The birth doula movement highlights a fundamental conflict between biomedicine’s relationship with time and the uncertain processes of birth, demonstrating how speed at which interventions are offered and the timetables within which choices are made can interrupt and undermine patient autonomy, health, and safety. Drawing on 25 interviews with birth doulas in 2022–23, we present a theory of sociotemporal brokerage, arguing that doulas represent themselves as temporally attuned social brokers situated between hospitals and birthing people. We highlight various ways they claim to flow with the unpredictable rhythms of reproductive time and against harmful intrusions of biomedical time. In minimizing clocks and schedules and prioritizing emotions, informed consent, and relationships, doula narratives highlight the role the doula movement can play in humanizing reproductive care. We conclude by suggesting avenues for future research on reproductive justice and sociotemporal brokerage.
AdamBarbara. 1990. Time and Social Theory. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
2.
BasileMonica. 2015. “Reimagining the Birthing Body: Reproductive Justice and New Directions in Doula Care.” Pp. 226–46 in Doulas and Intimate Labour: Boundaries, Bodies, and Birth, edited by CastañedaAngela N.SearcyJulie Johnson. Bradford, ON, Canada: Demeter Press.
3.
BlackmanKacieJeffersonUrmeka K.Cotton-CurtisWycondaGallowayDetrich. 2024. “Story Circles of Black Doulas, Cultural Brokers for Birthing People in Healthcare.” Qualitative Health Research35 (22): 932–45
4.
Bond-TheriaultCandace. 2024. Queering Reproductive Justice: An Invitation. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BurtRonald S.2000. “The Social Network Structure of Social Capital.” Research in Organizational Behavior22:345–423.
EliasNorbert. 2007. “An Essay on Time.” in The Collected Works of Norbert Elias, vol. 9, edited by LloydStevenMennellStephen. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin Press.
14.
FauveauVincent. 1994. “The Role of Traditional Birth Attendants in Maternal Health Care in Developing Countries.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics47(1):1–13.
15.
FlahertyMichael. 2011. The Textures of Time: Agency and Temporal Experience. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
16.
FordAndrea. 2021. “Attuned Consent: Birth Doulas, Care, and the Politics of Consent.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies42(2):111–32.
17.
GokmenogluBirgan. 2022. “Temporality in the Social Sciences: New Directions for a Political Sociology of Time.” The British Journal of Sociology73:643–53.
18.
GunjaMunira Z.GumbasEvan D.MasithaRelebohileZephyrinLaurie C.2024. Insights into the U.S. Maternal Mortality Crisis: An International Comparison (Commonwealth Fund, June 2024). (https://doi.org/10.26099/cthn-st75).
19.
HalevyNirHalaliEliranZlatevJulian J.2019. “Brokerage and Brokering: An Integrative Review and Organizing Framework for Third Party Influence.” Academy of Management Annals13(1):215–39.
20.
HoyertDonna L.2025. “Maternal Mortality Rates in the United States, 2023.” NCHS Health E-Stats. doi:10.15620/cdc/174577.
21.
JohansonRichardNewburnMaryMacfarlaneAlison. 2002. “Has Medicalised Childbirth Gone Too Far?” British Medical Journal324(7342):892–95.
22.
KlausMarshall H.KennellJohn H.RobertsonSteven S.SosaRoberto. 1986. “Effects of Social Support During Parturition on Maternal and Infant Morbidity.” British Medical Journal293:585–87.
23.
KlineWendy. 2019. Coming Home: How Midwives Changed Birth. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
KozhimannilKaty B.HardemanRachel R.Alarid-EscuderoFernandoVogelsangCarrie A.Blauer-PetersonCoriHowellElizabeth A.2016. “Modeling the Cost-effectiveness of Doula Care Associated with Reductions in Preterm Birth and Cesarean Delivery.” Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care43(1):20–27.
25.
LantzPaula M.LowLisa KaneVarkeySanjaniWatsonRobyn L.2005. “Doulas as Childbirth Paraprofessionals: Results from a National Survey.” Women’s Health Issues15(3):109–16.
26.
LefebvreHenri. [1992] 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time, and Everyday Life. New York: Bloomsbury.
27.
LevittPeggy. 2007. God Needs No Passport: Immigrants and the Changing American Religious Landscape. New York: The New Press.
28.
LipskyMichael. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
MahoneyMaryMitchellLauren. 2016. The Doulas: Radical Care for Pregnant People. New York: First Feminist Press.
30.
McCourtChristine. 2009. Childbirth, Midwifery and Concepts of Time. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
31.
Meltzer NormanBariRothmanBarbara Katz. 2007. “The New Arrival: Labor Doulas and the Fragmentation of Midwifery and Caregiving.” In Laboring On: Birth in Transition in the United States, edited by SimondsWendyRothmanBarbara KatzNormanBari Meltzer. New York: Routledge.
32.
MillerSuellenAbalosEdgardoChamillardMonicaCiapponiAgustinColaciDanielaComandéDanielDiazVirginiaGellerStacieHansonClaudiaLangerAna. 2016. “Beyond Too Little, Too Late and Too Much, Too Soon: A Pathway Towards Evidence-based, Respectful Maternity Care Worldwide.” The Lancet388(10056):2176–92.
33.
MortonChristine H.CliftElayne. 2014. Birth Ambassadors: Doulas and the Re-emergence of Woman-supported Birth in America. Amarillo, TX: Praeclarus Press.
34.
NeufeldHannah TaitCidroJaime. 2017. Indigenous Experiences of Pregnancy and Birth. Bradford, ON, Canada: Demeter Press.
35.
NeumannIver B.2005. “To Be a Diplomat.” International Studies Perspectives6(1):72–93.
36.
OrellanaMargorie Faulstich. 2009. Translating Childhoods: Immigrant Youth, Language, and Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
37.
Ramey-CollierKhailaJacksonMayaMalloyAngelaMcMillanCindyScraders-PyattAndoraWheelerSarahn M.2023. “Doula Care: A Review of Outcomes and Impact on Birth Experience.” Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey78(2):124–27.
38.
RossLorettaSolinger.Rickie [1997] 2017. Reproductive Justice: An Introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California.
39.
RothmanBarbara Katz. 1991. In Labor: Women and Power in the Birthplace. New York: W.W. Norton.
40.
RothmanBarbara Katz. [1989] 2000. Recreating Motherhood. New York: Rutgers University Press.
41.
SandallJane CristinaTurienzoFernandezDevaneDeclanSoltaniHoraGillespiePaddyGatesSimonJonesLeanne V.ShennanAndrew H.Rayment-JonesHannah. 2024. “Midwife Continuity of Care Models Versus Other Models of Care for Childbearing Women.” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews4:1–153.
42.
SearcyJulie JohnsonBlockEllenCastañedaAngela. 2024. “Strategic Advocacy: Doula Care, Liminality, and Reproductive Justice.” Studies in Comparative International Development60:863–87.
43.
SilversteinMerrilBengtsonVern L.1997. “Intergenerational Solidarity and the Structure of Adult Child-Parent Relationships in American Families.” American Journal of Sociology103(2):429–60.
44.
SimmelGeorg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Translated and Edited by WolffKurt H.Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
45.
SobczakAlexandriaTaylorLaurenSolomonSydneyHoJodiPhillipsBrandonJacobsonKaileyCastellanoCourteneyRingAshleyCastellanoBriannaJacobsRobin J.2023. “The Effect of Doulas on Maternal and Birth Outcomes: A Scoping Review.” Cureus15(5):e39451. doi:10.7759/cureus.39451.
46.
TrostSusannaBeauregardJenniferNjieFannyHarveyAlyssaBerryJasmineChandraGyanGoodmanDavid. 2022. “Pregnancy-related Deaths: Data from Maternal Mortality Review Committees in 36 U.S.States, 2017-2019.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
