To determine how environment affects the bond behavior of FRP reinforcement for concrete, FRP rods were subjected to accelerated environmental pre-conditioning and several mechanical tests. Specially-made smooth and lugged FRP rods consisting of glass/vinylester, carbon/vinylester, and carbon/epoxy composites were evaluated. The primary means of comparison of the pre-conditioned materials was the direct pull-out test, although pertinent properties of rods such as short-beam apparent shear strength and longitudinal modulus of elasticity were also evaluated. The results reveal that pre-conditioning of FRP rods prior to casting degrades the FRP material itself, but does not necessarily degrade the bond behavior. In particular, the smooth rods, which had low bond strength to begin with, had little change in bond strength. On the other hand, the lugged rods, which were made susceptible to the environment by the machining of lugs, had significantly reduced bond strength due to degradation of the resin or the fiber/resin interface. Of the three types of aqueous environments evaluated, high temperature combined with an alkaline solution is the most aggressive to the FRP materials evaluated. Certain experiments highlighted the importance of the resin rich surface on environmental resistance.
Al-DulaijanS. U., NanniA., Al-ZahraniM. M., BakisC. E., and BoothbyT. E., (1996), “Bond Evaluation of Environmentally Conditioned GFRP/Concrete Systems,”Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, El-BadryM.M., Ed., Canadian Soc. for Civil Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, pp. 845–852.
2.
Al-DulaijanS. U., (1996), “Effect of Environmental and Mechanical Conditioning on Bond between FRP Reinforcement and Concrete,” Doctoral Thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, December, 1996.
3.
Al-ZahraniM. M., (1995), “Bond Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Reinforcements with Concrete,” Doctoral Thesis in Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, December, 1995.
4.
ASTM D4475, (1990), “Standard Test Method for Apparent Horizontal Shear Strength of Pultruded Reinforced Plastic Rods by the Short Beam Method,”Annual Book of Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohoken, PA.
5.
ASTM C1198, (1991), “Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio for Advanced Ceramics by Sonic Resonance,” Annual Book of Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohoken, PA.
6.
BakisC. E., FreimanisA. J., GremelD., and NanniA., (1998), “Effect of Resin Material on Bond and Tensile Properties of Unconditioned and Conditioned FRP Reinforcement Rods,” First Intl. Conf. on Durability of Composites for Construction, B. Benmokrane, and H. Rahman, Eds., Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, pp. 525–535.
7.
BankL. C., GentryT. R., and BarkattA., (1995), “Accelerated Test Methods to Determine the Long-Term Behavior of FRP Composite Structures: Environmental Effects,”J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol. 14, pp. 559–587.
8.
BankL. C., and PutermanM., (1997), “Microscopic Study of Surface Degradation of Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Rods Embedded in Concrete Castings Subjected to Environmental Conditioning,”High Temperature and Environmental Effects on Polymeric Composites: 2nd Vol., ASTM STP 1302, GatesT. S., and ZureickA.-H., Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 191–205.
9.
ChateauminoisA., ChabertB., SourierJ. P., and VincentL., (1993), “Hygrothermal Aging Effects on the Static Fatigue of Glass/Epoxy Composites,”Composites, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 547–555.
10.
CollinsT. A., HarveyR. J., and DalzielA.W., (1993), “Use of Elevated Temperature in the Structural Testing of FRP Components for Simulating the Effects of Hot and Wet Environmental Exposure,”Composites, Vol. 24, No. 8, pp. 625–634.
11.
CiriscioliP. R., LeeW. I., PetersonD. G., SpringerG. S., and TangJ. M., (1988), “Accelerated Environmental Testing of Composites,”Environmental Effects on Composite Materials, Vol. 3, SpringerG. S., Ed., Technomic, Lancaster, PA, pp. 35–50.
12.
DiefendorfR. J., (1987), “Carbon/Graphite Fibers,”Engineered Materials Handbook, Vol. 1, Composites, ASTM Intl., Metals Park, OH, pp. 49–53.
13.
DoremusR. H., (1994), Glass Science, John Wiley, New York.
14.
DolanC. W., LeuB. L., and HundleyA., (1997), “Creep-Rupture of Fiber-Reinforced-Plastics in a Concrete Environment,”Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-3, Vol. 2, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo, pp. 187–194.
15.
GangaRaoH. V. S., and VijayP. V., (1997), “Aging of Structural Composites under Varying Environmental Conditions,”Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-3, Vol. 2, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo, pp. 91–98.
16.
GentryT. R., BankL. C., BarkattA., and PrianL., (1998), “Accelerated Test Methods to Determine the Long-Term Behavior of Composite Highway Structures Subject to Environmental Loading,”J. Composites Technology & Research, Vol. 20, pp. 38–50.
17.
GerritseA., (1992), “Durability Criteria for Non-Metallic Tendons in an Alkaline Environment,”Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, NealeK. W., and LabossiereP., Eds., Canadian Society for Civil Engineering, Montreal, Quebec, pp. 129–138.
18.
LorenzE. A., (1993), “Accelerated Aging of Fiber Composite Bars and Dowels,” M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, pp. 1–161.
19.
LitherlandK. L., OakleyD. R., and ProctorB. A., (1981), “The Use of Accelerating Aging Procedures to Predict the Long Term Strength of GRC Composites,”Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 455–466.
20.
PorterM. L., and BarnesB. A., (1998), “Accelerated Aging Degradation of Glass Fiber Composites,”2nd Intl. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure, Vol. 2, SaadatmaneshH., and EhsaniM.R., Eds., Univ. Arizona, Tucson, pp. 446–459.
21.
PorterM. L., MehusJ., YoungK. A., O'NeilE. F., and BarnesB. A., (1997), “Aging for Fiber Reinforcement in Concrete,”Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-3, Vol. 2, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo, pp. 59–66.
22.
ProctorB.A., OakleyD. R., and LitherlandK. L., (1982), “Developments in the Assessment and Performance of GRC over 10 Years,”Composites, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 173–179.
23.
RiffleJ. S., LeskoJ. J., and PuckettP. M. (1998), “Chemistry of Polymer Matrix Resins for Infrastructure,”2nd International Conference on Composites in Infrastructure, Vol. 1, SaadatmaneshH., and EhsaniM. R., Eds., University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, pp. 23–34.
24.
SchultheiszC. R., SchutteC. L., McDonoughW. G., MacturkK. S., McAuliffeM., KondaguntaS., and HunstonD. L., (1996), “Effect of Temperature and Fiber Coating on the Strength of E-Glass Fibers and the E-Glass/Epoxy Interface for Single Fiber Fragmentation Samples Immersed in Water,”Fiber, Matrix, and Interface Properties, ASTM STP 1290, SpraggC. J., and DrzalL. T., Eds., American Soc. Testing and Materials, West Conshohoken, PA, pp. 103–131.
25.
SenR., ShahawyM., SukumarS., and RosasJ., (1998), “Effect of Tidal Exposure on Bond of CFRP Rods,”2nd Intl. Conf. on Composites in Infrastructure, Vol. 2, SaadatmaneshH., and EhsaniM.R., Eds., Univ. Arizona, Tucson, pp. 512–523.
26.
TakewakaK., and KhinM., (1996), “Deterioration of Stress-Rupture of FRP Rods in Alkaline Solution Simulating as Concrete Environment,”Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, El-BadryM.M., Ed., Canadian Soc. for Civil Engrg., Montreal, Quebec, pp. 649–664.
27.
TannousF. E., and SaadatmaneshH., (1999), “Durability of AR Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Bars,”Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 12–19.
28.
WolffE. G., (1993), “Moisture Effects on Polymer Matrix Composites,”SAMPE Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 11–19.
29.
YamaguchiT., YoshitakaK., NishimuraT., and UomotoT., (1997), “Creep Rupture of FRP Rods Made of Aramid, Carbon and Glass Fibers,”Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, FRPRCS-3, Vol. 2, Japan Concrete Institute, Tokyo, pp. 179–186.
