Effect of Absorption in Aqueous and Hygrothermal Media on the Compressive Properties of Glass Fiber Reinforced Syntactic Foam

Abstract

Absorption due to immersion in aqueous media consisting of either saline or seawater or due to exposure to water vapor conditions and the attendant effect on the compressive properties of syntactic foam reinforced with E-glass fibers in the form of chopped strands were studied. Whereas the compressive strength decreased in samples exposed to water vapor, the saline or seawater immersed samples showed increase when compared to the dry sample. The decrease in strength in the vapor-exposed case is ascribed to higher absorption of water and to debonding and damaged features for interfaces. The enhancement of strength values for the samples immersed in saltish media is traced to the larger size of the chloride ion and resultant changes in the stress state around the fiber-bearing regions. Recourse to an analysis of scanning electron microscopic pictures of the compression-failed samples is taken to explain the observed trends.

Keywords

syntactic foam aqueous media glass microballoon glass fiber compressive strength

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Malloy, R. A. and Hudson, J. A. , International Encyclopedia of Composites, 1990, Vol. 1, S. M. Lee . Ed., VCH Publishers, New York, p. 257-257.

2. Puterman, M. , Narkis, M. and Kenig, S. , J. Cell. Plast. 1980, 16, p. 223-223.

3. Okuno, K. and Woodhams, R. T. J. Cell. Plast. 1974, 10, p. 237-237.

4. Morehouse, D. S. and Wakters, H. A. , SPE Journal, 1969, 25, May, p. 43-43.

5. Benning, C. J. , Plastic Foams, John Wiley, New York, 1969, Vol. 1, p. 537-537.

6. Ferguson, O. L. and Shavev, R. G. , J. Cell. Plast., 1970, 6, p. 125-125.

7. Matthews, R. B. and Swanson, M. L. , Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 1979, 58, 2, p. 223-223.

8. Rand, P. B. , J. Cell. Plast., 1973, 9, p. 130-130.

9. Shutov, F. A. , Adv. Polym. Sci., 1981, 39, p. 1–64.

10.

10. Price, H. J. and Nelson, J. B. , J. Compos. Mater., 1976, 10, p. 314-314.

11.

11. Shen, C. H. and Springer, G. S. , J. Compos. Mater., 1976, 10, p. 2-2.

12.

12. Shen, C. H. and Springer, G. S. , J. Compos. Mater., 1977, 11, p. 2-2.

13.

13. Buck, S. E. , Lischer, D. W. and Sia Nemat-Nasser , J. Compos. Mater., 1998, 32, 9, p. 874-874.

14.

14. Mckauge, E. L., Jr. , Reynolds, J. D. and Halkias, J. E. , J. App. Polym. Sci., 1978, 22, p. 1643-1643.

15.

15. Springer, G. S. , Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference). ASTM STP 674, Tsai, S. W. , Ed., ASTM, 1979, p. 291-291.

16.

16. Loos, A. C. and Springer, G. S. , J. Compos. Mater., 1980, 14, p. 142-142.

17.

17. Thomason, J. L. , Composites, 1995, 26, 7, p. 477-477.

18.

18. Boll, D. J. , Bascom, W. D. and Motiee, B. , Compos. Sci. and Tech., 1985, 24, p. 253-253.

19.

19. Allred, R. E. and Roylance, D. K. , J. Mater. Sci., 1983, 18, p. 652-652.

20.

20. Loos, A. C. and Springer, G. S. , J. Compos. Mater., 1979, 13, p. 131-131.

21.

21. Carter, H. G. and Kibler, K. G. , J. Compos. Mater., 1978, 12, p. 118-118.

22.

22. Bonniau, P. and Bunsell, A. R. , J. Compos. Mater., 1981, 15, 272-272.

23.

23. Hobaica, E. C. and Cook, F. D. , J. Cell. Plast., 1968, 4, p. 143-143.

24.

24. Davies, P. , Pomies, F. , and Carlsson, L. A. , App. Compos. Mater., 1996, 3, p. 71-71.

25.

25. Barker, A. J. and Balasundaram, V. , Composites, 1987, 18:3, p. 217-217.

26.

26. Haque, A. and Jeelani, S. , J. Rein. Plast. Compos., 1992, p. 146-146.

27.

27. Deanin, R. D. , and Kos, F. T. , Polym. Mater. Sci. Engg., 1985, 53, p. 821-821.

28.

28. d’Almeida, J. R. M. , Composites, 1991, 22:6, p. 448-448.

29.

29. Bellenger, V. , Verdu, J. and Morel, E. , J. Mater. Sci., 1989, 24 p. 63-63.

30.

30. Woo, M. S. and Piggott, M. R. J. Compos. Technol. Res., 1988, 10:1 (Spring), p. 16-16.