Various silica grades differing in particle size (micro- versus nanosilica) and surface modification (untreated versus modified surface) have affected interfacial and mechanical properties of compression-molded polypropylene composites with 2, 4, 6, 8 vol% of added silica. Mechanical properties have been influenced primarily by combination of stiff fillers and tough polypropylene matrix and additionally by restructured matrix. Namely, silica particles with different surface properties have influenced nucleation and spherulite growth differently affecting thus tensile properties of the composites. All composites exhibited best tensile strength in silica content range 2–6 vol%.
WypychG. Handbook of fillers, 2nd ed. Toronto: ChemTec Publishing, 2000.
4.
KarianHGPreface. In: KarianHG (ed.). Handbook of polypropylene and polypropylene composites, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1999.
5.
Karger-KocsisJFakirovSPreface. In: Karger-KocsisJFakirovS (eds). Nano- and micromechanics of polymer blends and composites, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2009.
6.
BikiarisDNPapageorgiouGZPavlidouE. Preparation by melt mixing and characterization of isotactic polypropylene/SiO2 nanocomposites containing untreated and surface-treated nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 100: 2684–2696.
VassiliouABikiarisDNPavlidouE. Optimizing melt-processing conditions for the preparation of iPP/fumed silica nanocomposites: Morphology, mechanical and gas permeability properties. Macromol React Eng2007; 1: 488–501.
10.
ŠišakovaJPolymer materials and its properties. In: ErMJ (eds). New trends in technologies: Devices, computer, communication and industrial systems, Rijeka: InTech, 2010, pp. 15–42.
11.
PapanicolauGCBakosD. The influence of the adhesion bond between matrix and filler on the tensile strength of particulate-filled polymers. J Reinf Plast Compos1992; 2: 104–126.
12.
GaleskiARegnierGNano- and micromechanics of crystalline polymers. In: Karger-KocsisJFakirovS (eds). Nano- and micromechanics of polymer blends and composites, Munich: Carl Hanser Verlag, 2009.
13.
HuangLZhanRLuY. Mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of polypropylene/nano-SiO2 composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2006; 25: 1001–1012.
14.
ZamanHUHunPDKhanRA. Morphology, mechanical, and crystallization behaviors of micro- and nano-ZnO filled polypropylene composites. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 323–329.
15.
PustakAPucićIDenacM. Morphology of polypropylene/silica nano- and microcomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 128: 3099–3106.
16.
TurcsányiBPukánszkyBTudosF. Composition dependence of tensile yield stress in filled polymers. J Mater Sci Lett1988; 7: 160–162.
17.
van OssCJGieseRFLiZDetermination of contact angles and pore sizes of porous media by column and thin layer wicking. In: MittalKL (eds). Contact angle, wettability and adhesion, Utrecht: VSP, 1993, pp. 269–284.
18.
WuS. Polar and nonpolar interaction and nonpolar interaction in adhesion. J Adhes1973; 5: 39–55.
19.
DierkesW. Economic mixing of silica-rubber compounds. Interaction between the chemistry of the silica-silane reaction and the physics of mixing, PhD Thesis, University of Twente, 2005.
20.
WangKWuJSZengH. Radial growth rate of spherulites in polypropylene/barium sulfate composites. Eur Polym J2003; 39: 1647–1652.
21.
DerksenJJEskinD. Flow-induced forces in agglomerates. Fluid Dyn Mater Process2011; 7: 341–355.
22.
SiengchenSKarger-KocsisJ. Polystyrene nanocomposites produced by melt-compounding with polymer-coated magnesium carbonate nanoparticles. J Reinf Plast Compos2012; 31: 145–152.
23.
MoczoJPukanszkyB. Polymer micro and nanocomposites: Structure, interaction, properties. J Ind Eng Chem2008; 14: 535–563.
24.
WayJLAtkinsonJRNuttingJ. The effect of spherulite size on the fracture morphology of polypropylene. J Mater Sci1974; 9: 293–299.
25.
FriedrichK. Strength and fracture of crystalline isotactic polypropylene and the effect of molecular and morphological parameters. Prog Colloid Polym Sci1979; 66: 299–309.
26.
MartinsJACramezMCOliveiraMJ. Prediction of spherulite size in rotationally molded polypropylene. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys2003; 42: 367–385.
27.
BazhenovSMechanical behavior of filled thermoplastic polymers. In: CuppolettiJ (eds). Metal, ceramic and polymeric composites for various uses, Rijeka: InTech, 2011, pp. 171–195.
RaySSBandyopadhyayJBousminaM. Influence of degree of intercalation on the crystal growth kinetics of poly[(butylene succinate)-co-adipate] nanocomposites. Eur Polym J2008; 44: 3133–3145.
30.
OuederniMPhillipsPJ. Influence of morphology on the fracture, toughness of isotactic polypropylene. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed1995; 33: 1313–1322.
31.
ManiasEPolizosGNakajimaHFundamentals of polymer nanocomposite technology. In: MorganABWilkieCA (eds). Flame retardant polymer nanocomposites, Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience, 2007, pp. 31–66.
32.
MittalKL. The role of the interface in adhesion phenomena. Polym Eng Sci1977; 17: 467–673.
