An experimental setup was used to fairly compare mold filling times in vacuum infusion and resin transfer molding, and a 9.5% shorter mold filling time in vacuum infusion was observed than in resin transfer molding. The setup was also used to conduct compaction and permeability characterization experiments, and the results were used in a simplified vacuum infusion model, which is more straightforward to solve than the conventional full and coupled models in the literature. Simulated filling time in vacuum infusion was 31% shorter than in resin transfer molding. The faster resin flow in vacuum infusion is explained by the fact that the thickness in the wetted upstream region increases with time, and thus the effective permeability in that region increases.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC. Analysis of the vacuum infusion moulding process: I. Analytical formulation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2005; 36: 1645–1656.
3.
YenilmezBSenanMSozerEM. Variation of part thickness and compaction pressure in vacuum infusion process. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1710–1719.
4.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the Vacuum Infusion Process, A: Characterization experiments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2009; 40: 499–510.
5.
RobitailleFGauvinR. Compaction of textile reinforcements for composites manufacturing. I: review of experimental results. Polym Compos1998; 19: 198–216.
6.
YenilmezBSozerEM. Compaction of e-glass fabric preforms in the vacuum infusion process: (a) use of characterization database in a model and (b) experiments. J Compos Mater2012; 47: 1959–1975.
7.
CorreiaNCRobitailleFLongAC. Use of resin transfer molding simulation to predict flow, saturation, and compaction in the VARTM process. J Fluids Eng2004; 126: 210–210.
8.
HammamiAGebartBR. Analysis of the vacuum infusion molding process. Polym Compos2000; 21: 28–40.
9.
SimacekPAdvaniSG. Desirable features in mold filling simulations for Liquid Composite Molding processes. Polym Compos2004; 25: 355–367.
10.
AnderssonHMLundströmTSGebartBR. Numerical model for vacuum infusion manufacturing of polymer composites. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow2003; 13: 383–394.
11.
KangMKLeeWIHahnHT. Analysis of vacuum bag resin transfer molding process. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2001; 32: 1553–1560.
12.
LopatnikovSSimacekPGillespieJJr. A closed form solution to describe infusion of resin under vacuum in deformable fibrous porous media. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2004; 12: 191–204.
13.
MathurRHeiderDHoffmannC. Flow front measurements and model validation. Polym Compos2001; 22: 477–490.
14.
ChenRDongCLiangZ. Flow modeling and simulation for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process with the equivalent permeability method. Polym Compos2004; 25: 146–164.
15.
HsiaoK-TDevillardMAdvaniSG. Simulation based flow distribution network optimization for vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding process. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2004; 12: 175–190.
16.
SunXLiSLeeLJ. Mold filling analysis in vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding. Part I: SCRIMP based on a high-permeable medium. Polym Compos1998; 19: 807–817.
17.
CFX-4.3 Manual. Harwell, United Kingdom: AEA-Technology, 1999.
18.
WilliamsCDGroveSMSummerscalesJ. The compression response of fibre-reinforced plastic plates during manufacture by the resin infusion under flexible tooling method. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf1998; 29: 111–114.
19.
TackittKDWalshSM. Experimental study of thickness gradient formation in the VARTM process. Mater Manuf Process2005; 20: 607–627.
20.
TollS. Packing mechanics of fiber reinforcements. Polym Eng Sci1998; 38: 1337–1350.
21.
TollSMansonJAE. Elastic compression of a fiber network. J Appl Mech1995; 62: 223–236.
22.
ParnasRSFlynnKMDal-FaveroME. A permeability database for composites manufacturing. Polym Compos1997; 18: 623–633.
23.
MekicSBakkeB. Radial infusion models for permeability measurements of compressed fibrous beds. Int J Multiph Flow2013; 48: 1–10.
24.
NedanovPBAdvaniSG. A Method to determine 3D permeability of fibrous reinforcements. J Compos Mater2002; 36: 241–241.
25.
ArbterRBeraudJMBinetruyC. Experimental determination of the permeability of textiles: a benchmark exercise. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2011; 42: 1157–1168.
26.
AdvaniSGSozerEM. Process modeling in composites manufacturing, 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002.
27.
Bickerton S. Modeling and control of flow during impregnation of heterogeneous porous media, with application to composite mold filling processes. University of Delaware, 1999.
28.
AchesonJaSimacekPAdvaniSG. The implications of fiber compaction and saturation on fully coupled VARTM simulation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2004; 35: 159–169.
29.
VernetNRuizEAdvaniS. Experimental determination of the permeability of engineering textiles: Benchmark II. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 61: 172–184.
