A numerical strategy, based on continuum damage mechanics and the failure envelope method, is proposed for failure prediction of composite multi-bolt joints. First, the design parameters of the failure envelope are determined by virtual tests of simple structures. Then, a modified failure envelope incorporating the bending effect is constructed. Finally, different bearing-to-bypass stress ratios and the influence of bolt rows on the bending effect are discussed. It is shown that the failure envelope with constant bearing-to-bypass stress ratio, obtained by assuming uniform bolt load distribution, is recommended. And the bending effect of single-lap, composite multi-bolt joints is alleviated by the introduction of more bolt rows. These results indicate that failure prediction of composite multi-bolt joints, using the proposed numerical strategy, exhibits excellent agreement with the experimental outcomes. This demonstrates that the numerical strategy is feasible.
YaoXFXuWYehHY. Dynamic caustic analysis of a propagating Mode-III crack in functionally graded material based on a higher-order transient crack tip expansion. J Reinf Plast Compos2006; 25: 1079–1089.
2.
DaiJJLiangXDYaoXF. Study of cracked unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites by digital speckle correlation method. J Reinf Plast Compos2005; 24: 1737–1746.
3.
LiJLiuXYYaoXF. A micromechanical debonding analysis of fiber-reinforced composites due to curing residual stress. J Reinf Plast Compos2015; 34: 962–971.
YaoXFBijlaardFSKKolsteinMH. Tensile strength and fracture behaviors of complex GFRP composites with a central hole. J Reinf Plast Compos2005; 39: 1247–1260.
6.
ZhangJYLiuFRZhaoLB. A progressive damage analysis based characteristic length method for multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Struct2014; 108: 915–923.
7.
XieMJ. Joints for composite materials, Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press, 2011.
8.
ZhaoLBQinTLZhangJY. Determination method of stress concentration relief factors for failure prediction of composite multi-bolt joints. J Compos Mater2015; 49: 1667–1680.
9.
Hart-smith LJ. Bolted joints in graphite composites. NASA CR-144899. Long Beach: Douglas Aircraft Company, 1976.
10.
CrewsJHNaikRA. Combined bearing and bypass loading on graphite/epoxy laminate. Compos Struct1986; 6: 21–40.
11.
CamanhoPPLambertM. A design methodology for mechanically fastened joints in laminated composite materials. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66: 3004–3020.
12.
IrisarriXLaurinFCarrereN. Progressive damage and failure of mechanically fastened joints in CFRP laminates-Part II: Failure prediction of an industrial junction. Compos Struct2012; 94: 2278–2284.
13.
LiuFRZhaoLBMehmoodS. A modified failure envelope method for failure prediction of multi-bolt composite joints. Compos Sci Technol2013; 83: 54–63.
14.
HeBLGeDYDuXZ. A continuum damage mechanics based strength prediction strategy for single-lap, composite bolted joint. Acta Mater Compos Sin2016; 33: 405–417–405–417.
15.
LapczykIHurtadoJA. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos Part A2007; 38: 2333–2341.
16.
FrizzellRMMcCarthyMAMcCarthyCT. Numerical method to control high levels of damage growth using an implicit finite element solver applied to notched cross-ply laminates. Compos Struct2014; 110: 51–61.
17.
ZhouYHYazdani-NezhadHMcCarthyMA. A study of intra-laminar damage in double-lap, multi-bolt, composite joints with variable clearance using continuum damage mechanics. Compos Struct2014; 116: 441–452.
18.
ZhaoLBQinTLZhangJY. 3D gradual material degradation model for progressive damage analyses of unidirectional composite materials. Math Prob Eng2015; 2015: 1–11.
19.
Yazdani-NezhadHMerwickFFrizzellRM. Numerical analysis of low-velocity rigid body impact response of composite panels. Int J Crash2015; 20: 27–43.
20.
EganBMcCarthyMAFrizzellRM. Modelling bearing failure in countersunk composite joints under quasi-static loading suing 3D explicit finite element analysis. Compos Struct2014; 108: 963–977.
21.
ZhouYHNezhadHYHouC. A three dimensional implicit finite element damage model and its application to single-lap multi-bolt composite joints with variable clearance. Compos Struct2015; 131: 1060–1072.
22.
DuvautGLionJL. Inequalities in mechanics and physics, Berlin: Springer, 1976.
GrayPOHigginsRMMcCarthyCT. Effect of thickness and laminate taper on the stiffness, strength and secondary bending of single-lap, single-bolt countersunk composite joints. Compos Struct2014; 107: 315–324.
25.
McCombsWFMcQueenJCPerryJL. Analytical design for aircraft structural joints. AD0831711, US Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, 1968.
26.
OlmedoASantiusteC. On the prediction of bolted single-lap composite joints. Compos Struct2012; 94: 2110–2117.
27.
ASTM D5961/D5961M-13. Standard test method for bearing response of polymer matrix composite laminates, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
28.
SchijveJCampoliGMonacoA. Fatigue of structures and secondary bending in structural elements. Int J Fatigue2009; 31: 1111–1123.
29.
NiuCY. Airframe stress analysis and sizing, Beijing: Aviation Press, 2009.
