1989; 36: 63–76.
2.
PrabhakaranR. Damage assessment though electrical resistance measurement in graphite fiber-reinforced composites. Exp Tech1990; 14: 16–20.
3.
ChungDDL. Structural health monitoring by electrical resistance measurement. Smart Mater Struct2001; 10: 624–636.
4.
NanniFAuricchioFSarchiF, et al.Self-sensing CF-GFRP rods as mechanical reinforcement and sensors of concrete beams. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15: 182–186.
5.
CaporaleAFeoLHuiD, et al.Debonding of FRP in multi-span masonry arch structures via limit analysis. Compos Struct2014; 108: 856–865.
6.
QureshiYTarfaouiMLafdiK. Multi-mode real-time strain monitoring in composites using low vacuum carbon fibers as a strain sensor under different loading conditions. Smart Mater Struct2020; 29: 085035.
7.
OkuharaYMatsubaraH. Carbon-matrix composites with continuous glass fiber and carbon black for maximum strain sensing. Carbon2007; 45: 1152–1159.
8.
NanniFRuscitoGPugliaD, et al.Effect of carbon black nanoparticle intrinsic properties on the self-monitoring performance of glass fibre reinforced composite rods. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 1–8.
9.
PattiABarrettaRMarotti de SciarraF, et al.Flexural properties of multi-wall carbon nanotube/polypropylene composites: Experimental investigation and nonlocal modeling. Compos Struct2015; 131: 282–289.
10.
RabbiMFChalivendraV. Strain and damage sensing in additively manufactured CB/ABS polymer composites. Polym Test2020; 90: 106688.
11.
EsmaeiliASbarufattiCJiménez‐SuárezA, et al.Piezoresistive characterization of epoxy based nanocomposites loaded with SWCNTs‐DWCNTs in tensile and fracture tests. Polym Compos2020; 41: 2598–2609.
12.
CaoXWeiXLiG, et al.Strain sensing behaviors of epoxy nanocomposites with carbon nanotubes under cyclic deformation. Polymer2017; 112: 1–9.
13.
MoricheRSánchezMJiménez-SuárezA, et al.Strain monitoring mechanisms of sensors based on the addition of graphene nanoplatelets into an epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol2016; 123: 65–70.
14.
MutoNAraiYShinSG, et al.Hybrid composites with self-diagnosing function for preventing fatal fracture. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 875–883.
15.
NanniFRuscitoGForteG, et al.Design, manufacture and testing of self-sensing carbon fibre-glass fibre reinforced polymer rods. Smart Mater Struct2007; 16: 2368–2374.
ThostensonETChouT-W. Carbon nanotube networks: Sensing of distributed strain and damage for life prediction and self healing. Adv Mater2006; 18: 2837–2841.
18.
CelzardAMcRaeEDeleuzeC, et al.Critical concentration in percolating systems containing a high-aspect-ratio filler. Phys Rev B1996; 53: 6209–6214.
19.
Munson-McgeeSH. Estimation of the critical concentration in an anisotropic percolation network. Phys Rev B1991; 43: 3331–3336.
YiJYChoiGM. Percolation behavior of conductor-insulator composites with varying aspect ratio of conductive fiber. J Electroceramics1999; 3: 361–369.
22.
BauhoferWKovacsJZ. A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Tech2009; 69: 1486–1498.
23.
LinVWJLiMLynchJP, et al.Mechanical and electrical characterization of self-sensing carbon black ECC. In: Nondestructive characterization for composite materials, aerospace engineering, civil infrastructure, and homeland security, San Diego, CA, 7–10 March, 2011, p. 798316.
24.
LogakisEPissisPPospiechD, et al.Low electrical percolation threshold in poly(ethylene terephthalate)/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Eur Polym J2010; 46: 928–936.
25.
HuNMasudaZYanC, et al.The electrical properties of polymer nanocomposites with carbon nanotube fillers. Nanotechnology2008; 19: 215701.
26.
Al-SalehMHSundararajU. A review of vapor grown carbon nanofiber/polymer conductive composites. Carbon2009; 47: 2–22.
27.
PianaFPionteckJ. Effect of the melt processing conditions on the conductive paths formation in thermoplastic polyurethane/expanded graphite (TPU/EG) composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 80: 39–46.
28.
LuoSLiuT. Graphite nanoplatelet enabled embeddable fiber sensor for in situ curing monitoring and structural health monitoring of polymeric composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014; 6: 9314–9320.
29.
BaeS-HLeeYSharmaBK, et al.Graphene-based transparent strain sensor. Carbon2013; 51: 236–242.
Bautista-QuijanoJRAvilésFAguilarJO, et al.Strain sensing capabilities of a piezoresistive MWCNT-polysulfone film. Sensors and Actuators A: Phys2010; 159: 135–140.
32.
KumarSGuptaTKVaradarajanKM. Strong, stretchable and ultrasensitive MWCNT/TPU nanocomposites for piezoresistive strain sensing. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 177: 107285.
33.
SethyDMakireddiSVargheseS, et al.Piezoresistive behaviour of graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)/PMMA spray coated sensors on a polymer matrix composite beam. Express Polym Lett2019; 13: 1018.
34.
SanliABenchiroufAMüllerC, et al.Piezoresistive performance characterization of strain sensitive multi-walled carbon nanotube-epoxy nanocomposites. Sens Actuator A: Phys2017; 254: 61–68.
35.
NanniFMayoralBLMadauF, et al.Effect of MWCNT alignment on mechanical and self-monitoring properties of extruded PET-MWCNT nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1140–1146.
36.
KimYJChaJYHamH, et al.Preparation of piezoresistive nano smart hybrid material based on graphene. Curr Appl Phys2011; 11: S350–S352.
37.
LiWDichiaraABaiJ. Carbon nanotube-graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 74: 221–227.
38.
RuschauGRYoshikawaSNewnhamRE. Resistivities of conductive composites. J Appl Phys1992; 72: 953–959.
39.
LiCThostensonETChouT-W. Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube-based composites. Appl Phys Lett2007; 91: 91–94.
40.
SimmonsJG. Generalized formula for the electric tunnel effect between similar electrodes separated by a thin insulating film. J Appl Phys1963; 34: 1793–1803.
41.
ShiraishiMAtaM. Work function of carbon nanotubes. Carbon2001; 39: 1913–1917.
42.
KhomyakovPAGiovannettiGRusuPC, et al.First-principles study of the interaction and charge transfer between graphene and metals. Phys Rev B2009; 79: 1–12.
43.
ChouganMMarottaELamastraFR, et al.High performance cementitious nanocomposites: The effectiveness of nano-Graphite (nG). Constr Build Mater2020; 259: 119687.
44.
KimJASeongDGKangTJ, et al.Effects of surface modification on rheological and mechanical properties of CNT/epoxy composites. Carbon2006; 44: 1898–1905.
45.
PolychronopoulosNDVlachopoulosJ. Polymer processing and rheology. In: Jafar MazumderMASheardownHAl-AhmedA (eds) Functional biopolymers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 1–47.
46.
NadivRFernandesRMFOchbaumG, et al.Polymer nanocomposites: Insights on rheology, percolation and molecular mobility. Polymer2018; 153: 52–60.
47.
LinXZhangKLiK, et al.Dependence of rheological behaviors of polymeric composites on the morphological structure of carbonaceous nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135: 46416.
48.
LiBZhongW-H. Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 5595–5614.
49.
AllaouiAEl BouniaN. How carbon nanotubes affect the cure kinetics and glass transition temperature of their epoxy composites? - A review. Express Polym2009; 3: 588–594.
50.
HsuehC-H. Effects of aspect ratios of ellipsoidal inclusions on elastic stress transfer of ceramic composites. J Am Ceram Soc1989; 72: 344–347.
51.
FuS-YFengX-QLaukeB, et al.Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate – polymer composites. Compos Part B2008; 39: 933–961.
HwangS-HParkHWParkY-B, Piezoresistive behavior and multi-directional strain sensing ability of carbon nanotube-graphene nanoplatelet hybrid sheets. Smart Mater Struct2013; 22: 015013.
54.
DulSEccoLGPegorettiA, et al.Graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposites: Effect of compression molding and fused filament fabrication on properties. Polymers2020; 12: 101.
55.
ArbabM. Base layer effect on the d.c. conductivity and structure of direct current magnetron sputtered thin films of silver. Thin Solid Films2001; 381: 15–21.
56.
WichmannMHGBuschhornSTGehrmannJ, et al.Piezoresistive response of epoxy composites with carbon nanoparticles under tensile load. Phys Rev B2009; 80: 1–8.
57.
OskouyiABSundararajUMertinyP. Effect of temperature on electrical resistivity of carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets nanocomposites. J Nanotechnol Eng Med2014; 5: 1–6.
58.
EarpBPhillipsJGrbovicD, et al.Impact of current and temperature on extremely low loading epoxy-CNT conductive composites. Polymers2020; 12: 867–17.
59.
HeXJDuJHYingZ, et al.Positive temperature coefficient effect in multiwalled carbon nanotube/high-density polyethylene composites. Appl Phys Lett2005; 86: 1–3.
60.
SanliA. Investigation of temperature effect on the electrical properties of MWCNTs/epoxy nanocomposites by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Adv Compos Mater2020; 29: 31–41.
61.
LiQXueQZGaoXL, et al.Temperature dependence of the electrical properties of the carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Express Polym Lett2009; 3: 769–777.
62.
HanSChandAArabyS, et al.Thermally and electrically conductive multifunctional sensor based on epoxy/graphene composite. Nanotechnology2020; 31: 075702.
63.
MakireddiSVargheseFVBalasubramaniamK. Non-monotonic piezoresistive behaviour of graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)-polymer composite flexible films prepared by solvent casting. Express Polym Lett2017; 11: 581–588.
64.
AmjadiMYoonYJParkI. Ultra-stretchable and skin-mountable strain sensors using carbon nanotubes-Ecoflex nanocomposites. Nanotechnology2015; 26: 375501.
65.
Sánchez-RomateXFMoricheRJiménez-SuárezA, et al.Sensitive response of GNP/epoxy coatings as strain sensors: Analysis of tensile-compressive and reversible cyclic behavior, smart mater. Smart Mater Struct2020; 29: 065012.
66.
Sánchez-RomateXFArtigasJJiménez-SuárezA, et al.Critical parameters of carbon nanotube reinforced composites for structural health monitoring applications: Empirical results versus theoretical predictions, Compos Sci Technol2019; 171: 44–53.
67.
Xosé Fernández Sánchez-RomateX, Jiménez SuárezA and González ProlongoS. Smart coatings with carbon nanoparticles. Surf Sci2020; 1: 0–22, doi:10.5772/intechopen.92967.
