Experimental Studies on the High Strain Rate Compression Response of Woven Graphite/Epoxy Composites at Room and Elevated Temperatures

Abstract

In this study, experimental investigations on affordable woven graphite/epoxy laminates under high strain rate compression loading at room and elevated temperatures are discussed. 17-layered woven graphite/epoxy laminates are fabricated with plain and satin weave fabrics with room temperature curing SC-15 epoxy resin using affordable vacuum assisted resin infusion molding (VARIM) process. Samples were tested at strain rates ranging from 200 to 1100/s at four different temperatures: room, 125, 175, and 225 F. Upper limit on the temperature was selected based on the supplier’s data sheet for SC-15 epoxy resin system, which has a dry glass transition temperature of 220 F. Failure mechanisms were characterized through optical microscopy. Failure modes were influenced by the temperature and fabric architecture. Results of the study indicate the softening of fiber–matrix interface with increasing temperature, which affects the dynamic compression strength. Satin weave samples exhibit higher compressive strength as compared to plain weave samples due to straighter fabric architecture.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Sierakowski, R. L. (1997). Applied Mechanics Reviews, 50(11): Part 1. 741–761 .

2. El-Habak, A. M. A. (1993). Journal of Composite Technology and Research, JCTRER, 15(4): 311–317 .

3. Montréal, D. M. and Williams, C. J. (1992). A Method for Evaluating the High Strain Rate Compressive Properties of Composite Materials. In: Grimes, G. C. (ed.), Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Tenth Volume) ASTM STP 1120, pp. 54–65, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia .

4. Harding, J. (1993). Composites, 2: 323–332

5. Powers, B. M., Vinson, J. R., Wardle, M. and Scott, B. (1995). High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal, and Ceramic Matrix Composites and Other Advanced Materials , In: Proceedings of the ASME Aerospace Division Board, AD-48, pp. 179–189 .

6. Powers, B. M. and Vinson, J. R. (1996). In: Allen, H. G. (ed.), Sandwich Construction, 3rd Edn., pp. 769–778, Engineering Materials Advisory Services, Ltd., England .

7. Woldenbet, E. and Vinson, J. R. (1997). In: Proceedings of 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC., Struc. Dyn. and Matl. Conference, 2: 927–934 .

8. Waas, A. M., Takeda, N., Yuan, J. and Lee, S. H. (1997). Proceedings 12th Annual Technical American Society for Composites Conference, Dearborn, pp. 552–561 .

9. Hsiao, H. M., Daniel. I. M. and Cordes, R. D. (1999). Journal of Composite Materials, 33: 1620–1642 .

10.

10. Hosur, M. V., Vaidya, U. K., Abraham, A., Jadhav, N. and Jeelani, S. (1999). ASME Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 4: 468–475 .

11.

11. Vaidya, U. K., Jadhav, N. C., Hosur, M. V., Gillespie, Jr. J. W. and Fink, B.K. (1999). In: Proceedings of American Society for Composites 14th Technical Conference, Fairborn, pp. 141–151 .

12.

12. Weeks, C. A. and Sun, C.T. (1998). Composites Science and Technology. 58: 603–611 .

13.

13. Ninan, L.and Sun, C. T. (1998). In: Proceedings of American Society for Composites 13th Technical Conference, Baltimore, pp. 1732–1745 .

14.

14. Dee, A. T., Vinson, J. R. and Sankar, B. V. (1997). In: Proceedings of AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 38th SDM Conference, Orlando, pp. 945–954 .

15.

15. Yaniv, G. and Daniel, I. M. (1991). Report No. NASA – CR – 189082.

16.

16. Takeda, N. and Wan, L. (1995). High Strain Rate Effects on Polymer, Metal and Ceramic Matrix Composites and other Advanced Materials , In: Proceedings of the ASME Aerospace Division Board., AD-48, pp. 109–113 .

17.

17. Hosur, M.V., Adya, M., Alexander, J., Vaidya, U.K., Jeelani, S. and Mayer, A. (1996). Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, (in print).

18.

18. Li, Z. and Lambros, J. Composite Science and Technology, 59: 1097–1107 .