Use of reinforced rigid polyurethane foam for blast hazard mitigation

Abstract

This article presents the development of a cost-effective lightweight protection technique for explosives transporting container and storage facilities employing surface-mounted Rigid Polyurethane Foam (RPF) plates. Different RPF specimens were prepared with different densities and sand particle reinforcement ratios ranging between 0% (unreinforced) and 30%. Mechanical properties characterization was conducted to optimize an RPF formulation to be tested under blast loading using different experimental techniques. Explosive scaling laws were utilized to relate indoor blast test results (performed with small explosive charges) to real-life blast scenarios. Small RDX explosive charges were placed and detonated inside RPF specimens to correlate the size of the resulting cavity to the explosive charge weight and the RPF density. Another set of experiments were conducted to evaluate the maximum deformation depth of lead witness plates resulting from blast waves. In these latter experiments, explosive charges were mounted on the free surface of RPF plates. In general, test results demonstrated the capability of reinforced RPF as a light weight cost-effective technique to mitigate blast load hazard.

Keywords

Blast loads composite reinforcement hazard mitigation rigid polyurethane foam

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Elliot CL , Mays GC and Smith PD The protection of buildings against terrorism and disorder, In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 1992, 94, pp.287-297.

Millington G. Discussion of ‘The protection of buildings against terrorism and disorder’ by Elliot CL, Mays GC and Smith PD, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, 1994, 104, pp.343- 350.

Committee on feasibility of applying blast-mitigating technologies and design methodologies from military facilities to civilian buildings. Protecting buildings from bomb damage. Washington : National Academy Press, 1995.

Moreton PA , Lang GL and Sexstone PA The explosives incidents database advisory Service_EIDAS, Minutes of the twenty-seventh explosives safety seminar, US Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board, Louisiana, TN, 1996 .

Estc. Manual of standards for the storage and transport of military explosives, ESTC Leaflet No. 5, Explosives Storage and Transport Committee, ESTC, Ministry of Defence, Abbeywood, Bristol, UK, 1996.

Osteraas JD Murrah building bombing revisited: A qualitative assessment of blast damage and collapse patterns. ASCE Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 2006; 20: 330-335.

Baker WE , Cox PA , Westine PS , Kulesz JJ and Strehlow RA Explosion hazards and evaluation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1983.

Rougier VC and Luccioni BM Numerical assessment of FRP retrofitting systems for reinforced concrete elements . Eng Struct 2007; 29: 1664-1675.

Sheikh SA and Li Y. Design of FRP confinement for square concrete columns. Eng Struct 2007; 29: 1074-1083.

10.

Clark CJ and Bennett EM Method for explosive blast control using expanded foam, US Patent 4,589,341-May, 20, 1986.

11.

Johnson DR and Fischer SH TNT Equivalence of energetic materials, Sandia national laboratories explosive components facility OP-905-0009, (Issue B, Appendix A), 1990 , p.7.

12.

Cooper PW and Kurowski SR Scaling blast cavity diameters in rigid foam, Sandia Laboratories Memo of October 6, 1975.

13.

Woodfin RL Rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) technology for countermines (Sea) program, Phase I, Sandia Report, SAND 96-2841, January, 1997.

14.

Woodfin RL , Faucett DL , Hance BG , Latham AE and Schmidt CO Rigid polyurethane foam (RPF) technology for countermines (sea) program, Phase II, Sandia Report, SAND 98-2278, October 1998.

15.

Alba A. , Maruyama X. , Woodfin R. , Schmidt C. and Mason G. The use of rigid polyurethane foam as a land-mine breaching technique, In: Proceedings of the Energetic Materials Research and Test Center, October 1998, Institute of Mining and Technology, New Mexico.

16.

Hopkinson B. British ordnance board minutes, 13565, British Ordnance Office, London, UK, 1915.

17.

Cranz C. Lehrbuch der Ballistik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1926.

18.

Gibson LJ and Ashby MF Cellular solids, structure and properties. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1988.

19.

Gibson U. , Ashby MF , Zhang J. and Triantafillou TC Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads-1. Modelling . Int J Mech Sci 1989; 31: 635-663.

20.

Gum W. , Riese W. and Ulrich H. Reaction polymers. New York: Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-520933-8, 1992.

21.

Harrington R. and Hock K. Flexible polyurethane foams. Midland: The Dow Chemical Company, 1991.

22.

Oertel G. Polyurethane handbook. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., ISBN 0-02-948920-2, 1985 .

23.

Ulrich H. Chemistry and technology of isocyanates. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ISBN 0-471-96371-2, 1996.

24.

Widdle Jr, RD Measurement and modeling of the mechanical properties of polyurethane foam , PhD Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, 2005.

25.

Gel’fand BE , Gubin SA , Kogarko SM and Popov OE Investigation of the special characteristics of the propagation and reflection of pressure waves in a porous medium. J Appl Mech Tech Phys 1975; 16: 897-900.

26.

Ben-Dor G. , Igra O. , Mazor G. , Onodera H. and Takayama K. Head on collision of shock waves with porous materials: Experimental and Numerical Investigation. In: Brun R and Dumitrescu LZ (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Marseille, Vol. III, pp. 215-220, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1995.