Experimental and numerical characterizations of sandwich materials are required to fully exploit the benefits offered by these materials and efficiently design them. In this study, the flexural behavior of resin-infused composite sandwich structures was investigated. Panels with two different polyvinylchloride foam densities and thicknesses were studied. The S-2 glass fabric face sheets were resin-infused and bonded to the core in a single-step process using epoxy resin. Sandwich beams machined from the panels were subjected to three- and four-point bending tests. Finite element-based simulations predicting the flexural response of the sandwich panels were performed and compared with experiments. Excellent agreement in finite element-predicted failure loads and experiments were observed.
KabirMESahaMCJeelaniS. Tensile and fracture behavior of polymer foams. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 429: 225–235.
2.
SharmaS. Process development issues of glass-carbon hybrid-reinforced polymer composite wind turbine blades. J Compos Mater2010; 44(4): 437–456.
3.
WilliamsCJuskaTDuerCCaiazzoA. Progress in materials for marine composite structures. Proceedings of the International SAMPE Technical Conference, SAMPE, Long Beach, CA, 16–20May2004, 1845–1853.
4.
GatesTSOdegardGMFranklandSJVClancyTC. Computational materials: multiscale modeling and simulation of nanostructured materials. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 2416–2434.
5.
KabirMESahaMCJeelaniS. Tensile and fracture behavior of polymer foams. Mater Sci Eng A2006; 429: 225–235.
6.
VaikhanskiLNuttSR. Fiber-reinforced composite foam from expandable PVC microspheres. Composites Part A2003; 34: 1245–1253.
7.
MouritzAPThomsonRS. Compression, flexure and shear properties of a sandwich composite containing defects. Compos Struct1999; 44: 263–278.
8.
BorsellinoCCalabreseLValenzaA. Experimental and numerical evaluation of sandwich composite structures. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 1709–1715.
9.
BurmanMZenkertD. Fatigue of foam core sandwich beams – 2: effect of initial damage. Int J Fatigue1997; 19(7): 563–578.
10.
CoriglianoARizziEPapaE. Experimental characterization and numerical simulations of a syntactic-foam/glass-fibre composite sandwich. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 2169–2180.
11.
FamASharafT. Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations. Compos Struct2010; 92: 2927–2935.
12.
KannyKMahfuzHCarlssonLAThomasTJeelaniS. Dynamic mechanical analyses and flexural fatigue of PVC foams. Compos Struct2002; 58: 175–183.
13.
MarasavinaLSadowskiTKnecMNegruR. Non-linear behaviour of foams under static and impact three point bending. Int J Non Linear Mech2010; 45(10): 969–975.
14.
MajumdaraPSrinivasaguptaDMahfuzaHJosephBThomasMMChristensenS. Effect of processing conditions and material properties on the debond fracture toughness of foam-core sandwich composites: experimental optimization. Composites Part A2003; 34: 1097–1104.
15.
YenKSRatnamMMAkilHM. Measurement of flexural modulus of polymeric foam with improved accuracy using moire method. Polym Test2010; 29: 358–368.
16.
RussoAZuccarelloB. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels. Compos Struct2007; 81: 575–586.
17.
ShahdinAMezeixLBouvetCMorlierJGourinatY. Fabrication and mechanical testing of glass fiber entangled sandwich beams: a comparison with honeycomb and foam sandwich beams. Compos Struct2009; 90: 404–412.
18.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular solids structure and properties1988; Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19.
SteevesCAFleckNA. Collapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending. Part II: experimental investigation and numerical modelling. Int J Mech Sci2004; 46: 585–608.
20.
TagarielliVLFleckNADeshpandeVS. Collapse of clamped and simply supported composite sandwich beams in three-point bending. Composites Part B2004; 35: 523–534.
21.
El MahiAFarooqMKSahraouiSBezaziA. Modelling the flexural behaviour of sandwich composite materials under cyclic fatigue. Mater Des2004; 25: 199–208.
BezaziAEl MahiABerthelotJMBezzaziB. Experimental analysis of behavior and damage of sandwich composite materials in three point bending. Part 2. Fatigue test results and damage mechanisms. Strength Mater2009; 41(3): 257–267.
24.
KulkarniNMahfuzHJeelaniS. Fatigue failure mechanism and crack growth in foam core sandwich composites under flexural loading. J Reinf Plast Compos2004; 23(1): 83–94.
25.
DIAB®. Divinycell H techincal data. DIAB, Sweden, 2010.
26.
ASTM C-393. Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
27.
ASTM D-7249. Standard test method for facing properties of sandwich constructions by long beam flexure. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
28.
ASTM D-7250. Standard practice for determining sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
29.
Micross®. e-Xstream engineering SA. Version 1.1.2, Micross, Belgium, 2010.
30.
Digimat®. e-Xstream engineering SA. Version 4.0.2, Digimat, Belgium, 2010.
31.
DekaLJBartusSDVaidyaUK. Numerical modeling of simultaneous and sequential multi-site impact response of S-2 glass/epoxy composite laminates. Proceedings of Composites and Polycon, American Composites Manufacturers Association, Tampa, FL, 17–19October2007, 1–7.
32.
FeldhusenJTorsakulSBrezingANKrishnamoorthySK. An approach to numerical modeling and simulation of cellular foam sandwich structures in commercial FE-Softwares. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM, Singapore, 8–11December2008, 836–841.
