In this article, a minimum weight design of carbon/epoxy laminates is carried out using genetic algorithms. New failure envelopes have been developed by the combination of two commonly used phenomenological failure criteria, namely Maximum Stress (MS) and Tsai—Wu (TW) are used to obtain the minimum weight of the laminate. These failure envelopes are the most conservative failure envelope (MCFE) and the least conservative failure envelope (LCFE). Uniaxial and biaxial loading conditions are considered for the study and the differences in the optimal weight of the laminate are compared for the MCFE and LCFE. The MCFE can be used for design of critical load-carrying composites, while the LCFE could be used for the design of composite structures where weight reduction is much more important than safety such as unmanned air vehicles.
Gurdal Z., Haftka RT and Hajela P.Design and optimization of laminated composite materials. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1999.
2.
Echaabi J., Trochu F. and Gauvin R.Review of failure criteria of fibrous composite materials. Polym Compos1996; 17(6): 786-796.
3.
Nahas MNSurvey of failure and post-failure theories of laminated fiber-reinforced composites. J Compos Technol Res1986; 8(4): 138-153.
4.
Hinton MJ and Soden PDPredicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise . Compos Sci Technol1998; 58(7): 1001-1010.
5.
Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS and Soden PDEvaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part C’ of the exercise. Compos Sci Technol2004; 64: 321-327.
6.
Zhu H., Sankar BV and Marrey RVEvaluation of failure criteria for fiber composites using finite element micro-mechanics . J Compos Mater1998; 32(8): 766-782.
7.
Satheesh R., Naik GN and Ganguli R.Conservative design optimization of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and multiple failure criteria. J Compos Mater2010; 44(3): 369-387.
8.
Nam HW, Hwang W. and Han KSStacking sequence design of fiber-metal laminate for maximum strength. J Compos Mater2001; 35(18): 1654-1683.
9.
Kim JS, Kim CG and Hong CSKnowledge-based expert system for optimal stacking sequence of composite structures . J Compos Mater1999; 33(13): 1244-1274.
10.
Le Riche R. and Haftka RTOptimization of laminate stacking sequence for buckling load maximization using genetic algorithm. AIAA J1993; 31(5): 951-956.
11.
Singha MK, Ramachandra LS and Bandyopadhyay JNOptimum design of laminated composite plates for maximum thermal buckling loads. J Compos Mater2000; 34(23): 1982-1997.
12.
Kim SH and Kim CGOptimal design of composite stiffened panel with cohesive elements using micro-genetic algorithm. J Compos Mater2008; 42(21): 2259-2273.
13.
Kang JH and Kim CGMinimum-weight design of compressively loaded composite plates and stiffened panels for postbuckling strength by genetic algorithm. Compos Struct2005; 69: 239-246.
14.
Murugan MS and Ganguli R.Aeroelastic stability enhancement and vibration suppression in a composite helicopter rotor. J Aircraft2005; 42(4): 1013-1024.
15.
Pawar PM and Ganguli R.On the effect of progressive damage on composite helicopter rotor system behavior . Compos Struct2007; 78(3): 410-423.
16.
Pawar PM and Ganguli R.Modelling progressive damage accumulation in thin walled composite beams for rotor blade applications. Compos Sci Technol2006; 66(13): 2237-2249.
17.
Kogiso N., Watson LT, Gurdal Z. and Haftka RTGenetic algorithm with local improvements for composite laminate design. Struct Multi Optim1994; 7(4): 207-218.
18.
Venkataraman S. and Haftka RTOptimization of composite panel - a review . In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society of Composites, Dayton, OH, 1999, pp.479-488.
19.
Tsai SW and Hahn HTIntroduction to composite materials. Connecticut: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc, 1980.
20.
Jones RMMechanics of composite materials, 2nd ed. New York: Brunner-Routledge, 1999 .
21.
Narayana Naik G., Gopalakrishnan S. and Ganguli R.Design optimization of composites using genetic algorithm and failure mechanism based failure criterion. Compos Struct2008; 83: 354-367.
22.
Rao SSEngineering optimization - theory and practice, Revised, 3rd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, 2008.
23.
Goldberg DEGenetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. 2nd Impression . New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia, India, 2007.
24.
Narayana Naik G., Krishna Murty AV and Gopalakrishnan S.A failure mechanism based failure theory for laminated composites including the effect of shear stress . Compos Struct2005; 69: 219-227.
25.
Krishna Murty AV, Narayana Naik G. and Gopalakrishnan S.Towards a rational failure criterion for unidirectional composite laminae. Mech Adv Mater Struct2005; 12(2): 147-157.
