The liquid composite molding is a process of composite manufacturing, where all varieties involve compressive strain reinforcement before and during mold filling. A better understanding of the compressibility phenomenon helps to improve control of the implementation process of parts and tooling design. In this work, an experimental study of a series of compression tests was established in order to explain which effect influence the compression and relaxation phases during the manufacturing process, such as number of layers, compression speed, grammage, and jute layers orientations. A rheological approach was chosen to model the viscoelastic behaviour. The experimental results revealed that there are several molding parameters to take into account in manufacturing using liquid composite molding process, in the case of jute fibers. It was concluded that the Zener model is the optimal model to determine the compression and relaxation parameters.
KellyPAUmerRBickertonS. Viscoelastic response of dry and wet fibrous materials during infusion processes. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 868–873.
2.
ThomassetJCarreauaPJSanschagrinB. Rheological properties of long glass fiber filled polypropylene. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech2005; 125: 25–34.
3.
SekiY. Innovative multifunctional siloxane treatment of jute surface and its effect on the mechanical properties of jute/thermoset composites. Mater Sci and Engin A J2009; 508: 247–252.
4.
EssabirHElkhaoulaniABenmoussaK. Dynamic mechanical thermal behavior analysis of doum fibers reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater Design2013; 51: 780–788.
5.
ElkhaoulaniAArrakhizFZBenmoussaK. Mechanical and thermal properties of polymer composite based on natural fibers: Moroccan hemp fibers/polypropylene. Mater Design2013; 49: 203–208.
6.
ArrakhizFZMalhaMBouhfidR. Tensile, flexural and torsional properties of chemically treated alfa, coir and bagasse reinforced polypropylene. Compos B Engg2013; 47: 35–41.
7.
AbdellaouiHEchaabiJ. Rheological models for modeling the viscoelastic behaviour in liquid composite molding processes (LCM) review. J Reinf Plastics Compos2014; 33: 1–19.
8.
EchaabiJNzienguiMBHattabiM. Compressibility and relaxation models for fibrous reinforcements in liquid composites moulding. Int J Mater Form2008; 1: 851–854.
9.
BickertonSBuntainMJSomashekarAA. The viscoelastic compression behavior of liquid composite molding performs. Compos Part A2003; 34: 431–444.
10.
KellyPABickertonS. A comprehensive filling and tooling force analysis for rigid mould LCM processes. Compos Part A2009; 40: 1685–1697.
11.
GutowskiTGMorigakiTCaiZ. The consolidation of laminate composites. J Compos Mater1987; 21: 172–188.
12.
SaundersRALekakouCBaderMG. Compression and microstructure of fiber plain woven cloths in the processing of polymer composites. Compos Part A1998; 29: 443–454.
13.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing II: compaction and relaxation of dry and H2O-saturated woven reinforcements. Polym Compos1998; 19: 543–555.
14.
PearceNSummerscalesJ. The compressibility of a reinforcement fabric. Compos Manuf1995; 6: 15–21.
15.
Kim YR, McCarthy SP and Fanucci JP. Compressibility and relaxation of fiber reinforcements during composite processing. Polym Compos 1991; 12: 13–19.
16.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing I: review of experimental results. Polym Compos1998; 19: 198–216.
17.
SaundersRALlekakouCBbaderMG. Compression in processing of polymer composites 2. Modelling of the viscoelastic compression of resin impregnated fiber networks. Compos Sci Technol1999; 59: 1483–1494.
18.
LeonardYWaikamboMMartinP. Chemical Modification of Hemp, Sisal, Jute, and Kapok fibers by alkalization. J Appl Polym Sci2002; 84: 2222–2234.
19.
PenneruAPJayaramanKBhattacharryyaD. Viscoelastic behaviour of solid wood under compressive loading. Holzforschung2006; 60: 294–298.
20.
Glossaire des matériaux composites renforcé de fibres d’origine renouvelable. CARMA, 2006.
21.
ChenBChengAH-DChouT-W. A non linear compaction model for fibrous performs. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2000; 32: 701–707.
22.
GuptaAKellyPABickertonS. Simulating the effect of temperature elevation on clamping force requirements during rigid-tool liquid composite moulding processes. Compos Part A2012; 43: 2221–2229.
23.
Bickerton S and Abdullah MZ. Modeling and evaluation of the filling stage of injection/compression moulding. Comp Sci Techn 2003; 63: 1359--1375.
24.
Bickerton S, Kelly PA and Buntain MJ. Modelling the viscoleastic compression behavior of fibrous reinforcing fabrics. In: 34th conference ISTC, Baltimore, MD, 4--7 November 2002.
25.
Nziengui MB. Modélisation viscoélastique des renforts fibreux dans les procédés de type liquid composite moulding (LCM). Thesis’ Doctorat, Morocco, 2007.
26.
Cadinot S. Aspect rhéologique de la compressibilité d’un renfort fibreux pour matériaux composites : étude en compression et en relaxation. Thesis’s Doctorat, Havre, 2002.
27.
BréardJHenzelYTrochuF. Analysis of dynamic flows through porous media. Part II: deformation of a double –scale fibrous reinforcement. Polymer Compos2003; 24: 409–421.
28.
SomashekarAABickertonSBhattacharyyaD. Modelling the viscoelastic stress relaxation of glass fiber reinforcements under constant compaction strain during composites manufacturing. Compos Part A2012; 43: 1044–1052.
29.
AchesonJASimacekPAdvaniSG. The implication of fiber compaction and saturation on fully coupled VARTM simulation. Comp A Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 159–169.
30.
DelegliseMBinetruyCKrawczakP. Simulation of LCM processes involving induced or forced deformation. Comp Part A2006; 37: 874–880.
