Partly presented in Interdisciplinary Transport Phenomena VII, Dresden, Germany, 19–23 September 2011.
Compression moulding experiments of sheet moulding compound, visual observations of a vacuum test with prepregs and numerical models with two main approaches for computational fluid dynamics simulations of the mould filling phase are presented. One assumes that there are layers near the mould surfaces with much less viscosity and the other only use one viscosity model. The numerical experiments showed that the pressure could be accurately predicted with both approaches. The property necessary to predict correct pressure with altered mould closing velocities was that the bulk material had to obey shear-thinning effects. Preheating effects before compression were neglected, but altering the heating time until the prepreg was assumed to start flow had a significant effect. The experiments confirmed that the pressure is predominantly affected by the mould closing velocity. Regardless of the considered process settings, a first pressure top always appeared approximately at the logarithmic strain 0.25. A second top was associated with a slowdown of the press. The location of this was affected by the velocity and the vacuum, the latter indicating that vacuum assistance prevents a build-up of back pressure. Furthermore, heated prepreg above a critical temperature is observed to swell immediately as vacuum assistance is applied.
OldenboMMattssonDVarnaJ. Global stiffness of a SMC panel considering process induced fiber orientation. J Reinf Plast Compos2004; 23: 37–49.
2.
Sjögren A. An approach towards avoidance of pinholes and blowouts in painted SMC. In: Internationale AVK-TV, Tagung Baden, Baden, 2002.
3.
NaiduMSKamarajuV. High voltage engineering, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1996, pp. 378–378.
4.
OlssonNEJLundstromTSOlofssonK. Design of experiment study of compression moulding of SMC. Plast Rubber Compos2009; 38: 426–431.
5.
ComteEMerhiDMichaudV. Void formation and transport during SMC manufacturing: effect of the glass fiber sizing. Polym Compos2006; 27: 289–298.
6.
LundstromTSHolmgrenA. Dissolution of voids during compression moulding of SMC. J Reinf Plast Compos2009, pp. 1826–1837.
7.
OdenbergerPTAnderssonHMLundstromTS. Experimental flow-front visualisation in compression moulding of SMC. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 1125–1134.
8.
DumontTHOrgeasPJJLeL. X-ray phase contrast microtomography for the analysis of the fibrous microstructure of SMC composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2008; 39: 91–103.
9.
Yamada H, Mihata I, Tomiyama T, et al. Investigation of the fundamental causes of pinholes in SMC moldings. In: 47th annual conference, composites institute, the society of the plastics industry, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 1992.
10.
KimDKChoiHYKimN. Experimental investigation and numerical-simulation of Smc in compression molding. J Mater Process Technol1995; 49: 333–344.
11.
LeeLJMarkerLFGriffithRM. The rheology and mold flow of polyester sheet molding compound. Polym Compos1981; 2: 209–218.
12.
Le CorreSOrgeasLFavierD. Shear and compression behaviour of sheet moulding compounds. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 571–577.
13.
GibsonAGTollS. Mechanics of the squeeze flow of planar fibre suspensions. J Non-Newton Fluid Mech1999; 82: 1–24.
14.
KiaHG. In: KiaHG (ed.) Sheet molding compounds: Science and technology, Munich: Hanser, 1993, pp. 257–257.
15.
DumontPOrgeasLLe CorreS. Anisotropic viscous behavior of sheet molding compounds (SMC) during compression molding. Int J Plast2003; 19: 625–646.
16.
MarjavaaraBDEbermarkSLundstromTS. Compression moulding simulations of SMC using a multiobjective surrogate-based inverse modeling approach. Mech Compos Mater2009; 45: 503–514.