Present work intends to study the improvement of impact performance on sandwich composites by the addition of nanoclays. For this purpose, nanoclays Cloisite 30B were previously subjected to a silane treatment in order to improve their dispersion and interface adhesion. Different incident impact energy levels were used and, for both sandwiches, the maximum load, displacement or elastic recuperation shows to be very dependent of the impact energy. Mathematical relationships are proposed to estimate the maximum impact force and displacement, based on the total impact energy and impact bending stiffness. Finally, sandwiches enhanced by nanoclays presented higher maximum impact loads, lower displacements, the best performance in terms of elastic recuperation and maximum residual flexural strength.
AtasCSevimC. On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam. Compos Struct2010; 93: 40–48.
2.
VuralMRavichandranG. Dynamic response and energy dissipation characteristics of balsa wood: experiment and analysis. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 2147–2170.
3.
SilvaAKyriakidesS. Compressive response and failure of balsa wood. Int J Solids Struct2007; 44: 8685–8717.
4.
AbrateS. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev1997; 50: 69–82.
5.
AsiO. An experimental study on the bearing strength behavior of Al2O3 particle filled glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites pinned joints. Compos Struct2010; 92: 354–363.
6.
KomarneniS. Nanocomposites. J Mater Chem1992; 2: 1219–1230.
7.
LingGHeJ. The influence of nano-Al2O3 additive on the adhesion between enamel and steel substrate. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct2004; 379: 432–436.
8.
KeYLongCQiZ. Crystallization, properties, and crystal and nanoscale morphology of PET-clay nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci1999; 71: 1139–1146.
9.
SongMHourstonDJYaoKJ. High performance nanocomposites of polyurethane elastomer and organically modified layered silicate. J Appl Polym Sci2003; 90: 3239–3243.
LiuWHoaSVPughM. Fracture toughness and water uptake of high-performance epoxy/nanoclay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 2364–2373.
12.
HoM-WLamC-KLauK-T. Mechanical properties of epoxy-based composites using nanoclays. Compos Struct2006; 75: 415–421.
13.
FarukOMatuanaLM. Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood-plastic composites. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 2073–2077.
14.
FerreiraJAMReisPNBCostaJDM. A study of the mechanical properties on polypropylene enhanced by surface treated nanoclays. Compos Part B-Eng2011; 42: 1366–1372.
15.
FerreiraJAMReisPNBCostaJDM. A study of the mechanical behaviour on injection moulded nanoclay enhanced polypropylene composites. J Thermoplast Compos2011. DOI: 10.1177/0892705711428658.
16.
FerreiraJAMReisPNBCostaJDM. Fatigue behavior of Kevlar composites with nanoclay filled epoxy resin. J Compos Mater2012DOI: 10.1177/0021998312452024.
17.
HosurMVChowdhuryFJeelaniS. Low-velocity impact response and ultrasonic NDE of woven carbon/epoxy–nanoclay nanocomposites. J Compos Mater2007; 41: 2195–2212.
18.
IqbalKKhanS-UMunirA. Impact damage resistance of CFRP with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 1949–1957.
19.
AvilaAFSoaresMINetoAS. A study on nanostructured laminated plates behavior under low-velocity impact loadings. Int J Impact Eng2007; 34: 28–41.
20.
ReisPNBFerreiraJAMSantosP. Impact response of Kevlar composites with filled epoxy matrix. Compos Struct2012; 94: 3520–3528.
21.
ReisPNBFerreiraJAMZhangZY. Impact response of Kevlar composites with nanoclay enhanced epoxy matrix. Compos Part B-Eng2013; 46: 7–14.
22.
HosurMVMohammedAAZainuddinS. Impact performance of nanophased foam core sandwich composites. Mater Sci Eng A2008; 498: 100–109.
23.
HosurMVMohammedAAZainuddinS. Processing of nanoclay filled sandwich composites and their response to low velocity impact loading. Compos Struct2008; 82: 101–116.
FoundMSHowardLC. Single and multiple impact behaviour of a CFRP laminate. Compos Struct1993; 32: 159–163.
34.
David-WestOSNashDHBanksWM. An experimental study of the damage accumulation in balanced CFRP laminates due to repeated impact. Compos Struct2008; 83: 247–258.
35.
RíoTGZaeraRBarberoE. Damage in CFRPs due to low velocity impact at low temperature. Compos Part B-Eng2005; 36: 41–50.
